Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Supreme Court of the United States Commons™
Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- United States Supreme Court (3)
- Abe Fortas (1)
- Adams v. Egley (1)
- Article 9 (1)
- Authority (1)
-
- Banks (1)
- Book Reviews (1)
- Congress (1)
- Costs (1)
- Credit (1)
- Creditors (1)
- Debtors (1)
- Default (1)
- Due process (1)
- Federal Rules of Evidence (1)
- Fuentes v. Shevin (1)
- Goods (1)
- James W. Payne Jr. (1)
- Judiciary (1)
- Personal property (1)
- Property (1)
- Replevin (1)
- Repossession (1)
- Robert Shogan (1)
- Rules Enabling Act of 1934 (1)
- Secured credit (1)
- Security interests (1)
- State action doctrine (1)
- UCC (1)
- Uniform Commercial Code (1)
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 5 of 5
Full-Text Articles in Supreme Court of the United States
The Uniqueness Of The Warren And Burger Courts In American Constitutional History, P. Allan Dionisopoulos
The Uniqueness Of The Warren And Burger Courts In American Constitutional History, P. Allan Dionisopoulos
Buffalo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Book Review Of A Question Of Judgment: The Fortas Case And The Struggle For The Supreme Court, Richard A. Williamson
Book Review Of A Question Of Judgment: The Fortas Case And The Struggle For The Supreme Court, Richard A. Williamson
William & Mary Law Review
No abstract provided.
Congressional Discretion In Dealing With The Federal Rules Of Evidence, Stuart M. Lockman
Congressional Discretion In Dealing With The Federal Rules Of Evidence, Stuart M. Lockman
University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform
On November 20, 1972, the Supreme Court, pursuant to statutory authority, adopted the Federal Rules of Evidence. The new rules of evidence were not to take effect, however, until ninety days after they had been submitted to Congress. The rules were officially submitted on February 5, 1973, but even before that date they had become the subject of extensive legislative debate. While some attorneys praise the codification of evidence rules as a progressive step, others maintain that certain of these promulgations will have an objectionable impact on the federal judicial system or that the Supreme Court has exceeded its authority …
Jim Payne - The Man, Julian E. Savage
Jim Payne - The Man, Julian E. Savage
University of Richmond Law Review
Others will remember him as a teacher; as a colleague; as a scholar. I remember the man-a very human man-an exceptionally sensitive man. Some, who had contact with him only during the last year or two of his life, should know that illness and fatigue were then his' daily companions, forcing concessions of his time and brilliance, and making it impossible for him to give as fully of himself to his students as he had done for so many years past.
The Abolition Of Self-Help Repossession: The Poor Pay Even More, James J. White
The Abolition Of Self-Help Repossession: The Poor Pay Even More, James J. White
Articles
In this paper I propose to identify possible ways in which a court could uphold the constitutionality of section 9-503 without an explicit rejection of Fuentes v. Shevin. It is my thesis that Fuentes v. Shevin is probably an undesirable outcome, and that the application of the same doctrine to self-help repossession is certainly undesirable and would constitute due process gone berserk. My arguments will not be novel; each has been suggested by the courts that have considered this matter, or by the briefs of the lawyers who have argued these cases. I cannot even claim to have collected the …