Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Commonwealth of Kentucky (2)
- Kentucky (2)
- Recovery (2)
- Tort (2)
- Apportion (1)
-
- Book review (1)
- Breach (1)
- Checklist (1)
- Comparative (1)
- Comparative negligence (1)
- Damages (1)
- David Elder (1)
- Defamation (1)
- Duty (1)
- Fault (1)
- Injury (1)
- Jury (1)
- Last clear chance (1)
- Liability (1)
- Litigation (1)
- Multiple tortfeasors (1)
- Negligent (1)
- Privacy (1)
- Right of Privacy (1)
- Setoff (1)
- Tortfeasor (1)
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Torts
Kentucky Tort Law: Defamation And The Right Of Privacy, Richard C. Ausness
Kentucky Tort Law: Defamation And The Right Of Privacy, Richard C. Ausness
Law Faculty Scholarly Articles
This book review examines Kentucky Tort Law: Defamation and the Right of Privacy by David A. Elder, which was published in 1983.
A Comparative Negligence Checklist To Avoid Future Unnecessary Litigation, John M. Rogers, Randy Donald Shaw
A Comparative Negligence Checklist To Avoid Future Unnecessary Litigation, John M. Rogers, Randy Donald Shaw
Law Faculty Scholarly Articles
Systems of comparative negligence, whereby the negligence of a plaintiff serves to reduce rather than to preclude tort recovery in negligence, have been adopted in thirty-nine states. The common law rule that contributory negligence is an absolute bar to recovery is still the law in Kentucky, although modified by the doctrine of "last clear chance." Kentucky may soon join the trend toward comparative negligence, however. In the last legislative session, bills to adopt comparative negligence were introduced in both the House of Representatives and the Senate. A hearing on this subject was held by the Interim Judiciary and Civil Procedure …
A Comparative Negligence Checklist To Avoid Future Unnecessary Litigation, John M. Rogers, Randy Donald Shaw
A Comparative Negligence Checklist To Avoid Future Unnecessary Litigation, John M. Rogers, Randy Donald Shaw
Law Faculty Scholarly Articles
Systems of comparative negligence, whereby the negligence of a plaintiff serves to reduce rather than to preclude tort recovery in negligence, have been adopted in thirty-nine states. The common law rule that contributory negligence is an absolute bar to recover is still the law in Kentucky, although modified by the doctrine of “last clear chance.” Kentucky may soon join the trend toward comparative negligence, however. In the last legislative session, bills to adopt comparative negligence were introduced in both the House of Representatives and the Senate. A hearing on this subject was held by the Interim Judiciary and Civil Procedure …