Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Supreme Court of the United States Commons™
Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Judges (5)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (4)
- Constitutional Law (2)
- Criminal Procedure (2)
- Fourteenth Amendment (2)
-
- Law and Gender (2)
- Law and Politics (2)
- Legal Education (2)
- Legal History (2)
- Banking and Finance Law (1)
- Civil Procedure (1)
- Construction Law (1)
- Courts (1)
- Criminal Law (1)
- Election Law (1)
- Human Rights Law (1)
- Jurisprudence (1)
- Labor and Employment Law (1)
- Land Use Law (1)
- Law and Economics (1)
- Law and Philosophy (1)
- Law and Psychology (1)
- Law and Society (1)
- Legal Writing and Research (1)
- Litigation (1)
- Property Law and Real Estate (1)
- Religion Law (1)
- Social Welfare Law (1)
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- Supreme Court (6)
- Citron (3)
- Ginsburg (3)
- Justice Ginsburg (3)
- RBG (3)
-
- Rodger Citron (3)
- Ruth Bader Ginsburg (3)
- ACLU (2)
- Brown v. Board of Education (2)
- Discrimination (2)
- Dissent (2)
- Equal protection (2)
- Politics (2)
- Sex discrimination (2)
- Title VII (2)
- 1995 bombing (1)
- Abortion (1)
- African Americans (1)
- Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building (1)
- All-Black towns (1)
- American Law (1)
- American civil liberties union (1)
- Amy Coney Barrett (1)
- And Comparative Jewish Law (1)
- Bias (1)
- Bill Clinton (1)
- Biltmore Hotel (1)
- Black Codes (1)
- Brown: Sipuel v. Board of Regents (1)
- Burkean minimalism (1)
Articles 1 - 9 of 9
Full-Text Articles in Supreme Court of the United States
Trump V. Mazars Usa, Llp: The Case Of The Chief Justice And The Congressional Subpoenas, Rodger D. Citron
Trump V. Mazars Usa, Llp: The Case Of The Chief Justice And The Congressional Subpoenas, Rodger D. Citron
Scholarly Works
No abstract provided.
Justice Ginsburg, Civil Procedure Professor And Champion Of Judicial Federalism, Rodger D. Citron
Justice Ginsburg, Civil Procedure Professor And Champion Of Judicial Federalism, Rodger D. Citron
Scholarly Works
No abstract provided.
Nestlé United States, Inc. V. Doe. 141 S. Ct. 1931 (2021), Desiree Leclercq
Nestlé United States, Inc. V. Doe. 141 S. Ct. 1931 (2021), Desiree Leclercq
Scholarly Works
On June 17, 2021, the United States Supreme Court reversed and remanded a suit filed against Nestlé USA and Cargill under the Alien Tort Statute (ATS) 1 for lack of jurisdiction. This case has already garnered attention over the nature of the dispute (child slaves in Africa), the Supreme Court’s treatment of jurisdiction under the ATS, and the finding shared by five of the nine Supreme Court justices that domestic corporations can potentially be sued under the ATS. This analysis focuses on the child slavery and global supply chain aspects of the decision.
Seeking Economic Justice In The Face Of Enduring Racism, Deseriee A. Kennedy
Seeking Economic Justice In The Face Of Enduring Racism, Deseriee A. Kennedy
Scholarly Works
No abstract provided.
Rbg And Gender Discrimination, Eileen Kaufman
Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Wise Legal Giant, Thomas A. Schweitzer
Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Wise Legal Giant, Thomas A. Schweitzer
Scholarly Works
No abstract provided.
Nine Ways Of Looking At Oklahoma City: An Essay On Sam Anderson’S Boom Town, Rodger D. Citron
Nine Ways Of Looking At Oklahoma City: An Essay On Sam Anderson’S Boom Town, Rodger D. Citron
Scholarly Works
No abstract provided.
Rabbi Lamm, The Fifth Amendment, And Comparative Jewish Law, Samuel J. Levine
Rabbi Lamm, The Fifth Amendment, And Comparative Jewish Law, Samuel J. Levine
Scholarly Works
Rabbi Norman Lamm’s 1956 article, “The Fifth Amendment and Its Equivalent in the Halakha,” provides important lessons for scholarship in both Jewish and American law. Sixty-five years after it was published, the article remains, in many ways, a model for interdisciplinary and comparative study of Jewish law, drawing upon sources in the Jewish legal tradition, American legal history, and modern psychology. In so doing, the article proves faithful to each discipline on its own terms, producing insights that illuminate all three disciplines while respecting the internal logic within each one. In addition to many other distinctions, since its initial publication, …
"Our Most Sacred Legal Commitments": A Digital Exploration Of The U.S. Supreme Court Defining Who We Are And How They Should Opine, Eric C. Nystrom, David S. Tanenhaus
"Our Most Sacred Legal Commitments": A Digital Exploration Of The U.S. Supreme Court Defining Who We Are And How They Should Opine, Eric C. Nystrom, David S. Tanenhaus
Scholarly Works
This Article focuses on uncovering the multiple meanings of the word "our" in the published opinions of the U.S. Supreme Court from Chisholm to modern times. To do so, we use a digital legal history approach, combining robust court data, text mining techniques, and expert word classification, using a set of custom open-source tools and open data.