Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Supreme Court of the United States Commons™
Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Supreme Court (7)
- Brown v. Board of Education (2)
- Congress (2)
- Constitution (2)
- Constitutional law (2)
-
- Constitutional rights (2)
- Fourteenth amendment (2)
- 1995 bombing (1)
- 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1)
- A Critical (1)
- ACLU (1)
- Abolish Affordable Care Act (1)
- Abortion (1)
- Accusation (1)
- Adam Smith (1)
- Adult children (1)
- Adversary system (1)
- Age (1)
- Age of majority (1)
- Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building (1)
- All-Black towns (1)
- American Bar Association’s Standing Committee on the Judiciary (1)
- American Jurisprudence (1)
- American civil liberties union (1)
- Amy Coney Barrett (1)
- Aquinas (1)
- Asylum petition (1)
- BIA (1)
- Barrett (1)
- Bill Clinton (1)
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 9 of 9
Full-Text Articles in Supreme Court of the United States
Locking The Golden Door And Throwing Away The Key: An Analysis Of Asylum During The Years Of The Trump Administration, Samantha B. Karpman
Locking The Golden Door And Throwing Away The Key: An Analysis Of Asylum During The Years Of The Trump Administration, Samantha B. Karpman
Touro Law Review
The years of the Trump Administration have certainly been some of the most divisive in modern American political history. One of the largest divides arose from former President Trump’s brazen, “zero tolerance” immigration policies that relentlessly attacked many forms of immigration coming into the United States. Asylum-based immigration, which allows immigrants to come to this country as a safe haven when they are fleeing persecution in their home countries, was one of former President Trump’s main targets. Former President Trump even came dangerously close to eliminating asylum-based immigration with his “Death to Asylum” policy in December of 2020. President Biden …
Charles Reich, New Dealer, John Q. Barrett
Restoring Trust In The Judiciary: A Critical, High Priority Project For The Biden Administration, Richard C. Cahn
Restoring Trust In The Judiciary: A Critical, High Priority Project For The Biden Administration, Richard C. Cahn
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Of Arms And The Militia: Gun Regulation By Defining “Ordinary Military Equipment”, Edward J. Curtis
Of Arms And The Militia: Gun Regulation By Defining “Ordinary Military Equipment”, Edward J. Curtis
Touro Law Review
Recent mass shootings have placed pressure on Congress and state legislatures to regulate semi-automatic rifles and handguns in the interest of public safety. However, the Second Amendment provides that, “[a] well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed. There is no obvious public safety exception.
Semi-automatic rifles, handguns, and other kinds of arms can be regulated more effectively by defining the “ordinary military equipment” militia members are expected to provide. This may be accomplished using the rationale employed by the United States …
Witness For The Self: Miranda V. Arizona’S Political Theology, Graham James Mcaleer
Witness For The Self: Miranda V. Arizona’S Political Theology, Graham James Mcaleer
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Wise Legal Giant, Thomas A. Schweitzer
Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Wise Legal Giant, Thomas A. Schweitzer
Scholarly Works
No abstract provided.
Nine Ways Of Looking At Oklahoma City: An Essay On Sam Anderson’S Boom Town, Rodger D. Citron
Nine Ways Of Looking At Oklahoma City: An Essay On Sam Anderson’S Boom Town, Rodger D. Citron
Scholarly Works
No abstract provided.
Debunking “De Minimis” Violations Of Prisoners’ Religious Rights: Further Problems With The Supreme Court’S “Hands Off” Approach, Samantha Sparacino
Debunking “De Minimis” Violations Of Prisoners’ Religious Rights: Further Problems With The Supreme Court’S “Hands Off” Approach, Samantha Sparacino
Touro Law Review
Circuits are split as there continues to be an inconsistent application of Supreme Court doctrine stemming from the notion of the separation of church and the state. Imprisonment does not strip a wrongdoer of his constitutionally guaranteed rights and protections. Some Circuits have held that a minor, or de minimis, interpretation of an inmate’s religious rights can constitute a substantial burden under the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act. In the absence of clear direction from the Supreme Court, I propose that courts should refrain from determining the value of a religious belief or practice as it relates …
Does Due Process Have An Age Limit? Why The Law Concerning The Parental Right To Freedom Of Intimate Association In The Relationship With An Adult Child Is A Mischaracterization Of A Circuit Split, Bryan Schenkman
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.