Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Other Law (43)
- Litigation (20)
- Consumer Protection Law (15)
- Legal Remedies (12)
- Internet Law (10)
-
- Civil Law (9)
- Business Organizations Law (8)
- Commercial Law (7)
- Contracts (6)
- Health Law and Policy (6)
- Legislation (6)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (5)
- Constitutional Law (5)
- Courts (5)
- Jurisprudence (5)
- Science and Technology Law (5)
- State and Local Government Law (5)
- Supreme Court of the United States (5)
- Administrative Law (4)
- Criminal Law (4)
- Food and Drug Law (4)
- Human Rights Law (4)
- Labor and Employment Law (4)
- Law and Economics (4)
- Law and Philosophy (4)
- Antitrust and Trade Regulation (3)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (3)
- Computer Law (3)
- Keyword
-
- 2014 Farm Bill (1)
- 9/11; First Responder Cases; Victims Compensation Fund (1)
- Amazon; Second Restatement of Torts; distribution chain; product defects; injury; consumers; sellers; Section 402a; marketplace; insolvency; internet; product liability; Oberdorf v. Amazon.com; Communications Decency Act; Third Circuit; Third-party sellers; Fullfillment by Amazon; FBA; Business Solutions Agreement; BSA; price parity; third-party vendors; sponsorship; Amazon's choice; Best Seller; Prime; keyword bids; supply chain; Buy Box; FDA; Food and Drug Administration (1)
- And Cosmetic Act; Products Liability; (1)
- Antitrust; consumer protection; Brandeis; neo-classical; Bork; fintech; automobiles; Uber; Amazon; merchant; seller; Torts; restatment of torts; political; economic; internet; european union; Reagan; Trump; authoritarian; democratizing; regulation; class-action; state class-action (1)
-
- Apparent consent (1)
- Artificial Intelligence; Black-Box; Tunkl; Tunkl v. Regents of The University of California; Bargaining Power; Heuristic Biases; Information Asymmetry; Liability; Boilerplate; Radin; Healthcare Artificial Intelligence; Health Apps; Health Mobile Apps; Contract Formation; Tort Law; Contract Law (1)
- Artificial Intelligence; Medical Artificial Intelligence; Tort Law; Personhood; Black Box; Health Law (1)
- Battery (1)
- Bolger v. Amazon.com (1)
- China; medical negligence; litigation; selection bias; adversarial bias; judicial deference; courts; expert opinions; court appointed expert testimony; inquisitorial system; authentication; re-authentication; Supreme People's Court; documents of adjudication decisions; FA-MNA; MA-MNA; medical associations; forensic authentication agency; municipal; provincial; national; locality rule; common law; civil law; defendant; plaintiff; fault; causation; causal contribution; personal injury (1)
- Choice of law; territorialism; conflict of laws (1)
- Civil Rights Act; Title VII; Discrimination Law; workplace discrimination; Adverse Employment Action; Hostile Work Environment; Brown v. Brody; Chambers v. District of Columbia; Circuit Split; harm; de minimis harm; Muldrow v. City of St. Louis Missouri (1)
- Civil rights; police misconduct; police tort liability; intellectual history of public and private law; public law; private law; intentional infliction of emotional distress; IIED; police accountability law; Section 1983; constitutional tort; tort law; tort liability; middle spaces; racialized policing; (1)
- Comparative fault (1)
- Consent (1)
- Consumer information (1)
- Criminal Law; Tort Law; Expert Evidence (1)
- Data breach; standing; data breach litigation; hacking; personal information; data theft; personally identifiable information; data breach notification; cybersecurity; law; policy; third party cyber liability (1)
- Drug (1)
- European Union; Canada; United States; Alien Tort Statute; Nestlé v. Doe; forced labor; slavery; supply chain; corporate accountability; Bill C-262; contracts; American Bar Association; Model Contract Clauses; human rights due diligence; United Nations; UNGP’s; Guiding Principles of Businesses and Human Rights; corporate social responsibility; ESG compliance (1)
- Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; small-sum claims; consumer; consumer protection; tort; class action; Rule 23; consumer law; modern class action; Federal Arbitration Act; Federal Class Action Fairness Act; Field Code of Civil Procedure; Field Code; Federal Rules of Equity; hisorical; ambulance chaser; Israel Beckhardt; Marcel Kovarsky; Knorr v. Gen. Banking Co.; Kovarsky v. Brook. Union Gas Co.; finance; personal loan; Uniform Commerical Code; UCC; Daar v. Yellow Cab Co.; Hall v. Coburn Corp.; National Office for the Rights of the Indigent; NORI; NAACP; NAACP Legal Defense Fund; state class action; Snyder v. Harris; Truth in Lending Act; TILA; Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Shutts; Class Action Fairness Act; CAFA; Chuck Grassley; Federal Arbitration Act; FAA; enforcement; litigation; aggregation; procedure; procedural rules; torts; legal aid; (1)
- Food Safety Modernization Act (1)
- Food safety (1)
- Food safety liability insurance (1)
- Food safety regulation (1)
- Foodborne illness (1)
- Foodborne pathogens (1)
- Implied consent (1)
- Inc. (1)
- Publication Year
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 30 of 116
Full-Text Articles in Torts
Dogma, Discrimination, And Doctrinal Disarray: A New Test To Define Harm Under Title Vii, Zach Islam
Dogma, Discrimination, And Doctrinal Disarray: A New Test To Define Harm Under Title Vii, Zach Islam
Brooklyn Law Review
Historically, federal courts have used the “adverse employment action” test in Title VII disparate treatment, disparate impact, and retaliation cases to determine whether a plaintiff has suffered adequate harm. This note argues that this approach is fundamentally flawed. At the outset, the test is a judicial power grab with no support in the statutory language. What is more, it fails to uphold the plain policy purposes for Title VII by largely ignoring evidence of discriminatory acts in the workplace that Congress sought to prevent in passing the statute. Consequently, Title VII plaintiffs get the short end of the stick with …
A New Private Law Of Policing, Cristina Carmody Tilley
A New Private Law Of Policing, Cristina Carmody Tilley
Brooklyn Law Review
American law and American life are asymmetrical. Law divides neatly in two: public and private. But life is lived in three distinct spaces: pure public, pure private, and hybrid middle spaces that are neither state nor home. Which body of law governs the shops, gyms, and workplaces that are formally accessible to all, but functionally hostile to Black, female, poor, and other marginalized Americans? From the liberal midcentury onward, social justice advocates have treated these spaces as fundamentally public and fully remediable via public law equity commands. This article takes a broader view. It urges a tort law revival in …
Situating Bystanders Within Strict Products Liability, Mark A. Geistfeld
Situating Bystanders Within Strict Products Liability, Mark A. Geistfeld
Brooklyn Journal of Corporate, Financial & Commercial Law
"The largely neglected role of bystanders within products liability is reflected in the extensive scholarship of Professor Aaron Twerski—the rightly celebrated honoree of this symposium. Within Twerski’s vast body of impressive publications, his limited discussions of bystanders align with the widely held assumption that, aside from the problems they pose for the consumer expectations test, bystanders do not merit much attention within the context of products liability. Bystander injuries are much more important than is commonly recognized; one must focus on them to adequately identify the conditions under which consumer-choice doctrines properly limit tort liability. Because the varied rules of …
In The Duty Wars, I'M Switzerland, W. Bradley Wendel
In The Duty Wars, I'M Switzerland, W. Bradley Wendel
Brooklyn Journal of Corporate, Financial & Commercial Law
The “duty wars” have been raging among tort scholars for some time, sparked by the Third Restatement’s deflationary approach to the duty element of the negligence cause of action. Defenders of the traditional approach to duty insist that it is necessary to ensure that tort law stays on the right side of the boundary between public and private law insofar as the negligence tort recognizes a relational conception of rights owed among individuals. The worry is that negligence shorn of the duty element becomes an instrument of efficiency or deterrence rather than recognizing obligations. Relatedly, the approach pioneered by the …
Expert Evidence: The Gatekeeper Role Of Justice, Victor E. Schwartz
Expert Evidence: The Gatekeeper Role Of Justice, Victor E. Schwartz
Brooklyn Journal of Corporate, Financial & Commercial Law
No abstract provided.
