Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Supreme Court of the United States Commons™
Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
- Keyword
-
- United States Supreme Court (18)
- Police (5)
- Searches (5)
- Seizures (5)
- Burger Court (3)
-
- Constitution (3)
- Exclusionary rule (3)
- Warren Court (3)
- Brandeis (Louis) (2)
- Capital punishment (2)
- Death penalty (2)
- Income tax (2)
- Mapp v. Ohio (2)
- Access to information (1)
- Admissibility (1)
- Appellate courts (1)
- Badaracco v. Commissioner (1)
- Civics (1)
- Collective bargaining (1)
- Confessions (1)
- Consitutional violations (1)
- Custodial interrogation (1)
- Custodial interrogations (1)
- Defendant writ applications (1)
- Discrimination (1)
- Dissenting opinions (1)
- Douglas v. California (1)
- Employee rights (1)
- Employment discrimination (1)
- Equity (1)
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 19 of 19
Full-Text Articles in Supreme Court of the United States
Dissenting Opinions By Supreme Court Justices In Federal Income Tax Controversies, Walter J. Blum
Dissenting Opinions By Supreme Court Justices In Federal Income Tax Controversies, Walter J. Blum
Michigan Law Review
What is to be learned from this review of the various analyses offered in dissenting tax opinions over the past five terms of the Supreme Court? When the Court has decisively interpreted narrow or technical language in the statute, dissenters all too often indulge in lengthy analyses that can only serve to create further confusion. Only when the Court focuses on a judicially made rule or an issue with constitutional implications is a broader dissent appropriate. If dissenters generally adhered to the guidelines set forth at the outset of this Article the tax world would, I believe, be at least …
The Supreme Court's Misconstruction Of A Procedural Statute--A Critique Of The Court's Decision In Badaracco, Douglas A. Kahn
The Supreme Court's Misconstruction Of A Procedural Statute--A Critique Of The Court's Decision In Badaracco, Douglas A. Kahn
Michigan Law Review
Before addressing the lessons to be derived from Badaracco, it is necessary to make good on the author's claim that it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of a reasonably skeptical reader that the Court's decision was patently wrong and resulted from a poor technique of statutory construction. This is a heavy burden, especially since the decision was reached by an overwhelming majority of the Court and since two courts of appeals and at least one student law review note reached the same result. The reader must judge whether the author succeeds in satisfying it. This Article will first …
An Essay On The Conceptual Foundations Of The Tax Benefit Rule, Patricia D. White
An Essay On The Conceptual Foundations Of The Tax Benefit Rule, Patricia D. White
Michigan Law Review
My aim in this essay is to explore the foundations of the tax benefit notion. My strategy is simple, but it is probably best to state it explicitly at the outset. I begin with a straightforward and uncontroversial example of the application of the "inclusionary aspect" of the tax benefit rule. Using it as a paradigm, I try to discern why the law deems it appropriate to increase a taxpayer's taxable income. Next I examine the account of the tax benefit rule given by the Supreme Court in Hillsboro to see if it is consistent with the paradigm. I conclude …
Refining The Lawmaking Function Of The Supreme Court, Frederick Schauer
Refining The Lawmaking Function Of The Supreme Court, Frederick Schauer
University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform
In this Article, I will address this second type of lawmaking. I want to explore the ways in which the Supreme Court, in its opinions, does and can guide the conduct of lower courts, legislatures, government agencies, government employees, and the public at large. Each of these groups, and others, is likely at times to have some direct need to know what the law is. And to the extent that part of our law is set forth in the opinions of the Supreme Court, this aspect of the craft of lawmaking should not be ignored. Although it is common in …
The Fourth Amendment As A Device For Protecting The Innocent, Arnold H. Loewy
The Fourth Amendment As A Device For Protecting The Innocent, Arnold H. Loewy
Michigan Law Review
Part I of this Article establishes that the government has a right to search for and seize evidence of crime. Part II develops the corollary proposition that the fourth amendment does not protect the right to secrete evidence of crime. Part III explores the impact of the reasonable expectation of privacy concept on the innocent. Part IV evaluates consent searches and their effect on the innocent. Finally, Part V considers the exclusionary rule as a device for protecting the innocent.
