Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Supreme Court of the United States Commons™
Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Access to justice (1)
- Antitrust (1)
- Cannabis Law (1)
- Civil claims (1)
- Civil courts (1)
-
- Constitution (1)
- Domestic Violence Services and the Law (1)
- Economics (1)
- Filing Fees (1)
- First Amendment (1)
- Immigration Reform (1)
- In forma pauperis (1)
- Redress (1)
- Reverse Discrimination Claims (1)
- Right to Petition (1)
- Right to file (1)
- Supreme Court (1)
- Systemic Racism (1)
- The Participation Principle (1)
- Zoning Laws (1)
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Supreme Court of the United States
Why Do The Poor Not Have A Constitutional Right To File Civil Claims In Court Under Their First Amendment Right To Petition The Government For A Redress Of Grievances?, Henry Rose
Seattle University Law Review
Since 1963, the United States Supreme Court has recognized a constitutional right for American groups, organizations, and persons to pursue civil litigation under the First Amendment right to petition the government for redress of grievances. However, in three cases involving poor plaintiffs decided by the Supreme Court in the early 1970s—Boddie v. Connecticut,2 United States v. Kras,3 and Ortwein v. Schwab4—the Supreme Court rejected arguments that all persons have a constitutional right to access courts to pursue their civil legal claims.5 In the latter two cases, Kras and Ortwein, the Supreme Court concluded that poor persons were properly barred from …
Table Of Contents, Seattle University Law Review
Table Of Contents, Seattle University Law Review
Seattle University Law Review
Table of Contents
Table Of Contents, Seattle University Law Review
Table Of Contents, Seattle University Law Review
Seattle University Law Review
Table of Contents.