Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Child welfare (2)
- Parents (2)
- Adoption and Safe Families Act (1)
- Child abuse (1)
- Disclosure (1)
-
- Doctors (1)
- Empirical studies (1)
- Family courts (1)
- Foster care (1)
- Foster children (1)
- Juvenile courts (1)
- Life imprisonment (1)
- Michigan (1)
- Michigan Department of Corrections (1)
- Miller v. Alabama (1)
- Oversight (1)
- Parental rights (1)
- Patients (1)
- Prisoners (1)
- Prisons (1)
- Removal (1)
- Reporting (1)
- Sentencing (1)
- Stanley v. Illinois (1)
- Teenagers (1)
- Termination of parental rights (1)
- United States Supreme Court (1)
- Publication
Articles 1 - 4 of 4
Full-Text Articles in Juvenile Law
Child Welfare's Scarlet Letter: How A Prior Termination Of Parental Rights Can Permanently Brand A Parent As Unfit, Vivek S. Sankaran
Child Welfare's Scarlet Letter: How A Prior Termination Of Parental Rights Can Permanently Brand A Parent As Unfit, Vivek S. Sankaran
Articles
In many jurisdictions, once a parent has her rights terminated to one child, the State can use that decision to justify the termination of parental rights to another child. The State can do so regardless of whether the parent is fit to parent the second child. This article explores this practice, examines its origins, and discusses its constitutional inadequacies.
Juvenile Lifers And Juveniles In Michigan Prisons: A Population Of Special Concern, Kimberly A. Thomas
Juvenile Lifers And Juveniles In Michigan Prisons: A Population Of Special Concern, Kimberly A. Thomas
Articles
Prisoners serving life without parole for offenses they committed when they were juveniles have received much attention after the United States Supreme Court found in Miller v Alabama that mandatory life without parole for juveniles violated the Eighth Amendment and found that its Miller decision applied retroactively. Courts have begun the process of sentencing and resentencing these individuals, some of whom are still teens and some of whom have served 40 years or more in the Michigan Department of Corrections (MDOC). All told, not including new cases that come before the court, approximately 370 prisoners will receive individualized sentences under …
Timely Permanency Or Unnecessary Removal?: Tips For Advocates For Children Who Spend Less Than 30 Days In Foster Care, Christopher Church, Monique Mitchell, Vivek Sankaran
Timely Permanency Or Unnecessary Removal?: Tips For Advocates For Children Who Spend Less Than 30 Days In Foster Care, Christopher Church, Monique Mitchell, Vivek Sankaran
Articles
Removal and placement in foster care is child welfare’s most severe intervention, contemplated as “a last resort rather than the first.” Federal law, with an overarching goal of preventing unnecessary removals, bolsters this principle by requiring juvenile and family courts to carefully oversee the removal of children to foster care. Expansive research reminds the field that removal, while often necessary, is not a benign intervention. Physically, legally, and emotionally separating children from their parent(s) can traumatize children in lasting ways. Yet review of federal data concerning children in foster care reveal a troubling narrative: each year, tens of thousands of …
Reviewer's Note, Vincent J. Palusci, Frank E. Vandervort
Reviewer's Note, Vincent J. Palusci, Frank E. Vandervort
Reviews
Review of Child Abuse & the Law by Jennifer N Fishe and Frederick L. Moffat III.