Not All Product-Caused Harm Is "Products Liability", Michael D. Green
Not All Product-Caused Harm Is "Products Liability", Michael D. Green
Brooklyn Journal of Corporate, Financial & Commercial Law
"Since two important federal preemption decisions by the United States Supreme Court, those injured by warnings defects in the drugs they take may sue the manufacturer only if the patient took a brand-name drug. Those who took the generic version of the drug, which comprise approximately 90 percent of all prescriptions, cannot sue the drug manufacturer regardless of how inadequate its labeling is in explaining the risks of consuming the drug. Clever plaintiffs’ lawyers began bringing suits on behalf of their generic-drug-consuming clients against brand-name manufacturers that, under the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, control the labeling both on their …
Professor Aaron Twerski: Special Master In The 9/11 Responders' Litigation, Stephan Landsman
Professor Aaron Twerski: Special Master In The 9/11 Responders' Litigation, Stephan Landsman
Brooklyn Journal of Corporate, Financial & Commercial Law
No abstract provided.
Enterprise, Liability, And Insolvency: An Essay In Honor Of Aaron Twerski, Edward J. Janger
Enterprise, Liability, And Insolvency: An Essay In Honor Of Aaron Twerski, Edward J. Janger
Brooklyn Journal of Corporate, Financial & Commercial Law
Modern tort law links concepts of duty, duty of care, causation, and compensatory damages in a manner that, it is hoped, simultaneously communicates moral suasion, redresses wrongs, and incentivizes “reasonable” socially appropriate behavior. Deterrence and corrective justice differ fiercely about the scope of and rationale for liability, but both assume that tortfeasors are good for their debts (or at least insured). This is not always the case. Sometimes, debtors are insolvent. Bankruptcy law provides individuals with a route to a fresh start, and this paper considers the relationship between modern tort law and the discharge of debt in bankruptcy. The …
Aaron Twerski — Practical Wisdom At Ground Zero, Anthony J. Sebok
Aaron Twerski — Practical Wisdom At Ground Zero, Anthony J. Sebok
Brooklyn Journal of Corporate, Financial & Commercial Law
This Article celebrates Professor. Aaron Twerski’s “practical wisdom” in crafting a solution (with Jim Henderson) to a problem faced by Judge Alvin Hellerstein in the so-called 9/11 First Responder cases. The problem was that Congress did not include these plaintiffs within the Victims Compensation Fund (“VCF”) despite there being every reason to suspect that the interaction of workersman’s compensation law and tort law, if left to operate on their own, would generate a politically unacceptable outcome. Despite his clear misgivings – —expressed decades earlier – —about allowing those who control the workplace to enjoy the benefits of limited liability guaranteed …
The Constitutional Claim To Individuation In Tort — A Tale Of Two Centuries, Part 2, Douglas A. Kysar
The Constitutional Claim To Individuation In Tort — A Tale Of Two Centuries, Part 2, Douglas A. Kysar
Brooklyn Journal of Corporate, Financial & Commercial Law
This Article—drafted to honor Professor Aaron Twerski on the occasion of his festschrift at Brooklyn Law School—draws inspiration from his classic 1989 article on market share liability. In that article, Professor Twerski observed that doctrinal confusions in market share liability arose from judges who “had their feet firmly planted in two different centuries—one foot in the nineteenth century and the other in the twenty-first century.” This Article takes inspiration from Twerski’s “two centuries” metaphor to examine the rise of constitutional objections by defendants to certain doctrinal innovations that attempt to adapt tort law to modern ways of causing, identifying, and …
Getting The Law Right: An Essay In Honor Of Aaron Twerski, John C. P. Goldberg, Benjamin C. Zipursky
Getting The Law Right: An Essay In Honor Of Aaron Twerski, John C. P. Goldberg, Benjamin C. Zipursky
Brooklyn Journal of Corporate, Financial & Commercial Law
