Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Access to justice (1)
- Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act (1)
- Appellate (1)
- Astrue v. Ratliff (1)
- Attorney’s fees (1)
-
- Bad lawyering (1)
- California (1)
- Cases Jerman v. Carlisle (1)
- Civil liability (1)
- Court of appeal (1)
- Court of appeals (1)
- Courts (1)
- Courts of appeal (1)
- Eileen Kaufman (1)
- FDCPA (1)
- Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (1)
- First Amendment (1)
- Gallop & Milavetz (1)
- Hardt v. Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company (1)
- Holder (1)
- Humanitarian Law Project (1)
- Kaufman (1)
- Kramer & Ulrich LPA (1)
- Lawyering (1)
- Lewis v. City of Chicago (1)
- McNellie (1)
- Milavetz (1)
- Mohawk v. Carpenter (1)
- P.A. v. United States (1)
- Pro bono (1)
- Publication
Articles 1 - 2 of 2
Full-Text Articles in Other Law
Lawyering Decisions—October 2009 Term, Eileen Kaufman
Lawyering Decisions—October 2009 Term, Eileen Kaufman
Eileen Kaufman
No abstract provided.
A New Public Interest Appellate Model: Public Counsel’S Court-Based Self-Help Clinic And Pro Bono “Triage” For Indigent Pro Se Civil Litigants On Appeal, Meehan Rasch
Meehan Rasch
A variety of new “pro se” or “pro bono” appellate programs have been sprouting up around the country in recent years. Courts, bar associations, and legal services and advocacy organizations are implementing these projects to grapple with the challenges raised by increasing numbers of pro se (self-represented) and indigent civil litigants in appellate courts. Judicial operational systems designed on the premise of adequately counseled parties are ill-prepared to handle an influx of self-represented litigants, posing frustrations for both pro se litigants and court personnel. The expansion of pro se litigation strains appellate court resources and staff, but because of the …