Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Annual Survey of Virginia Law (2)
- Index (2)
- UCC (2)
- Article 2 (1)
- Article 7 (1)
-
- Bankruptcy court (1)
- Businesses (1)
- Buyer (1)
- Class Action Fairness Act of 2005 (1)
- Consumers (1)
- Cosigner (1)
- Daubert (1)
- Diversity (1)
- Friedman v. Peoples Service Drug Stores (1)
- Hybrid sales (1)
- Judicial decisions (1)
- Liability remedies (1)
- Predominant purpose test (1)
- Privity (1)
- Pro se litigation (1)
- Products liabilities (1)
- Residency (1)
- Secured creditor (1)
- Service cases (1)
- Subpoena (1)
- Tort (1)
- Tyler v. Street (1)
- U.C.C. (1)
- Uniform Commercial Code (1)
- Virginia Code section 8.2- 316 (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 6 of 6
Full-Text Articles in Torts
Proposed Legislation: A (Second) Modest Proposal To Protect Virginia Consumers Against Defective Products, Peter N. Swisher
Proposed Legislation: A (Second) Modest Proposal To Protect Virginia Consumers Against Defective Products, Peter N. Swisher
Law Faculty Publications
The purpose of this article is to suggest a viable, necessary, and eminently reasonable legislative alternative that the Virginia General Assembly should enact for legitimate and pressing public policy reasons in order to properly protect Virginia consumers from defective and unreasonably dangerous consumer products. Adopting this alternative would bring the Commonwealth of Virginia into the mainstream of twenty-first century American, and transnational, products liability law.
Product Liability Law, Gary J. Spahn, Brent M. Timberlake
Product Liability Law, Gary J. Spahn, Brent M. Timberlake
University of Richmond Law Review
While Virginia is not typically seen as "progressive" in the field of product liability law, the Commonwealth is nonetheless a forum in which these product liability battles take place. This article summarizes selected decisions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, federal district courts in Virginia, and courts of the Commonwealth issued between July 1, 2004 and May 15, 2005. This article also includes a discussion of the most relevant legislative changes made by the Virginia General Assembly over the same time period. While a complete analysis of every decision and statute affecting product liability is …
University Of Richmond Law Review
University Of Richmond Law Review
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
University Of Richmond Law Review
University Of Richmond Law Review
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
U.C.C. Survey: General Provisions, Bulk Transfers, And Documents Of Title, David Frisch
U.C.C. Survey: General Provisions, Bulk Transfers, And Documents Of Title, David Frisch
Law Faculty Publications
The 1986 Annual Survey described the "check it back to local law" approach to the Code's choice of law rules. Recent cases emphasize this. For example, in Madaus v. November Hill Farm, lnc., the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Virginia applied the Virginia pre-Code conflict of laws rules to a dispute between a West German seller of a horse and a Virginia buyer. The court applied the Virginia rule that the law applicable to the validity of a contract is the law of the jurisdiction where the final act necessary to make the contract binding was done. …
Uniform Commercial Code- Breach Of Warranty- Applicable Statute Of Limitations For Personal Injury
Uniform Commercial Code- Breach Of Warranty- Applicable Statute Of Limitations For Personal Injury
University of Richmond Law Review
Statutes of limitation are statutes of repose, the object of which is to compel the exercise of a right of action within a reasonable time. They are designed to suppress fraudulent and stale claims from being asserted after a great lapse of time, to the surprise of the parties, when the evidence may have been lost, the facts may have become obscure because of defective memory, or the witnesses have died or dis- appeared.