Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Supreme Court of the United States Commons™
Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- Brown v. Board of Education (2)
- Due Process Clause (2)
- Equal Protection Clause (2)
- Affirmative Action (1)
- Custody (1)
-
- Discrimination (1)
- Dowbiggin (Ian) (1)
- Dred Scott v. Sandford (1)
- Dred Scott v. Sanford (1)
- Equal protection (1)
- Equality (1)
- Eugenics (1)
- Family (1)
- Federal Indian law (1)
- Fourteenth Amendment (1)
- Grutter v. Bollinger (1)
- Interracial marriage (1)
- Jurisprudence (1)
- Kamisar (Yale) (1)
- LGBTQ (1)
- Lawrence v. Texas (1)
- Liberty (1)
- Loving v. Virginia (1)
- Marriage (1)
- Native American rights (1)
- Native Americans (1)
- New York (1)
- Public education (1)
- Racial apartheid (1)
- Regents of the University of California v. Bakke (1)
Articles 1 - 5 of 5
Full-Text Articles in Supreme Court of the United States
Foreword: Loving Lawrence, Pamela S. Karlan
Foreword: Loving Lawrence, Pamela S. Karlan
Michigan Law Review
Two interracial couples. Two cases. Two clauses. In Loving v. Virginia, the Supreme Court struck down a Virginia statute outlawing interracial marriage. In Lawrence v. Texas, the Court struck down a Texas statute outlawing sexual activity between same-sex individuals. Each case raised challenges under both the Equal Protection Clause and the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
Euthanasia In America - Past, Present, And Future: A Review Of A Merciful End And Forced Exit, Edward J. Larson
Euthanasia In America - Past, Present, And Future: A Review Of A Merciful End And Forced Exit, Edward J. Larson
Michigan Law Review
Nearly 170 years ago, in the classic first volume of his Democracy in America, Alexis de Tocqueville observed, "Scarcely any political question arises in the United States that is not resolved, sooner or later, into a judicial question." De Tocqueville viewed this as a peculiarly U.S. development. He attributed it to the authority of the judiciary in the United States to review governmental enactments and establish individual rights based on judicial interpretation of the federal and state constitution. "Whenever a law that the judge holds to be unconstitutional is invoked in a tribunal of the United States, he may …
Brown And Tee-Hit-Ton, Earl M. Maltz
Five Critical Issues In New York’S Grandparent Visitation Law After Troxel V. Granville, Stephen A. Newman
Five Critical Issues In New York’S Grandparent Visitation Law After Troxel V. Granville, Stephen A. Newman
NYLS Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Journey From Brown V. Board Of Education To Grutter V. Bollinger: From Racial Assimilation To Diversity, Harry T. Edwards
The Journey From Brown V. Board Of Education To Grutter V. Bollinger: From Racial Assimilation To Diversity, Harry T. Edwards
Michigan Law Review
Fifty years ago, in Brown v. Board of Education, the Supreme Court confronted a precise and straightforward question: "Does segregation of children in public schools solely on the basis of race, even though the physical facilities and other 'tangible' factors may be equal, deprive the children of the minority group of equal educational opportunities?" The Court's answer was precise and straightforward: "We conclude that in the field of public education the doctrine of "separate but equal" has no place. Separate educational facilities are inherently unequal. Therefore, we hold that the plaintiffs ... are, by reason of the segregation complained of, …