Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- BLR (8)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (7)
- Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law (4)
- West Virginia University (4)
- American University Washington College of Law (1)
-
- Chicago-Kent College of Law (1)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (1)
- Penn State Law (1)
- Selected Works (1)
- SelectedWorks (1)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (1)
- University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School (1)
- University of Pittsburgh School of Law (1)
- University of Richmond (1)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (1)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- ExpressO (7)
- Vanderbilt Law Review (6)
- Villanova Law Review (4)
- West Virginia Law Review (4)
- All Faculty Scholarship (1)
-
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (1)
- Articles in Law Reviews & Other Academic Journals (1)
- Chicago-Kent Law Review (1)
- Christopher C. French (1)
- George Mason University School of Law Working Papers Series (1)
- Hon. Mark C. Dillon (1)
- Journal Articles (1)
- Nevada Supreme Court Summaries (1)
- Scholarship (1)
- University of Richmond Law Review (1)
- Vanderbilt Law School Faculty Publications (1)
- Washington and Lee Law Review (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 30 of 34
Full-Text Articles in Torts
The Euclid Proviso, Ezra Rosser
The Euclid Proviso, Ezra Rosser
Articles in Law Reviews & Other Academic Journals
This Article argues that the Euclid Proviso, which allows regional concerns to trump local zoning when required by the general welfare, should play a larger role in zoning's second century. Traditional zoning operates to severely limit the construction of additional housing. This locks in the advantages of homeowners but at tremendous cost, primarily in the form of unaffordable housing, to those who would like to join the community. State preemption of local zoning defies traditional categorization; it is at once both radically destabilizing and market-responsive. But, given the ways in which zoning is a foundational part of the racial and …
Causation In Cases Of Evidential Uncertainty: Juridical Techniques And Fundamental Issues, Ken Oliphant
Causation In Cases Of Evidential Uncertainty: Juridical Techniques And Fundamental Issues, Ken Oliphant
Chicago-Kent Law Review
This paper reviews from a comparative legal perspective the range of juridical techniques that have been developed in different legal systems to address perceived problems of uncertain alternative causation. It finds that the process of development has generally proceeded in an ad hoc and unprincipled fashion, without regard for overall coherence. It argues for a more principled legal approach in which the appropriate legal response (full liability, proportional liability or no liability) is adopted on the basis of a ranking of the different categories of cases in which problems of causal uncertainty can arise, reflecting the strength (or weakness) of …
Rish V. Simao, 132 Nev. Adv. Op. 17 (Mar. 17, 2016), Heather Caliguire
Rish V. Simao, 132 Nev. Adv. Op. 17 (Mar. 17, 2016), Heather Caliguire
Nevada Supreme Court Summaries
The Nevada Supreme Court held that the District Court wrongly excluded evidence of low-impact defense when it required a biomechanical expert testify about the nature of the accident, erroneously interpreting Hallmark v. Eldgridge Instead, Hallmark requires sufficient foundation for admission of testimony and evidence, specifically excluding a biomechanical expert’s testimony under NRS 50.275. The Court additionally held that the District Court erred when it ultimately struck the defendant’s answer for violations of the pretrial order precluding defendant from raising a minor or low impact defense.
Breaking The Ice: How Plaintiffs May Establish Premises Liability In "Black Ice" Cases Where The Dangerous Condition Is By Definition Not Visible Or Apparent To The Property Owner, Hon. Mark Dillon
Hon. Mark C. Dillon
Plaintiffs that are injured as a result of encounters with "black ice," as distinguished from regular ice, face peculiar difficulties in establishing liability against property owners for the dangerous icy conditions on their premises. Black ice results from a unique process under certain conditions by which air bubbles are expelled from water during the freezing process, rendering the ice virtually invisible to the naked eye. Property owners therefore are not typically on actual or constructive notice of black ice conditions as to become subject to the legal requirement of undertaking measures to remedy the conditions. This article explores the law …
Catalogs, Gideon Parchomovsky, Alex Stein
Catalogs, Gideon Parchomovsky, Alex Stein
All Faculty Scholarship
It is a virtual axiom in the world of law that legal norms come in two prototypes: rules and standards. The accepted lore suggests that rules should be formulated to regulate recurrent and frequent behaviors, whose contours can be defined with sufficient precision. Standards, by contrast, should be employed to address complex, variegated, behaviors that require the weighing of multiple variables. Rules rely on an ex ante perspective and are therefore considered the domain of the legislator; standards embody a preference for ex post, ad-hoc, analysis and are therefore considered the domain of courts. The rules/standards dichotomy has become a …
