Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Supreme Court of the United States Commons™
Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Class action (1)
- Constitutional adjudication (1)
- Diversity jurisdiction (1)
- Doremus v. Board of Education (1)
- Entity theory (1)
-
- Everson v. Board of Education (1)
- Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (1)
- Federalism (1)
- Incorporated association (1)
- Jackson (Robert) (1)
- Judicial activism (1)
- Judicial review (1)
- Jurisdictional limitation (1)
- McCollum v. Board of Education (1)
- Minority rule (1)
- Non-diversity case (1)
- Pritchett (C.H.) (1)
- Separation of powers (1)
- Sherman Act (1)
- Sperry Products Inc. v. Association of American Railroads (1)
- Stare decisis (1)
- Strawbridge v. Curtiss (1)
- United Mine Workers v. Coronado Coal Co. (1)
- Venue (1)
- Zorach v. Clauson (1)
Articles 1 - 2 of 2
Full-Text Articles in Supreme Court of the United States
Suits Against Unincorporated Associations Under The Federal Rules Of Civil Procedure, John Kaplan
Suits Against Unincorporated Associations Under The Federal Rules Of Civil Procedure, John Kaplan
Michigan Law Review
Concepts, Benjamin Cardozo has said, "are useful, indeed indispensable, if kept within their place. We will press them quite a distance. . . . A time comes, however, when the concepts carry us too far, or farther than we are ready to go with them, and behold, some other concept, with capacity to serve our needs is waiting at the gate. 'It is a peculiar virtue of our system of law that the process of inclusion and exclusion, so often employed in developing a rule, is not allowed to end with its enunciation, and that an expression in an opinion …
Justice Jackson And The Judicial Function, Paul A. Weidner
Justice Jackson And The Judicial Function, Paul A. Weidner
Michigan Law Review
Much of the pattern of division in the present Supreme Court is traceable to basic differences of opinion regarding the proper role of a judge in the process of constitutional adjudication. Some students of the Court, yielding to the current fashion of reducing even intricate problems to capsule terms, have tried to explain the controversy by classifying the justices as either "liberals" or "conservatives." A second school poses the disagreement largely in terms of judicial "activism" as opposed to judicial "restraint." It is this view that has the greater relevance for the present discussion. C.H. Pritchett, one of the leading …