Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Bowers v. Hardwick (1)
- Criminalize (1)
- Disability (1)
- Due process (1)
- Griswold v. Connecticut (1)
-
- Homosexual sodomy (1)
- Infringement (1)
- Judeo-Christian ethics (1)
- Lawrence v. Texas (1)
- Martin Schwartz (1)
- Medicaid (1)
- Medical benefits (1)
- Personal autonomy (1)
- Privacy (1)
- Right to marry (1)
- Schwartz (1)
- Section 1983 litigation (1)
- Sexual privacy (1)
- Skinner v. Oklahoma (1)
- Sodomy (1)
- Statutory interpretation (1)
- Supplemental Needs Trusts (1)
- Publication
Articles 1 - 2 of 2
Full-Text Articles in Social Welfare Law
Lawrence V. Texas: The Decision And Its Implications For The Future, Martin A. Schwartz
Lawrence V. Texas: The Decision And Its Implications For The Future, Martin A. Schwartz
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Missing The Forest For The Trees: Why Supplemental Needs Trusts Should Be Exempt From Medicaid Determinations, Jeffrey R. Grimyser
Missing The Forest For The Trees: Why Supplemental Needs Trusts Should Be Exempt From Medicaid Determinations, Jeffrey R. Grimyser
Chicago-Kent Law Review
Supplemental needs trusts are trusts designed to assist individuals with disabilities by paying for services and items that Medicaid will not pay for. Federal law, however, is unclear as to whether using one of these trusts automatically disqualifies someone from receiving Medicaid, thereby causing the circuit courts to split on their interpretation. Some circuits have held that the Medicaid statute allows states to enact laws prohibiting the use of these trusts while receiving Medicaid benefits based on the federal law’s statutory language. While other circuits have ruled that individuals can simultaneously receive Medicaid benefits and use supplemental needs trusts given …