Written in honor of the great torts scholar Aaron Twerski, this article critically analyzes disturbing developments in New York negligence law as it applies to police who injure innocent bystanders. With the New York Court of Appeals’ 2022 decision in Ferreira v. City of Binghamton as a focal point, it argues that Ferreira and other contemporary decisions have largely betrayed the promise of the 1929 Court of Claims Act, which waived state and municipal immunity for police torts. While courts may be warranted in recognizing certain limits on police negligence liability that do not apply to private actors, the current …
Engaging With Professor Twerski In The Choice Of Law Revolution, Robert A. Sedler
Engaging With Professor Twerski In The Choice Of Law Revolution, Robert A. Sedler
Brooklyn Journal of Corporate, Financial & Commercial Law
No abstract provided.
Clicking Away Consent: Establishing Accountability And Liability Apportionment In Direct-To-Consumer Healthcare Artificial Intelligence, Stephanie L. Lee
Clicking Away Consent: Establishing Accountability And Liability Apportionment In Direct-To-Consumer Healthcare Artificial Intelligence, Stephanie L. Lee
Brooklyn Law Review
Artificial Intelligence (AI) and machine learning are making sweeping changes across all industries, and health care is no exception. AI promises to revolutionize patient treatment with the development of algorithm-driven tools to improve efficiency in clinical care. As alluring as machine-driven learning may be given its potentialities, however, the incorporation of AI into the healthcare field has also been received with trepidation. This fear is understandable given the lack of transparency to the public surrounding the exact mechanisms for creating algorithms and the reasoning followed by the software. Indeed, AI in the healthcare system is aptly known as “black-box medicine.” …
Contracting Against Slavery: Corporate Accountability For Human Rights Supply Chain Violations, Alexandra Hyken
Contracting Against Slavery: Corporate Accountability For Human Rights Supply Chain Violations, Alexandra Hyken
Brooklyn Journal of International Law
The United States Supreme Court decision in Nestlé USA, Inc. v. Doe effectively closed the door for forced laborers in the global supply chain to sue corporations headquartered in the United States for aiding and abetting in their human trafficking under the Alien Tort Statute. At the same time, however, the European Union and Canada are passing legislative measures that increase corporate accountability for human rights supply chain violations. This note argues that, in light of the Nestlé decision, contracts can be an effective mechanism for corporate accountability in the United States and that multi-national corporations will be incentivized to …
When Sexual Assault Becomes Incident To Military Service, Lauren C. Brady
When Sexual Assault Becomes Incident To Military Service, Lauren C. Brady
Journal of Law and Policy
For seventy-two years, federal courts have barred military servicemembers who are survivors of sexual assault from recovery under the Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA). The Feres doctrine, promulgated from the Supreme Court case Feres v. United States, became the foundation for federal courts’ decisions that sexual assault is incident to one’s service in the military. Courts’ over-deference to the military has enabled a system that turns a blind eye to perpetrators and abusive environments on bases. However, the Ninth Circuit recently turned the tide in FTCA cases, holding in Spletstoser v. Hyten that military sexual assault survivors should be permitted …
Aggregation And Abuse: Mass Torts In Bankruptcy, Edward J. Janger
Aggregation And Abuse: Mass Torts In Bankruptcy, Edward J. Janger
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Privity 2.0 May Be Even Better For Tort Defendants, Anita Bernstein
Privity 2.0 May Be Even Better For Tort Defendants, Anita Bernstein
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Paging Doctor Robot: Medical Artificial Intelligence, Tort Liability, And Why Personhood May Be The Answer, Benedict See
Paging Doctor Robot: Medical Artificial Intelligence, Tort Liability, And Why Personhood May Be The Answer, Benedict See
Brooklyn Law Review
