Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- International Law (5)
- Military, War, and Peace (5)
- American Politics (3)
- Law and Politics (3)
- Political Science (3)
-
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (3)
- International Relations (2)
- Policy Design, Analysis, and Evaluation (2)
- Public Affairs, Public Policy and Public Administration (2)
- Climate (1)
- Constitutional Law (1)
- Defense and Security Studies (1)
- Diseases (1)
- Environmental Law (1)
- Environmental Policy (1)
- Environmental Sciences (1)
- Health Law and Policy (1)
- Health Policy (1)
- Immigration Law (1)
- International Public Health (1)
- Law and Society (1)
- Legal History (1)
- Legal Studies (1)
- Legal Theory (1)
- Medicine and Health Sciences (1)
- Oceanography and Atmospheric Sciences and Meteorology (1)
- Other Environmental Sciences (1)
- Keyword
-
- Advice & consent resolutions (1)
- Anxiety (1)
- Border control (1)
- Border orientation (1)
- COVID-19 pandemic (1)
-
- Climate change (1)
- Climate-security nexus (1)
- Emergency (1)
- Empirical investigation of control measures (1)
- Environmental law (1)
- Executive authority (1)
- External border restrictions (1)
- Extreme weather (1)
- Filtering infrastructure (1)
- Foreign relations & constitutional law (1)
- Global health crisis (1)
- Historical quarantines (1)
- Military intelligence (1)
- National climate assessment (1)
- National security values & risks (1)
- Non-traditional security threat (1)
- Politics (1)
- Presidential power (1)
- Sea level rise (1)
- Separation & distribution of foreign affairs powers (1)
- Sovereignty (1)
- Territorial integrity (1)
- Travel bans (1)
- Treaty formation & withdrawal (1)
- Treaty rejoining (1)
Articles 1 - 7 of 7
Full-Text Articles in National Security Law
On Environmental, Climate Change & National Security Law, Mark P. Nevitt
On Environmental, Climate Change & National Security Law, Mark P. Nevitt
All Faculty Scholarship
This Article offers a new way to think about climate change. Two new climate change assessments — the 2018 Fourth National Climate Assessment (NCA) and the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel’s Special Report on Climate Change — prominently highlight climate change’s multifaceted national security risks. Indeed, not only is climate change a “super wicked” environmental problem, it also accelerates existing national security threats, acting as both a “threat accelerant” and “catalyst for conflict.” Further, climate change increases the intensity and frequency of extreme weather events while threatening nations’ territorial integrity and sovereignty through rising sea levels. It causes both internal displacement …
Contemporary Practice Of The United States Relating To International Law (114:4 Am J Int'l L), Jean Galbraith
Contemporary Practice Of The United States Relating To International Law (114:4 Am J Int'l L), Jean Galbraith
All Faculty Scholarship
This article is reproduced with permission from the October 2020 issue of the American Journal of International Law © 2020 American Society of International Law. All rights reserved.
Pandemic Response As Border Politics, Michael R. Kenwick, Beth A. Simmons
Pandemic Response As Border Politics, Michael R. Kenwick, Beth A. Simmons
All Faculty Scholarship
Pandemics are imbued with the politics of bordering. For centuries, border closures and restrictions on foreign travelers have been the most persistent and pervasive means by which states have responded to global health crises. The ubiquity of these policies is not driven by any clear scientific consensus about their utility in the face of myriad pandemic threats. Instead, we show they are influenced by public opinion and preexisting commitments to invest in the symbols and structures of state efforts to control their borders, a concept we call border orientation. Prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, border orientation was already generally …
Contemporary Practice Of The United States Relating To International Law (114:3 Am J Int'l L), Jean Galbraith
Contemporary Practice Of The United States Relating To International Law (114:3 Am J Int'l L), Jean Galbraith
All Faculty Scholarship
This article is reproduced with permission from the July 2020 issue of the American Journal of International Law © 2020 American Society of International Law. All rights reserved.
Contemporary Practice Of The United States Relating To International Law (114:2 Am J Int'l L), Jean Galbraith
Contemporary Practice Of The United States Relating To International Law (114:2 Am J Int'l L), Jean Galbraith
All Faculty Scholarship
This article is reproduced with permission from the April 2020 issue of the American Journal of International Law © 2020 American Society of International Law. All rights reserved.
Contemporary Practice Of The United States Relating To International Law (114:1 Am J Int'l L), Jean Galbraith
Contemporary Practice Of The United States Relating To International Law (114:1 Am J Int'l L), Jean Galbraith
All Faculty Scholarship
This article is reproduced with permission from the January 2020 issue of the American Journal of International Law © 2020 American Society of International Law. All rights reserved.
Rejoining Treaties, Jean Galbraith
Rejoining Treaties, Jean Galbraith
All Faculty Scholarship
Historical practice supports the conclusion that the President can unilaterally withdraw the United States from treaties which an earlier President joined with the advice and consent of two-thirds of the Senate, at least as long as this withdrawal is consistent with international law. This Article considers a further question that to date is deeply underexplored. This is: does the original Senate resolution of advice and consent to a treaty remain effective even after a President has withdrawn the United States from a treaty? I argue that the answer to this question is yes, except in certain limited circumstances. This answer …