Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Common law (2)
- Liability (2)
- Anglo-American law (1)
- Bioethics (1)
- Biopharmaceutical Companies (1)
-
- Biopharmaceutical Products (1)
- Business Ethics (1)
- CDTR (1)
- Chattels (1)
- Common Law (1)
- Corporate Duty To Rescue (1)
- Damages (1)
- FDA (1)
- Food and Drug Administration (1)
- Health Law (1)
- Intellectual Property (1)
- Intention (Law) (1)
- Intentional tort (1)
- Interchangeable intent (1)
- Law -- United States -- Interpretation & constructio (1)
- Law of Torts (1)
- Law teachers -- Attitudes (1)
- Medications (1)
- Patent Rights (1)
- Patient Assistance Programs (1)
- Prosser myth (1)
- Restatement (Second) of Torts (1)
- Restatement of Torts (1)
- Restatements of the law (1)
- Tort law (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Torts
A Corporate Duty To Rescue: Biopharmaceutical Companies And Access To Medications, Rebecca E. Wolitz
A Corporate Duty To Rescue: Biopharmaceutical Companies And Access To Medications, Rebecca E. Wolitz
Indiana Law Journal
Controversies regarding the pricing of biopharmaceutical products are pervasive. Patients must choose between treatment and rent, prescriptions go unfilled, and health systems are forced to restrict access to life-saving medications— all because of cost. Though there is often consensus that these issues are problematic, there is disagreement as to what are appropriate solutions and who has responsibility to bring about those solutions. Most efforts to address biopharmaceutical pricing concerns focus on governmental regulation. This Article has a different focus. It provides a legal and normative analysis of a form of corporate self-regulation that could help address access and pricing concerns—a …
The Prosser Myth Of Transferred Intent, Peter B. Kutner
The Prosser Myth Of Transferred Intent, Peter B. Kutner
Indiana Law Journal
The main theme of this Article is that Prosser advanced a mythical doctrine of transferred intent. What Prosser asserted to be the law was not the law when he wrote his article on transferred intent and amended his treatise. The cases he relied on to support his conclusions on transferred intent did not support them. Moreover, despite Prosser’s great influence on American tort law, Prosser’s position on transferred intent is not the law now and should not be. Its consequences are undesirable. Recognition of transferred intent as a basis of liability is due primarily to its inclusion in the First …
Liability In Anglo-American Law For Damage Done By Chattels, Fowler V. Harper
Liability In Anglo-American Law For Damage Done By Chattels, Fowler V. Harper
Articles by Maurer Faculty
No abstract provided.