Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Supreme Court of the United States Commons™
Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Education Law (10)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (9)
- Law and Race (8)
- Constitutional Law (3)
- Fourteenth Amendment (2)
-
- Jurisprudence (2)
- American Politics (1)
- Civil Procedure (1)
- Courts (1)
- Criminal Procedure (1)
- Education (1)
- Educational Administration and Supervision (1)
- Educational Leadership (1)
- First Amendment (1)
- Higher Education (1)
- Higher Education Administration (1)
- Judges (1)
- Law and Society (1)
- Legal Profession (1)
- Litigation (1)
- Political Science (1)
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (1)
- Social and Philosophical Foundations of Education (1)
- State and Local Government Law (1)
- Institution
Articles 1 - 13 of 13
Full-Text Articles in Supreme Court of the United States
Revisiting The “Tradition Of Local Control” In Public Education, Carter Brace
Revisiting The “Tradition Of Local Control” In Public Education, Carter Brace
Michigan Law Review
In Milliken v. Bradley, the Supreme Court declared “local control” the single most important tradition of public education. Milliken and other related cases developed this notion of a tradition, which has frustrated attempts to achieve equitable school funding and desegregation through federal courts. However, despite its significant impact on American education, most scholars have treated the “tradition of local control” as doctrinally insignificant. These scholars depict the tradition either as a policy preference with no formal legal meaning or as one principle among many that courts may use to determine equitable remedies. This Note argues that the Supreme Court …
Book Review: Courtrooms And Classrooms: A Legal History Of College Access, 1860-1960, Mark A. Addison
Book Review: Courtrooms And Classrooms: A Legal History Of College Access, 1860-1960, Mark A. Addison
Journal of College Access
Issues of college access are increasingly met with resolutions within social and economic contexts. Models such as cost of production output, and race and socioeconomic-conscious strategies form the basis of such analyses (Jenkins & Rodriguez, 2013; Henriksen, 1995; Treager Huber, 2010; Schmidt, 2012). We can expect retooling and reinventing of such models with increasing college costs and changes in student demographics.
(Still) Constitutional School De-Segregation Strategies: Teaching Racial Literacy To Secondary School Students And Preferencing Racially-Literate Applicants To Higher Education, Michael J. Kaufman
(Still) Constitutional School De-Segregation Strategies: Teaching Racial Literacy To Secondary School Students And Preferencing Racially-Literate Applicants To Higher Education, Michael J. Kaufman
Michigan Journal of Race and Law
In Parents Involved in Community Schools v. Seattle School Dist. No. 1, the Supreme Court declared that it will continue to scrutinize race-conscious educational decisions to insure that they are narrowly-tailored to serve a compelling governmental interest. This Article develops a strategy for enhancing racial diversity at all levels of American public education that can survive that rigorous constitutional scrutiny. The Article shows that school districts may prove that assigning a meaningful number of racially diverse students to their secondary schools is narrowly-tailored to achieve their compelling educational interest in teaching racial literacy. The constitutionality of this race-conscious educational …
Introduction: Brown Is Dead? Long Live Brown!, Denise C. Morgan
Introduction: Brown Is Dead? Long Live Brown!, Denise C. Morgan
NYLS Law Review
No abstract provided.
Are Reports Of Brown‘S Demise Exaggerated? Perspectives Of A School Desegregation Litigator, Dennis D. Parker
Are Reports Of Brown‘S Demise Exaggerated? Perspectives Of A School Desegregation Litigator, Dennis D. Parker
NYLS Law Review
No abstract provided.
Why Segregation Is Inherently Unequal: The Abandonment Of Brown And The Continuing Failure Of Plessy, Gary Orfield
Why Segregation Is Inherently Unequal: The Abandonment Of Brown And The Continuing Failure Of Plessy, Gary Orfield
NYLS Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Unintended Lessons In Brown V. Board Of Education, Derrick A. Bell Jr.
The Unintended Lessons In Brown V. Board Of Education, Derrick A. Bell Jr.
NYLS Law Review
No abstract provided.
Environmental Justice And The Integration Ideal, Rachel D. Godsil
Environmental Justice And The Integration Ideal, Rachel D. Godsil
NYLS Law Review
No abstract provided.
Is Brown Dying? Exploring The Resegregation Trend In Our Public Schools, Danielle R. Holley
Is Brown Dying? Exploring The Resegregation Trend In Our Public Schools, Danielle R. Holley
NYLS Law Review
No abstract provided.
Brown And The Desegregation Of Virginia Law Schools, Carl W. Tobias
Brown And The Desegregation Of Virginia Law Schools, Carl W. Tobias
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
Section 1983, Honorable George C. Pratt, Martin A. Schwartz, Leon Friedman
Section 1983, Honorable George C. Pratt, Martin A. Schwartz, Leon Friedman
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Discrimination In The Hiring And Assignment Of Teachers In Public School Systems, Michigan Law Review
Discrimination In The Hiring And Assignment Of Teachers In Public School Systems, Michigan Law Review
Michigan Law Review
In the Brown v. Board of Education decisions of 1954 and 1955, the United States Supreme Court made it clear that separate public school facilities for pupils of different races are inherently unequal and constitute a denial of the equal protection of the laws. While it was not altogether clear from the language of the opinions whether segregated faculties in public schools are also unconstitutional, subsequent lower court decisions have held that racial discrimination in the selection and assignment of teachers is forbidden.
Hyneman: The Supreme Court On Trial, William W. Van Alstyne
Hyneman: The Supreme Court On Trial, William W. Van Alstyne
Michigan Law Review
A Review of The Supreme Court on Trial. By Charles S. Hyneman