Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- EPA (2)
- 1998 RCRA Decree (1)
- 2009 CERCLA Decree (1)
- 866 F.3d 1108 (1)
- 9th Circuit (1)
-
- AEA (1)
- APA (1)
- Acres (1)
- Administrative Procedures Act (1)
- American Smelting and Refining Company (1)
- Amoco Production Company (1)
- Anaconda (1)
- Anaconda Copper Mining Company (1)
- Anaconda Mining Company (1)
- Appeal (1)
- Arco (1)
- Asarco (1)
- Asarco LLC v. Atlantic Richfield Co. (1)
- Asarco LLC v. Atlantic Richfield Company (1)
- Atlantic Richfield (1)
- Atlantic Richfield Co. (1)
- Atlantic Richfield Company (1)
- Atomic Energy Act (1)
- BLM (1)
- Beneficial interest (1)
- Bureau of Land Management (1)
- CERCLA (1)
- Circuit Split (1)
- Cleanup Costs (1)
- Colorado (1)
Articles 1 - 4 of 4
Full-Text Articles in Oil, Gas, and Mineral Law
Virginia Uranium, Inc. V. Warren, Nyles G. Greer
Virginia Uranium, Inc. V. Warren, Nyles G. Greer
Public Land & Resources Law Review
The Supreme Court of the United States recently ruled that the Atomic Energy Act did not preempt a Virginia law prohibiting uranium mining in the Commonwealth. The Court held that although the Act delegated substantial power over the nuclear life cycle to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, it offered no indication that Congress sought to strip states of their traditional power to regulate mining on private lands within their borders.
Maralex Resources, Inc. V. Barnhardt, Bradley E. Tinker
Maralex Resources, Inc. V. Barnhardt, Bradley E. Tinker
Public Land & Resources Law Review
In Maralex Resources v. Barnhardt, Maralex and property owners brought an action to protect private property from BLM inspections of oil and gas lease sites. The Tenth Circuit looked at the plain meaning of a congressional statute and held in favor of Maralex, finding that BLM lacked authority to require a private landowner to provide BLM with a key to inspect wells of their property. The Tenth Circuit held BLM has the authority to conduct inspections without prior notice on private property lease sites; however, it is required to contact the property owner for permission before entering the property.
Asarco Llc V. Atlantic Richfield Company, Ryan L. Hickey
Asarco Llc V. Atlantic Richfield Company, Ryan L. Hickey
Public Land & Resources Law Review
The Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liabiltiy Act, commonly known as CERCLA, facilitates cleanup of hazardous waste sites and those contaminated by other harmful substances by empowering the Environmental Protection Agency to identify responsible parties and require them to undertake or fund remediation. Because pollution sometimes occurrs over long periods of time by multiple parties, CERCLA also enables polluters to seek financial contribution from other contaminators of a particular site. The Ninth Circuit clarified the particuar circumstances under which contribution actions may arise in Asarco LLC v. Atlantic Richfield Co., holding non-CERCLA settlements may give rise to CERCLA contribution …
United States V. Osage Wind, Llc, Summer Carmack
United States V. Osage Wind, Llc, Summer Carmack
Public Land & Resources Law Review
The Osage Nation, as owner of the beneficial interest in its mineral estate, issues federally-approved leases to persons and entities who wish to conduct mineral development on its lands. After an energy-development company, Osage Wind, leased privately-owned surface lands within Tribal reservation boundaries and began to excavate minerals for purposes of constructing a wind farm, the United States brought suit on the Tribe’s behalf. In the ensuing litigation, the Osage Nation insisted that Osage Wind should have obtained a mineral lease from the Tribe before beginning its work. In its decision, the Tenth Circuit applied one of the Indian law …