Artificial intelligence (AI) is a part of everyday life. From our phones, to social media accounts, to online shopping, AI is present and enhances our daily experiences. One area where AI has a heavy (and an increasing) presence is the medical industry. Just as humans make mistakes, so does AI. However, when a human doctor makes a mistake, they can be sued for malpractice, but when AI makes a mistake, who is to be held responsible? Because tort law was designed with humans in mind, it may be hard to apply to medical AI, who’s “black box” algorithms make their …
Delegation And The Continuity Thesis, Andrew S. Gold
Delegation And The Continuity Thesis, Andrew S. Gold
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Without A Voice, Without A Forum: Finding Iirira Section 1252(G) Unconstitutional, Amanda Simms
Without A Voice, Without A Forum: Finding Iirira Section 1252(G) Unconstitutional, Amanda Simms
Brooklyn Law Review
The Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA) abrogates sovereign immunity in certain circumstances to allow private individuals, regardless of citizenship, to sue the United States for specific torts committed by government officials. Yet when two lawful permanent residents—located in different parts of the country—separately tried to sue the government for wrongful removal, one court dismissed the suit for lack of subject matter jurisdiction while the other court did not. These decisions, though reaching opposite conclusions, both relied on federal immigration statute 8 U.S.C. § 1252(g) in order to determine whether judicial review of immigrants’ removal orders is precluded. This note argues …
Q: What Is Tort? A: Categorical Hurt, Anita Bernstein
Q: What Is Tort? A: Categorical Hurt, Anita Bernstein
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Three Deft Kicks To The Problem Of Cyberbullying, Anita Bernstein
Three Deft Kicks To The Problem Of Cyberbullying, Anita Bernstein
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Symposium: Consumer Welfare Market Structure And Political Power, Edward J. Janger
Symposium: Consumer Welfare Market Structure And Political Power, Edward J. Janger
Brooklyn Journal of Corporate, Financial & Commercial Law
Two competing visions dominate the fields of antitrust and consumer protection: neo-liberal and progressive. The neo-classical approach is associated with Robert Bork and the Law and Economics Movement. The progressive strand is older, identified with Brandeis and early 20th Century social reform. As a matter of chronology the Brandeisian view dominated into the 1970s, but from 1980, until recently, the Borkian law and economics approach has been in ascendancy in Congress, the academy, and in the courts. Technological change and events in the broader economy have caused the politics and the academic focus to shift. The financial crisis of 2008-09 …
Cyber-Insecurity: The Reasonableness Standard In Internet Of Things Device Regulation And Why Technical Standards Are Better Equipped To Combat Cybercrime, Chynna Rose Foucek
Cyber-Insecurity: The Reasonableness Standard In Internet Of Things Device Regulation And Why Technical Standards Are Better Equipped To Combat Cybercrime, Chynna Rose Foucek
Brooklyn Journal of Corporate, Financial & Commercial Law
While the Internet of Things (IoT) has created an interconnected world via phones, laptops, and even household devices, it is not infallible. As cyber-attacks increase in frequency, affecting companies of all sizes and industries, IoT device manufacturers have become particularly vulnerable, due in large part to the fact that many companies fail to implement adequate cybersecurity protocols. Mass data breaches occur often. However, these companies are not held accountable due to the use of the reasonableness standard in existing cybersecurity legislation, which is flexible and malleable. In 2019, the California Legislature enacted a cybersecurity law specific to IoT device manufacturers. …
Warranty, Product Liability And Transaction Structure: The Problem Of Amazon, Edward J. Janger, Aaron D. Twerski
Warranty, Product Liability And Transaction Structure: The Problem Of Amazon, Edward J. Janger, Aaron D. Twerski
Brooklyn Journal of Corporate, Financial & Commercial Law
