Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Aeronautic law (1)
- Business organizations (1)
- Canon law (1)
- Choice of laws (1)
- Conflict of laws (1)
-
- Conflicts law (1)
- Contractual obligations (1)
- Corporations (1)
- Cotributory negligence (1)
- Damages (1)
- Foreign domicile (1)
- Foreign situs (1)
- Forum (1)
- Law of incorporation (1)
- Legal persons (1)
- Lex causae (1)
- Lex fori (1)
- Malaya (1)
- Maritime law (1)
- Negligence (1)
- Party autonomy (1)
- Public policy (1)
- Renvoi (1)
- Res ipsa loquitur (1)
- Roman law (1)
- Unilateralism (1)
- Unincorporated business organizations (1)
- Universal conflict rule (1)
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Torts
The Lex Fori - Basic Rule In The Conflict Of Laws, Albert A. Ehrenzweig
The Lex Fori - Basic Rule In The Conflict Of Laws, Albert A. Ehrenzweig
Michigan Law Review
The following summary of this thesis will show its essential connection with the progressing reform of the law of jurisdiction.
The Conflict Of Laws: A Comparative Study, Second Edition. Volume Two. Foreign Corporations: Torts: Contracts In General, Ernst Rabel
Michigan Legal Studies Series
The second volume of Ernst Rabel's comparative treatise on the conflict of laws was originally published in 1947. This new edition completes the plan to revise the first two volumes, as arranged with the approval of the author before his death on September 7, 1955. Pursuant to this plan, the present edition has been made possible through the continued support of the work by the University of Michigan Law School and the generous cooperation of the Max Planck-Institut für aüslindisches und internationales Privatrecht in Hamburg, in making available the competent services of a member of the staff of the Institut, …
Some Notes On The Malayan Law Of Negligence, A. E. S. Tay, J. H. M. Heah
Some Notes On The Malayan Law Of Negligence, A. E. S. Tay, J. H. M. Heah
Cleveland State Law Review
In the annals of the spread of the common law to other lands and other ways, Malaya may deserve a modest place, but, as the selection here no doubt shows, so far it has made no significant contribution to the intellectual content of that law. It has neither produced nor harboured a Cardozo or a Dixon. At best, its judges have applied common law principles simply but soundly; they have never, at least in tort, been subtle or illuminating. Its legal history is of interest for its own sake; its legal achievement awaits us in the future, not in the …