Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Antitrust (1)
- Atomic energy (1)
- Counterfeiting (1)
- Courts (1)
- Crimes (1)
-
- Criminal law (1)
- Extraterritorial crime (1)
- Filed rate doctrine (1)
- German Criminal Code (1)
- International criminal law (1)
- International law (1)
- Investor-owned (1)
- Jurisdiction (1)
- Meaningful connections (1)
- Political action doctrine (1)
- Price squeeze (1)
- Principle of ubiquity (1)
- Public utility rate structures (1)
- Regulated (1)
- Sales (1)
- State action doctrine (1)
- Territoriality theory (1)
- Utilities (1)
- Vicarious administration of justice (1)
Articles 1 - 2 of 2
Full-Text Articles in Other Law
International Law Principles Governing The Extraterritorial Application Of Criminal Law, Christopher L. Blakesley
International Law Principles Governing The Extraterritorial Application Of Criminal Law, Christopher L. Blakesley
Scholarly Works
In this piece Professor Blakesley provides remarks on the differences and similarities between Germany and the United States on international principles of jurisdiction over extraterritorial crime.
Immunity From Regulatory Price Squeeze Claims: From Keogh, Parker, And Noerr To Town Of Concord And Beyond, Keith A. Rowley
Immunity From Regulatory Price Squeeze Claims: From Keogh, Parker, And Noerr To Town Of Concord And Beyond, Keith A. Rowley
Scholarly Works
On September 21, 1990, the First Circuit handed down its decision in Town of Concord, Massachusetts v. Boston Edison Co. This case, the most recent in a growing line of court of appeals decisions examining the antitrust implications of public utility rate structures, represents the first time a United States court of appeals has unequivocally stated that an antitrust action based upon a “price squeeze” could not be maintained against a utility whose wholesale and retail rates were both fully regulated. Town of Concord notwithstanding, the courts are far from agreeing whether investor-owned electric or natural gas utilities are immune …