Amazon, and other internet sales platforms, have revolutionized the manner in which goods are purchased and sold. The obligations undertaken by Amazon in those sales are unclear, both as a matter of transparency, and as a matter of legal doctrine. Is Amazon a store? Is it a shipper? Is it a telephone? In various transactions Amazon can play some or all of these roles. Choosing the right metaphor has consequences. Amazon knows this and has done everything it can to deploy the metaphors selectively to its best legal and practical advantage, even when the chosen characterizations are inapt or even …
A History Of Consumer Class Actions In State Courts, Anne Fleming
A History Of Consumer Class Actions In State Courts, Anne Fleming
Brooklyn Journal of Corporate, Financial & Commercial Law
Most historians date the “modern” class action to the 1966 amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Yet, the class action or “representative suit” has a longer, unexplored history in the state courts. In the late 1930s and 1940s, a group of scrappy, first-generation lawyers tried to build their businesses by aggregating the small-sum claims of many consumers. The defendants in these cases were, for example, lenders who failed to comply with the technicalities of state disclosure mandates, and utility companies that charged consumers extra fees. Each consumer’s claim was small, but, as a group, the claims could yield …
The Revolution Of The Commercial Space Industry: Why Current Laws Must Be Replaced Before American Business Expands To The Moon And Beyond, Drew M. Fryhoff
The Revolution Of The Commercial Space Industry: Why Current Laws Must Be Replaced Before American Business Expands To The Moon And Beyond, Drew M. Fryhoff
Brooklyn Journal of Corporate, Financial & Commercial Law
Space, the final frontier. Resting at the rim of the Earth, an endless void full of opportunity awaits those who are willing to take a leap of faith. Historically, only national space programs have been capable of orchestrating expeditions to outer space. However, American aerospace companies now rival governmental entities in their abilities to operate beyond the Earth’s atmosphere. State-of-the-art developments in aerospace technology have positioned the American commercial space sector to become more productive than national space programs in the years to come. Unfortunately, the potential of the American commercial space sector is severely hindered under the Treaty on …
The Heavy Hand Of Amazon: A Seller Not A Neutral Platform, Edward J. Janger, Aaron D. Twerski
The Heavy Hand Of Amazon: A Seller Not A Neutral Platform, Edward J. Janger, Aaron D. Twerski
Brooklyn Journal of Corporate, Financial & Commercial Law
Since the adoption of Section 402A of the Second Restatement of Torts, every party in a product’s distribution chain has been potentially liable for injuries caused by product defects. Consumers who buy from reputable sellers are almost always guaranteed to have a solvent defendant if injured by a product defect. Amazon, though responsible for a vast number of retail sales, has sought to avoid liability by claiming that it is not a seller but a neutral platform that merely facilitates third-party sales to consumers. With two significant exceptions, most courts have sided with Amazon and concluded that Amazon is not …
Who Sells? Testing Amazon.Com For Product Defect Liability In Pennsylvania And Beyond, Aaron Doyer
Who Sells? Testing Amazon.Com For Product Defect Liability In Pennsylvania And Beyond, Aaron Doyer
Journal of Law and Policy
Pennsylvania, like other states, has struggled over the past few decades to apply the policy principles of product defect law—a tort characterized by strict liability. Because strict liability bypasses the traditional requirement in tort that a plaintiff prove the defendant’s negligence, and instead requires only a showing that the plaintiff was injured by a product sold in a defective condition, these inquiries raise a deceptively simple question: who sells? Recently, in a landmark case in Pennsylvania, the Third Circuit made waves by declaring Amazon.com, an enormous online marketplace, the legal “seller” of a product shipped and sold by a vendor …
The Heavy Hand Of Amazon: A Seller Not A Neutral Platform, Aaron D. Twerski, Edward J. Janger
The Heavy Hand Of Amazon: A Seller Not A Neutral Platform, Aaron D. Twerski, Edward J. Janger
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.