Forgotten Points In The "Exclusionary Rule" Debate, James Boyd White
Forgotten Points In The "Exclusionary Rule" Debate, James Boyd White
Michigan Law Review
Most contemporary discussions of the "exclusionary rule" assume or assert that this "rule" is not part of the fourth amendment, nor required by its terms, but is rather a judicial "remedy" that was fashioned to protect those rights (against unreasonable search and seizure) that actually are granted by the fourth amendment. The protection is said to work by "deterring" official violations; this is, however, an odd use of the word, for the rule does not punish violations but merely deprives the government of some of the benefits that might ensue from them, namely the use in the criminal case of …
Of Standards For Extra-Judicial Behavior, Russell R. Wheeler
Of Standards For Extra-Judicial Behavior, Russell R. Wheeler
Michigan Law Review
A Review of The Brandeis/Frankfurter Connection: The Secret Political Activities of Two Supreme Court Justices by Bruce Allen Murphy
Louis D. Brandeis And The Progressive Tradition, Michigan Law Review
Louis D. Brandeis And The Progressive Tradition, Michigan Law Review
Michigan Law Review
A Review of Louis D. Brandeis and the Progressive Tradition by Melvin I. Urofsky
Equity And The Constitution, Michigan Law Review
Equity And The Constitution, Michigan Law Review
Michigan Law Review
A Review of Equity and the Constitution by Gary L. McDowell
On Supreme Court Commentaries And Developing Constitutional Law, David M. O'Brien
On Supreme Court Commentaries And Developing Constitutional Law, David M. O'Brien
Michigan Law Review
A Review of The Supreme Court: Trends and Developments, Volume 3: 1980-1981 by Jesse Choper, Yale Kamisar, and Laurance Tribe
The Public's Right To Know: The Supreme Court As Pandora?, Loren P. Beth
The Public's Right To Know: The Supreme Court As Pandora?, Loren P. Beth
Michigan Law Review
A Review of The Public's Right to Know: The Supreme Court and the First Amendment by David M. O'Brien
Hail To The Chief: Earl Warren And The Supreme Court, Dennis J. Hutchinson
Hail To The Chief: Earl Warren And The Supreme Court, Dennis J. Hutchinson
Michigan Law Review
A Review of Earl Warren: A Public Life by G. Edward White, and Super Chief: Earl Warren and His Supreme Court--A Judicial Biography by Bernard Schwartz
Berger's Defense Of The Death Penalty: How Not To Read The Constitution, Hugo Adam Bedau
Berger's Defense Of The Death Penalty: How Not To Read The Constitution, Hugo Adam Bedau
Michigan Law Review
A Review of Death Penalties: The Supreme Court's Obstacle Course by Raoul Berger
The Death Penalty In America, Michigan Law Review
The Death Penalty In America, Michigan Law Review
Michigan Law Review
A Review of The Death Penalty in America (Third Edition) by Hugo Adam Bedau
Individual Rights In The Work Place: The Burger Court And Labor Law, Theodore J. St. Antoine
Individual Rights In The Work Place: The Burger Court And Labor Law, Theodore J. St. Antoine
Book Chapters
The Supreme Court, like other institutions, must play the part that the times demand, often with small regard for the personal predilections of its membership. The Warren Court and the Burger Court, in their respective contributions to the law of union-employer-employee relations, almost reversed the roles they might have been expected to assume. The major accomplishment of the Court in the labor area during the Warren era was a fundamental restructuring of intergovernmental relationships, while the Court's overriding concern throughout the Burger decade of the 1970s and beyond has been the defining of individual rights in the work place.
The Warren Court (Was It Really So Defense-Minded?), The Burger Court (Is It Really So Prosecution-Oriented?), And Police Investigatory Practices, Yale Kamisar
Book Chapters
In one sense the Warren Court's "revolution" in American criminal procedure may be said to. have been launched by the 1956 case of Griffin v. Illinois (establishing an indigent criminal defendant's right to a free transcript on appeal, at least under certain circumstances) and to have been significantly advanced by two 1963 cases: Gideon v. Wainwright (entitling an indigent defendant to free counsel, at least in serious criminal cases) and Douglas v. California (requiring a state to provide an indigent with counsel on his first appeal from a criminal conviction). But these were not the cases that plunged the Warren …
Does (Did) (Should) The Exclusionary Rule Rest On A 'Principled Basis' Rather Than An 'Empirical Proposition'?, Yale Kamisar
Does (Did) (Should) The Exclusionary Rule Rest On A 'Principled Basis' Rather Than An 'Empirical Proposition'?, Yale Kamisar
Articles
[U]ntil the [exclusionary rule] rests on a principled basis rather than an empirical proposition, [the rule] will remain in a state of unstable equilibrium. Mapp v. Ohio, which overruled the then twelve-year-old Wolf case and imposed the fourth amendment exclusionary rule (the Weeks doctrine) on the states as a matter of fourteenth amendment due process, seemed to mark the end of an era. Concurring in Mapp, Justice Douglas recalled that Wolf had evoked "a storm of constitutional controversy which only today finds its end."' But in the two decades since Justice Douglas made this observation, the storm of controversy has …
Criminal Procedure, The Burger Court, And The Legacy Of The Warren Court, Jerold H. Israel
Criminal Procedure, The Burger Court, And The Legacy Of The Warren Court, Jerold H. Israel
Book Chapters
Richard Nixon's criticism of the Warren Court during the 1968 presidential campaign centered largely on the Court's handling of cases involving criminal rights. According to candidate Nixon, the Court had gone much too far. It had twisted the Constitution to serve its own purposes, created a maze of legal technicalities that worked only to frustrate legitimate law enforcement efforts, and so weakened "the peace forces as against the criminal forces in this country" as to be largely responsible for the sharp rise in crime that had occurred in the sixties. What had to be done, continued Nixon, was to appoint …
Extraordinary Writ Practice In Criminal Cases: Analogies For The Military Courts, Edward H. Cooper
Extraordinary Writ Practice In Criminal Cases: Analogies For The Military Courts, Edward H. Cooper
Articles
Extraordinary writs have two central functions in the hands of appellate courts. One is to enforce the court's mandate; there is no particular difficulty with this use of the writs, and no more need be said about it. The other function is to circumvent the ordinary channels of appellate review. In this function, writs operate as appeals in all but name. As this use has become more and more routine, it would be more appropriate to speak of them as "appeals writs" rather than extraordinary writs. My assignment is to speak of the experience with appeals writs in criminal cases …