Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Administrative state (1)
- CBA (1)
- Cooperative federalism (1)
- Cost-benefit analysis (1)
- Equity (1)
-
- Fairness (1)
- Law and economics (1)
- Legal history (1)
- New Deal (1)
- Poverty law (1)
- Prioritarianism (1)
- Public benefits (1)
- Rights language (1)
- Risk policy (1)
- SWF (1)
- Social Security Act (1)
- Social choice theory (1)
- Social welfare functions (1)
- U.S. history (1)
- Uncertainty (1)
- Utilitarianism (1)
- VSL (1)
- Value of statistical life (1)
- Welfare (1)
- Welfare economics (1)
- Welfare rights (1)
- Welfarism (1)
- Wellbeing (1)
Articles 1 - 2 of 2
Full-Text Articles in Social Welfare Law
The Social Value Of Mortality Risk Reduction: Vsl Vs. The Social Welfare Function Approach, Matthew D. Adler, James K. Hammitt, Nicholas Treich
The Social Value Of Mortality Risk Reduction: Vsl Vs. The Social Welfare Function Approach, Matthew D. Adler, James K. Hammitt, Nicholas Treich
All Faculty Scholarship
We examine how different welfarist frameworks evaluate the social value of mortality risk-reduction. These frameworks include classical, distributively unweighted cost-benefit analysis—i.e., the “value per statistical life” (VSL) approach—and three benchmark social welfare functions (SWF): a utilitarian SWF, an ex ante prioritarian SWF, and an ex post prioritarian SWF. We examine the conditions on individual utility and on the SWF under which these frameworks display the following five properties: i) wealth sensitivity, ii) sensitivity to baseline risk, iii) equal value of risk reduction, iv) preference for risk equity, and v) catastrophe aversion. We show that the particular manner in which VSL …
Welfare And Rights Before The Movement: Rights As A Language Of The State, Karen M. Tani
Welfare And Rights Before The Movement: Rights As A Language Of The State, Karen M. Tani
All Faculty Scholarship
In conversations about government assistance, rights language often emerges as a danger: when benefits become “rights,” policymakers lose flexibility, taxpayers suffer, and the poor lose their incentive to work. Absent from the discussion is an understanding of how, when, and why Americans began to talk about public benefits in rights terms. This Article addresses that lacuna by examining the rise of a vibrant language of rights within the federal social welfare bureaucracy during the 1930s and 1940s. This language is barely visible in judicial and legislative records, the traditional source base for legal-historical inquiry, but amply evidenced by previously unmined …