Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- 8th Amendment (1)
- AEDPA (1)
- Administrative Law (1)
- Age (1)
- Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 (1)
-
- Berkermer (1)
- Berkermer v. McCarty (1)
- Butler v. Michigan (1)
- Censorship (1)
- Child (1)
- Children (1)
- Comparative Law (1)
- Constitutional Law (1)
- Conviction (1)
- Corporations (1)
- Cruel and Unusual Punishment (1)
- Cullen (1)
- Cullen v. Pinholster (1)
- Custodial (1)
- Custody (1)
- Data Protection (1)
- Data breach (1)
- Data protection (1)
- Effective Assistance of Counsel (1)
- Eighth Amendment (1)
- First Amendment Jurisprudence (1)
- Freedom of Speech (1)
- Graham v. Florida (1)
- Habeas Corpus (1)
- Human Rights Law (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Juvenile Law
After Privacy: The Rise Of Facebook, The Fall Of Wikileaks, And Singapore’S Personal Data Protection Act 2012, Simon Chesterman
After Privacy: The Rise Of Facebook, The Fall Of Wikileaks, And Singapore’S Personal Data Protection Act 2012, Simon Chesterman
Simon Chesterman
This article discusses the changing ways in which information is produced, stored, and shared — exemplified by the rise of social-networking sites like Facebook and controversies over the activities of WikiLeaks — and the implications for privacy and data protection. Legal protections of privacy have always been reactive, but the coherence of any legal regime has also been undermined by the lack of a strong theory of what privacy is. There is more promise in the narrower field of data protection. Singapore, which does not recognise a right to privacy, has positioned itself as an e-commerce hub but had no …
Of Burning Houses And Roasting Pigs: Why Butler V. Michigan Remains A Key Free Speech Victory More Than A Half-Century Later, Clay Calvert
Of Burning Houses And Roasting Pigs: Why Butler V. Michigan Remains A Key Free Speech Victory More Than A Half-Century Later, Clay Calvert
Federal Communications Law Journal
More than fifty years after the U.S. Supreme Court rendered its unanimous decision in Butler v. Michigan, the case remains a pivotal-if unheralded and perhaps underappreciated-victory for freedom of speech. This Article analyzes the Butler principle and demonstrates how courts repeatedly apply it across different media platforms and in a myriad of factually distinct contexts, ranging from prohibitions on the sale of sex toys to bans on beer bottles with offensive labels. The Article initially provides an in-depth look at Butler, drawing on literary scholarship, historical newspaper articles from the time of the case, and other sources. It then illustrates …
New Paths For The Court: Protections Afforded Juveniles Under Miranda; Effective Assistance Of Counsel; And Habeas Corpus Decisions Of The Supreme Court’S 2010/2011 Term, Richard Klein
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.