Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Adult Criminal Court (1)
- County (1)
- Department of health (1)
- Department of health and human services (1)
- Deterrence (1)
-
- Drug abuse (1)
- Due Process (1)
- Federal parity (1)
- Federal parity legislation (1)
- Federalism (1)
- Fifth Amendment (1)
- Fourteenth Amendment (1)
- HHS (1)
- Health insurance (1)
- Healthcare (1)
- In re Gault (1)
- Indigency (1)
- Insurers (1)
- JJDPA (1)
- Juvenile Code (1)
- Juvenile Court (1)
- Juvenile Delinquency (1)
- Juvenile Judge (1)
- Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act (1)
- Juvenile Proceeding (1)
- Kent v. United States (1)
- Medicaid (1)
- Mental health (1)
- Parens Patriae (1)
- Parity (1)
Articles 1 - 2 of 2
Full-Text Articles in Other Law
Mhpaea & Marble Cake: Parity & The Forgotten Frame Of Federalism, Taleed El-Sabawi
Mhpaea & Marble Cake: Parity & The Forgotten Frame Of Federalism, Taleed El-Sabawi
Dickinson Law Review (2017-Present)
No abstract provided.
When Big Brother Becomes “Big Father”: Examining The Continued Use Of Parens Patriae In State Juvenile Delinquency Proceedings, Emily R. Mowry
When Big Brother Becomes “Big Father”: Examining The Continued Use Of Parens Patriae In State Juvenile Delinquency Proceedings, Emily R. Mowry
Dickinson Law Review (2017-Present)
The U.S. Constitution grants American citizens numerous Due Process rights; but, historically, the Supreme Court declined to extend these Due Process rights to children. Initially, common-law courts treated child offenders over the age of seven in the same manner as adult criminals. At the start of the 20th century, though, juvenile reformers assisted in creating unique juvenile courts that used the parens patriae doctrine and viewed children as delinquent youths in need of judicial parental guidance rather than punishment. Later, starting in 1967, the Supreme Court released multiple opinions extending certain constitutional Due Process rights to children in juvenile delinquency …