Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
Articles 1 - 5 of 5
Full-Text Articles in Other Law
Salt Equalizer, Vol. 1989, Issue 4, Society Of American Law Teachers
Salt Equalizer, Vol. 1989, Issue 4, Society Of American Law Teachers
SALT Equalizer
Contents of this issue:
Rhonda Rivera to Receive 1990 SALT Award, at 1.
Robert Cover Memorial Activities, at 2.
Robert Cover, Yale Law School Proposal for a Post-Graduate Internship Program, at 3.
SALT Archives and Historian, at 5.
SALT Board Meets, at 6.
SALT Clearinghouse, at 6.
SALT Editor, at 6.
Salt Equalizer, Vol. 1989, Issue 3, Society Of American Law Teachers
Salt Equalizer, Vol. 1989, Issue 3, Society Of American Law Teachers
SALT Equalizer
Contents of this issue:
SALT Recommends Amendments to AALS Proposed Bylaw 6-2 and Its Commentary, at 1
SALT Board Meets, at 3.
SALT Clearinghouse, at 3.
Admitting Opinions And Conclusions In Evaluative Reports: The Trustworthiness Inquiry—Beech Aircraft Corp. V. Rainey, 109 S. Ct. 439 (1988), Cheryl Musselman-Brown
Admitting Opinions And Conclusions In Evaluative Reports: The Trustworthiness Inquiry—Beech Aircraft Corp. V. Rainey, 109 S. Ct. 439 (1988), Cheryl Musselman-Brown
Washington Law Review
In Beech Aircraft Corp. v. Rainey, the United States Supreme Court held that opinions and conclusions in evaluative reports are within the scope of the federal public records hearsay exception if trustworthy. Washington's public records hearsay exception excludes opinions and conclusions in evaluative reports. This Note analyzes the trustworthiness requirement under the federal rule and proposes that Washington adopt the federal rule.
Salt Equalizer, Vol. 1989, Issue 1, Society Of American Law Teachers
Salt Equalizer, Vol. 1989, Issue 1, Society Of American Law Teachers
SALT Equalizer
Contents of this issue:
Howard Glickstein, 1987-88 SALT Salary Survey, at 1.
SALT Activities at 1989 AALS Conference, at 5.
Salt Elections, at 5.
Advisory Opinions: Cautions About Non-Judicial Undertakings, Robert H. Kennedy
Advisory Opinions: Cautions About Non-Judicial Undertakings, Robert H. Kennedy
University of Richmond Law Review
Justices of several states, unlike members of the federal judiciary, render advisory opinions to governors and legislatures. In those states, the justices have the authority to issue requested opinions in the absence of pending litigation. Although the practice earlier had more widespread use, it has never been employed by all states. Unless carefully circumscribed, the advisory process has considerable unexamined significance.