The “Ensuing Loss” Clause In Insurance Policies: The Forgotten And Misunderstood Antidote To Anti-Concurrent Causation Exclusions, Chris French
Journal Articles
As a result of the 1906 earthquake and fire in San Francisco which destroyed the city, a clause known as the “ensuing loss” clause was created to address concurrent causation situations in which a loss follows both a covered peril and an excluded peril. Ensuing loss clauses appear in the exclusions section of such policies and in essence they provide that coverage for a loss caused by an excluded peril is nonetheless covered if the loss “ensues” from a covered peril. Today, ensuing loss clauses are found in “all risk” property and homeowners policies, which cover all losses except for …
When 10 Trials Are Better Than 1000: An Evidentiary Perspective On Trial Sampling, Edward K. Cheng
When 10 Trials Are Better Than 1000: An Evidentiary Perspective On Trial Sampling, Edward K. Cheng
Vanderbilt Law School Faculty Publications
In many mass tort cases, separately trying all individual claims is impractical, and thus a number of trial courts and commentators have explored the use of statistical sampling as a way of efficiently processing claims. Most discussions on the topic, however, implicitly assume that sampling is a “second best” solution: individual trials are preferred for accuracy, and sampling only justified under extraordinary circumstances. This Essay explores whether this assumption is really true. While intuitively one might think that individual trials would be more accurate at estimating liability than extrapolating from a subset of cases, the Essay offers three ways in …
The “Ensuing Loss” Clause In Insurance Policies: The Forgotten And Misunderstood Antidote To Anti-Concurrent Causation Exclusions, Chris French
Christopher C. French
As a result of the 1906 earthquake and fire in San Francisco which destroyed the city, a clause known as the “ensuing loss” clause was created to address concurrent causation situations in which a loss follows both a covered peril and an excluded peril. Ensuing loss clauses appear in the exclusions section of such policies and in essence they provide that coverage for a loss caused by an excluded peril is nonetheless covered if the loss “ensues” from a covered peril. Today, ensuing loss clauses are found in “all risk” property and homeowners policies, which cover all losses except for …
Daubert And The Disappearing Jury Trial, Allan Kanner
Daubert And The Disappearing Jury Trial, Allan Kanner
ExpressO
Since being decided by the Supreme Court in 1993, Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals has earned its place as one of the most misinterpreted and misapplied decisions in modern history. Meant to liberalize the standards for admissions of proof, the decision has had the opposite effect. The gatekeeper powers given to judges via Daubert, coupled with the internal and external incentives to prevent jury trials, has placed our entire civil justice system at risk.
A Complete Property Right Amendment, John H. Ryskamp
A Complete Property Right Amendment, John H. Ryskamp
ExpressO
The trend of the eminent domain reform and "Kelo plus" initiatives is toward a comprehensive Constitutional property right incorporating the elements of level of review, nature of government action, and extent of compensation. This article contains a draft amendment which reflects these concerns.
Reassessing Damages In Securities Fraud Class Actions, Elizabeth C. Burch
Reassessing Damages In Securities Fraud Class Actions, Elizabeth C. Burch
ExpressO
No coherent doctrinal statement exists for calculating open-market damages for securities fraud class actions. Instead, courts have tried in vain to fashion common-law deceit and misrepresentation remedies to fit open-market fraud. The result is a relatively ineffective system with a hallmark feature: unpredictable damage awards. This poses a significant fraud deterrence problem from both a practical and a theoretical standpoint.
In 2005, the Supreme Court had the opportunity to clarify open-market damage principles and to facilitate earlier dismissal of cases without compensable economic losses. Instead, in Dura Pharmaceuticals v. Broudo, it further confused the damage issue by (1) perpetuating the …
Believing In Products Liability: Reflections On Daubert, Doctrinal Evolution, And David Owen's "Products Liability Law", Richard L. Cupp
Believing In Products Liability: Reflections On Daubert, Doctrinal Evolution, And David Owen's "Products Liability Law", Richard L. Cupp
ExpressO
No abstract provided.
The Overlapping Magisteria Of Law And Science: When Litigation And Science Collide, William G. Childs
The Overlapping Magisteria Of Law And Science: When Litigation And Science Collide, William G. Childs
ExpressO
The Supreme Court’s 1993 decision in Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals transformed courts’ evaluation of expert testimony. Many courts, applying Daubert, focus extensively on whether the purported expert’s methodology has been published in a peer-reviewed journal.
This focus on peer review results in two unintended consequences that have triggered criticism: litigation-driven scholarship and litigants taking discovery into the peer review process. Critics contend that litigation-driven scholarship is irredeemably biased and that peer review discovery is too often an effort to intimidate scholars from speaking on subjects of public concern.
