Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- Birth control (1)
- Birth control sabotage (1)
- Claim (1)
- Compensation (1)
- Discrimination (1)
-
- District Courts (1)
- Domestic abuse (1)
- EEOC (1)
- Employment discrimination (1)
- Equal employment opportunity commission (1)
- Federal Courts (1)
- Filing period (1)
- Gender discrimination (1)
- Intimate partner violence (1)
- Judiciary (1)
- Ledbetter (1)
- Ledbetter v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber (1)
- Lilly Ledbetter (1)
- Pay discrimination (1)
- Pay disparity (1)
- Political Science (1)
- Robert L. Taylor (1)
- Salary (1)
- Sex discrimination (1)
- Stealthing (1)
- Title 7 (1)
- Title VII (1)
- United States (1)
- United States v. Evans (1)
- Unlawful employment practice (1)
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 6 of 6
Full-Text Articles in Other Law
Punitive Injunctions, Nirej S. Sekhon
Gender In Asbestos Law: Cui Bono: Cui Pacat, Anita Bernstein
Gender In Asbestos Law: Cui Bono: Cui Pacat, Anita Bernstein
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Ledbetter V. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., Derrick A. Bell Jr.
Ledbetter V. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., Derrick A. Bell Jr.
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Judicial Influence And The United States Federal District Courts: A Case Study, Justin R. Hickerson
Judicial Influence And The United States Federal District Courts: A Case Study, Justin R. Hickerson
Chancellor’s Honors Program Projects
No abstract provided.
The End Of Religious Freedom: What Is At Stake?, Nelson Tebbe
The End Of Religious Freedom: What Is At Stake?, Nelson Tebbe
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Contraceptive Sabotage, Leah A. Plunkett
Contraceptive Sabotage, Leah A. Plunkett
Law Faculty Scholarship
This Article responds to the alarm recently sounded by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists over “birth control sabotage”—the “active interference [by one partner] with [the other] partner’s contraceptive methods in an attempt to promote pregnancy.” Currently, sabotage is not a crime, and existing categories of criminal offenses fail to capture the essence of the injury it does to victims. This Article argues that sabotage should be a separate crime—but only when perpetrated against those partners who can and do get pregnant as a result of having sabotaged sex. Using the principle of self-possession—understood as a person’s basic right …