Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
- Keyword
-
- Abused men (1)
- Anti-antiformalism (1)
- Brookfield Communications v. West Coast Etnertainment Corp. (1)
- Buckley v. American Constitutional Law Foundation (1)
- Classical law (1)
-
- Classical revival (1)
- Common law (1)
- Consumer search costs (1)
- Domestic violence (1)
- Electoral recall (1)
- First Amendment (1)
- Goodwill rationale (1)
- Gutierrez v. Ada (1)
- Inc. (1)
- Initial interest confusion (1)
- Initiative (1)
- Lanham Act (1)
- Newoclassical law (1)
- Recall (1)
- Recall measures (1)
- Recall mechanism (1)
- Recall petition (1)
- Referendum (1)
- Republican Party of Hawaii v. Mink (1)
- Search cost rationale (1)
- Signature requirements (1)
- Spousal abuse (1)
- Trademark infringement (1)
- Trademark law (1)
Articles 1 - 4 of 4
Full-Text Articles in Other Law
Access Denied: The Problem Of Abused Men In Washington, Melody M. Crick
Access Denied: The Problem Of Abused Men In Washington, Melody M. Crick
Seattle University Law Review
This Comment explains how the Washington legislature and court system have failed to provide abused men with much needed protection, despite a law that is facially gender neutral. Following this Introduction, Part II explores the wording of Washington's domestic violence statutes and analyzes the current implementing regulations. Part III demonstrates that the problem of abused men is legitimate by examining increasing social awareness and the results of current studies. By examining the prevailing national viewpoint embodied in the Violence Against Women Act, Part IV discusses how such a viewpoint adversely affects the availability of resources for abused men. Part V …
Electoral Recall In Washington State And California: California Needs Stricter Standards To Protect Elected Officials From Harassment, Joshua Osborne-Klein
Electoral Recall In Washington State And California: California Needs Stricter Standards To Protect Elected Officials From Harassment, Joshua Osborne-Klein
Seattle University Law Review
This article highlights the weaknesses of the electoral recall mechanisms in California and the way in which the Washington recall process has avoided such weaknesses. Part II provides general background information on the development of recall mechanisms. Part III explores how the United States Supreme Court has ruled on recall attempts and the specific guidance the Court has provided for states in developing adequately protective recall processes. Part IV analyzes the strengths and weaknesses of the California recall provisions by examining the recall-related opinions of California courts and the complexities of Governor Davis's recall. Part V provides a solution to …
The Road Not Taken: Initial Interest Confusion, Consumer Search Costs, And The Challenge Of The Internet, Michael Grynberg
The Road Not Taken: Initial Interest Confusion, Consumer Search Costs, And The Challenge Of The Internet, Michael Grynberg
Seattle University Law Review
This article critiques the development and application of initial interest confusion and argues for a doctrine based on consumer search costs rather than a trademark owner's goodwill. Part I traces the origin of initial interest confusion and presents a theory, based on minimizing search costs, of when the concept should be applied. It then examines the application of initial interest confusion in light of the courts' uncertainty as to the purpose of the doctrine. Part II describes the doctrinal difficulties caused by the uncritical adoption of initial interest confusion to cases involving the Internet. These problems can be resolved by …
Un-Making Law: The Classical Revival In The Common Law, Jay Feinman
Un-Making Law: The Classical Revival In The Common Law, Jay Feinman
Seattle University Law Review
This article describes the possibility of a classical revival in the common law and situates the revival in its historical context. Part I sets the stage by briefly summarizing a century and a half of common-law development. At the end of the Nineteenth Century, classical legal thought envisioned a highly systematic body of law through which courts could mechanically apply abstract legal concepts to reach determinate results, producing limited liability in contract and tort law and expansive property rights. Critics beginning with Holmes and notably including Progressives and legal realists attacked classical law as incomplete and incoherent. Their critique was …