In this Article, I explore these phenomena and the criticisms of …
The Accuracy And Manipulability Of Lost Profits Damages Calculations: Should The Trier Of Fact Be "Reasonably Certain"?, Jonathan T. Tomlin, David Merrell
The Accuracy And Manipulability Of Lost Profits Damages Calculations: Should The Trier Of Fact Be "Reasonably Certain"?, Jonathan T. Tomlin, David Merrell
ExpressO
The accuracy and manipulability of calculations for lost profits damages are critical determinants of the ability of harmed parties to receive just compensation in a wide range of legal cases including antitrust, fraud, false advertising, intellectual property infringement, and breach of contract. They are also important determinants of the deterrent effects of the law. Using a sample of over 5,000 U.S. firms, we show that simple damages methods are capable of being substantially inaccurate. We also show that damages methods in general are highly susceptible to manipulation. In the absence of reasonable justifications for why particular data sets and methods …
Breaking The Bank: Revisiting Central Bank Of Denver After Enron And Sarbanes-Oxley, Celia Taylor
Breaking The Bank: Revisiting Central Bank Of Denver After Enron And Sarbanes-Oxley, Celia Taylor
ExpressO
No abstract provided.
Learning The Wrong Lessons From "An American Tragedy": A Critique Of The Berger-Twerski Informed Choice Proposal, David E. Bernstein
Learning The Wrong Lessons From "An American Tragedy": A Critique Of The Berger-Twerski Informed Choice Proposal, David E. Bernstein
George Mason University School of Law Working Papers Series
This paper is a critique of Margaret Berger and Aaron Twerski, “Uncertainty and Informed Choice: Unmasking Daubert”, forthcoming the Michigan Law Review. Berger and Twerski propose that courts recognize a cause of action that would allow plaintiffs who claim injury from pharmaceutical products, but who do not have sufficient evidence to prove causation, to recover damages for deprivation of informed choice. Berger and Twerski claim inspiration from the litigation over allegations that the morning sickness drug Bendectin caused birth defects. Considering the criteria Berger and Twerski suggest for their proposed cause of action in the context of Bendectin, it appears …
Lying On The Stand Won't Cost You A Dime:Should Courts Recognize A Civil Action Intort For Perjury?
Lying On The Stand Won't Cost You A Dime:Should Courts Recognize A Civil Action Intort For Perjury?
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Recent Legislation
University of Richmond Law Review
This is a summary of the legislation that came out in 1968.
Evidence, Roslyn M. Litman
Evidence, Roslyn M. Litman
Scholarship
This article is not intended to constitute a comprehensive review of all evidence cases decided in Pennsylvania in the past ten years. The cases selected, of necessity, have been limited. They have been chosen because they affect either a field of special interest or one of special confusion. Cases dealing with applications of the parol evidence rule and with constitutional issues in criminal prosecutions have been omitted entirely because they are covered elsewhere in this Survey.
Recent Cases, Law Review Staff
Recent Cases, Law Review Staff
Vanderbilt Law Review
Antitrust Law--Violation of Section 7 of the Clayton Act by Joint Venture
==============================
Civil Rights--Anti-discrimination Law as a Vehicle for a Private Civil Action
==============================
Condemnation--Landowner Cannot Recover From Federal Government for Damages Caused Before Date of Taking Where Government Did Not Previously Contemplate, Condemning Property
==============================
Constitutional Law--Loss of Nationality--Foreign Residency Statute Held Violative of Due Process
==============================
Constitutional Law--Reapportionment--Both Houses of a State Legislature Must Be Based as Nearly as Is Practicable on Population
==============================
Constitutional Law--Twenty-first Amendment--Scope of State Power Over Intoxicants Moving Within Its Borders
==============================
Evidence--Statutory Presumptions--Reasonableness Is Implicit in Test of Rational Connection
============================== …
Abstracts Of Recent Cases, Charles Henry Rudolph Jr.
Abstracts Of Recent Cases, Charles Henry Rudolph Jr.
West Virginia Law Review
No abstract provided.
