Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Supreme Court of the United States Commons™
Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Bad faith (1)
- Bumper v. North Carolina (1)
- Coercion (1)
- Colorado v. Connelly (1)
- Confession (1)
-
- Consent (1)
- Drug trafficking (1)
- Drugs (1)
- Equal Protection Clause (1)
- Good faith (1)
- Hit rates (1)
- Interrogation (1)
- Johnson v. United States (1)
- Maryland State Conference of NAACP Branches v. Maryland State Police (1)
- McCleskey v. Kemp (1)
- Minorities (1)
- Miranda v. Arizona (1)
- Operation Pipeline (1)
- Police officers (1)
- Privacy (1)
- Probable cause (1)
- Probable-cause (1)
- Schneckloth v. Bustamonte (1)
- Scope (1)
- State v. Soto (1)
- Traffic stop (1)
- Underreporting (1)
- United States v. Brignoni-Ponce (1)
- United States v. Martinez-Fuerte (1)
Articles 1 - 2 of 2
Full-Text Articles in Supreme Court of the United States
Road Work: Racial Profiling And Drug Interdiction On The Highway, Samuel R. Gross, Katherine Y. Barnes
Road Work: Racial Profiling And Drug Interdiction On The Highway, Samuel R. Gross, Katherine Y. Barnes
Michigan Law Review
Hypocrisy about race is hardly new in America, but the content changes. Recently the spotlight has been on racial profiling. The story of Colonel Carl Williams of the New Jersey State Police is a wellknown example. On Sunday, February 28, 1999, the Newark Star Ledger published a lengthy interview with Williams in which he talked about race and drugs: "Today . . . the drug problem is cocaine or marijuana. It is most likely a minority group that's involved with that. " Williams condemned racial profiling - "As far as racial profiling is concerned, that is absolutely not right. It …
We Can Do This The Easy Way Or The Hard Way: The Use Of Deceit To Induce Consent Searches, Rebecca Strauss
We Can Do This The Easy Way Or The Hard Way: The Use Of Deceit To Induce Consent Searches, Rebecca Strauss
Michigan Law Review
In October of 1995, Aaron Salvo was studying and living at Ashland College. College officials informed local FBI agents that they suspected Salvo of possible child molestation and related conduct based on incriminating electronic mail. FBI agents approached Salvo at his dormitory, asked to speak with him in private about the suspicious mail, and suggested they speak in Salvo's dorm room. Salvo agreed to speak with the officers, but declined to do so in his room because his roommate was there, and he did not want to get anyone else involved in the embarrassing nature of the upcoming conversation. Salvo …