Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Juvenile Law Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Articles 1 - 12 of 12

Full-Text Articles in Juvenile Law

Certification Of Juveniles To Adult Court , Joseph N. Sorrentino, Gary K. Olsen May 2013

Certification Of Juveniles To Adult Court , Joseph N. Sorrentino, Gary K. Olsen

Pepperdine Law Review

No abstract provided.


Guidelines For Statutes For Transfer Of Juveniles To Criminal Court , Elizabeth W. Browne May 2013

Guidelines For Statutes For Transfer Of Juveniles To Criminal Court , Elizabeth W. Browne

Pepperdine Law Review

No abstract provided.


Juvenile Justice In Transition , Julian C. Dixon May 2013

Juvenile Justice In Transition , Julian C. Dixon

Pepperdine Law Review

No abstract provided.


First Annual Juvenile Law Thematic Journal Pepperdine Law Review: Introduction, John L. Roche May 2013

First Annual Juvenile Law Thematic Journal Pepperdine Law Review: Introduction, John L. Roche

Pepperdine Law Review

No abstract provided.


Legislative Response To In Re Ronald S.: Cal. A.B. 958, Richard E. Boehm May 2013

Legislative Response To In Re Ronald S.: Cal. A.B. 958, Richard E. Boehm

Pepperdine Law Review

No abstract provided.


Graham V. Florida: How The Supreme Court's Rationale Encourages Reform Of The Juvenile Justice System Through Alternative Dispute Resolution Strategies, Heather Hojnacki Feb 2013

Graham V. Florida: How The Supreme Court's Rationale Encourages Reform Of The Juvenile Justice System Through Alternative Dispute Resolution Strategies, Heather Hojnacki

Pepperdine Dispute Resolution Law Journal

The article presents information on the reforms in the juvenile justice system of the U.S. through alternative dispute resolution-based strategies which has been illustrated with the U.S. Supreme Court cases Roper v. Simmons, and Graham v. Florida. It discusses rationale of the U.S. Supreme Court in Graham case and analyzes Graham's current and future impact. A proportionality standard expressed in legislative enactments and state practice was applied by the U.S. Supreme Court in Graham case.


Holding Juveniles Accountable: Reforming America's "Juvenile Injustice System", Ralph A. Rossum Nov 2012

Holding Juveniles Accountable: Reforming America's "Juvenile Injustice System", Ralph A. Rossum

Pepperdine Law Review

No abstract provided.


Framing The Juvenile Justice Problem: The Reality Behind The Problem, Robert M. Figlio, Lois Haight, Malcolm W. Klein, Sharon Kalemkiarian Oct 2012

Framing The Juvenile Justice Problem: The Reality Behind The Problem, Robert M. Figlio, Lois Haight, Malcolm W. Klein, Sharon Kalemkiarian

Pepperdine Law Review

No abstract provided.


Dealing With The Problem: Discretion Within The Court System, David Disco, Lisa Greer, Socrates Manoukian Oct 2012

Dealing With The Problem: Discretion Within The Court System, David Disco, Lisa Greer, Socrates Manoukian

Pepperdine Law Review

No abstract provided.


Reforming Juvenile Justice And Improving Juvenile Character: The Case For The Justice Model, Ralph A. Rossum Oct 2012

Reforming Juvenile Justice And Improving Juvenile Character: The Case For The Justice Model, Ralph A. Rossum

Pepperdine Law Review

No abstract provided.


Luncheon Speaker, Edwin Meese Iii Oct 2012

Luncheon Speaker, Edwin Meese Iii

Pepperdine Law Review

No abstract provided.


Cudgel Or Carrot: How Roper V. Simmons Will Affect Plea Bargaining In The Juvenile System , D. Brian Woo Mar 2012

Cudgel Or Carrot: How Roper V. Simmons Will Affect Plea Bargaining In The Juvenile System , D. Brian Woo

Pepperdine Dispute Resolution Law Journal

In 2005, the United States Supreme Court held, in Roper v. Simmons, that the execution of convicted juveniles violated the Eighth Amendment's prohibition on cruel and unusual punishment. In addressing the issue, the Court determined that a national consensus had developed against the execution of juveniles. Ultimately, a majority of the court decided that a national public consensus had been reached against the execution of juveniles under 18 in age. With Roper, no longer can juveniles of any age be executed. This decision will undoubtedly affect the entire juvenile penal system, from how cases enter the system, to …