Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Supreme Court of the United States Commons™
Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
- Keyword
-
- Supreme court (2)
- Antonin (1)
- Article 3 (1)
- Article III (1)
- California (1)
-
- California legislation (1)
- Civil rights (1)
- Concrete injury (1)
- Constitution (1)
- Consumer reporting agency (1)
- Credit (1)
- D.c. v. heller (1)
- Employment (1)
- Excessive force (1)
- FCRA (1)
- Federal statute (1)
- Gun (1)
- Gun control (1)
- Gun policy (1)
- Gun regulation (1)
- Heller (1)
- Idaho (1)
- Idaho Supreme Court (1)
- Insurance (1)
- Justice (1)
- Memory (1)
- Police brutality (1)
- Right to bear arms (1)
- Scalia (1)
- Second amendment (1)
Articles 1 - 4 of 4
Full-Text Articles in Supreme Court of the United States
Gun Rights Or Gun Control? How California's Waiting Period Law Can Pave The Way To Increased Regulation, Natasha Tran
Gun Rights Or Gun Control? How California's Waiting Period Law Can Pave The Way To Increased Regulation, Natasha Tran
Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review
No abstract provided.
Foreword: In Memory Of Justice Antonin Scalia, Steven G. Calabresi
Foreword: In Memory Of Justice Antonin Scalia, Steven G. Calabresi
Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review
No abstract provided.
Supreme Court Supremacy In A Time Of Turmoil: James V. City Of Boise, Richard Henry Seamon
Supreme Court Supremacy In A Time Of Turmoil: James V. City Of Boise, Richard Henry Seamon
Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review
Last Term’s decision in James v. City of Boise encapsulates the current civil rights turmoil and the legal system’s inadequate response to it. In James ̧ the U.S. Supreme Court reversed a decision in which the Idaho Supreme Court (1) awarded attorney’s fees against a civil rights plaintiff despite her credible claim of excessive police force and (2) denied that it was bound by U.S. Supreme Court decisions interpreting the federal statute authorizing the award. Although the Court in James reaffirmed the state courts’ well-settled duty to obey the Court’s decisions on federal law, this article shows that the duty …
Spokeo Misspeaks, Lauren E. Willis
Spokeo Misspeaks, Lauren E. Willis
Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review
Most commentators have critiqued the Supreme Court’s opinion in Spokeo, Inc. v. Robins for failing to answer the question presented. But in important ways, the Spokeo opinion does not merely fail to speak—it affirmatively misspeaks. This essay suggests that underlying the Justices’ inability to see how standing law ought to apply to the facts in Spokeo is a failure to appreciate the power that consumer reports have over individuals’ life prospects today. Worse, the Justices’ unawareness of their own ignorance leads them to afford Congress little deference in identifying injuries occurring in our new information society. Their meta-ignorance also induces …