Recent Cases, Law Review Staff
Recent Cases, Law Review Staff
Vanderbilt Law Review
Constitutional Law--Due Process--Duty of Non-Resident Vendor to Collect Use Tax
==============================
Evidence--Criminal Law--Circumstantial Evidence Sufficient to Establish Corpus Delicti
==============================
Evidence--Presumptions--Rebuttable Presumption Persists Until Trier of Fact Finds Nonexistence of Presumed Fact as Probable as its Existence
==============================
Restraint of Trade--Sherman Act--Refusal to Sell as Unlawful Means of Effecting Price Maintenance
==============================
Torts--Negligence--Vendor of Alcoholic Beverage to Intoxicated Minor Liable to Third Party
Recent Cases, Law Review Staff
Recent Cases, Law Review Staff
Vanderbilt Law Review
CONFLICT OF LAWS--JURISDICTION--RESIDENCE AS A JURISDICTIONAL BASIS FOR DIVORCE
================================
CORPORATIONS-SECURITIES ACTS--DISTINCTION BETWEEN "CLASS" AND "SERIES" UNDER SECTION 16(b) OF SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT
================================
CORPORATIONS-STOCK DIVIDENDS-INCONSISTENCY BETWEEN TRADITIONAL AND MODERN CONCEPTS OF STOCK DIVIDENDS
================================
CRIMINAL PROCEDURE-EVIDENCE-STATUTORY LIMITATION OF JENCKS DECISION
================================
EVIDENCE--SEARCHES AND SEIZURES--INADMISSIBILITY IN FEDERAL COURT OF EVIDENCE OBTAINED THROUGH AN UNREASONABLE SEARCH BY STATE OFFICERS
================================
EVIDENCE--WITNESSES-ABILITY OF ONE SPOUSE TO TESTIFY AGAINST THE OTHER IN FEDERAL CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS
=================================
HABEAS CORPUS--FEDERAL COURT REMAND OF PETITIONER TO STATE COURT FOR NEW TRIAL
=================================
MUNICIPAL CORPORATIONS--TORT LIABILITY--DUTY TOPROVIDE POLICE PROTECTION TO INFORMERS
=================================
TAXATION--ESTATE TREASURY REGULATIONS ON GOVERNMENT …
Abstracts Of Recent Cases, L. S. D.
The Use Of Expert Evidence In Res Ipsa Loquitor Cases, Graham L. Fricke
The Use Of Expert Evidence In Res Ipsa Loquitor Cases, Graham L. Fricke
Villanova Law Review
No abstract provided.
Medical-Legal Relations - The Brighter Side, C. Joseph Stetler
Medical-Legal Relations - The Brighter Side, C. Joseph Stetler
Villanova Law Review
No abstract provided.
Recent Cases, Law Review Staff
Recent Cases, Law Review Staff
Vanderbilt Law Review
Constitutional Law--Congressional Investigations --Relevancy of Required Testimony
========================
Constitutional Law--State Taxation of Interstate Commerce--Sales Taxation of Income from Trans-Shipment of Goods within State
========================
Criminal Law--Felony Murder Doctrine--Co-Felon Killed by Victim of Crime
========================
Evidence--Judicial Admissions--Testimony as to Objective Facts
========================
Federal Tort Claims Act--"Private Individual" Clause--Uniquely Governmental Activity
========================
Income Taxation--Capital Gains and Losses--Business Purpose for Contracting in Commodity Futures
========================
Labor Law--Taft-Hartley Act--Discharge of Employees because of Union Membership
========================
Negligence--High Tension Power Lines--Duty to Warn of Dangerous Condition
========================
Real Property--Joint Tenancy--Severance of Estate by Murder of Co-Tenant
========================
Torts--Landowner--Duty to Social Guest
========================
Wills--Pretermitted Heir Statue--Sole …
An Ancient Therapy Still Applied: The Silent Medical Treatment, Melvin M. Belli
An Ancient Therapy Still Applied: The Silent Medical Treatment, Melvin M. Belli
Villanova Law Review
No abstract provided.
Torts - Malpractice - Medicolegal Relations - Expert Testimony, Francis R. O'Hara
Torts - Malpractice - Medicolegal Relations - Expert Testimony, Francis R. O'Hara
Villanova Law Review
No abstract provided.
Recent Cases, Law Review Staff
Recent Cases, Law Review Staff
Vanderbilt Law Review
A Commentary on Recent Case Law --By Subject:
Constitutional Law--Due Process--Use in State Prosecution of Evidence obtained by Illegal Invasion of Privacy
==============================
Constitutional Law--Unlawful Search and Seizure--Admissibility of Evidence for Impeachment Purposes
===============================
Evidence--Radar Evidence of Speed--Coincidence of Radar and Speedometer Readings as Hearsay
===============================
Federal Courts--State NonResident Motorist Statute--Waiver of Federal Venue Privilege
===============================
Federal Jurisdiction--Diversity of Citizenship--Retroactive Effect of Amendments to Perfect Jurisdiction
===============================
Income Taxation--Deductions--Periodic Alimony Payments
===============================
Labor Law--Preemptive Effect of Taft-Hartley--Scope of State Jurisdiction
===============================
Torts--Dog Bite--Owner's Scienter
===============================
Workmen's Compensation--Accident Arising out of Employment--Pre-Existing Heart Disease