Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Mexico (2)
- 14th Amendment (1)
- ADA (1)
- Americans with Disabilities Act (1)
- Anchor babies (1)
-
- Anchor baby (1)
- Applicability of due process to juvenile proceedings (1)
- Associate Justice (1)
- Birth affidavit (1)
- Birth certificates (1)
- Birthright citizenship (1)
- Breastfeeding (1)
- COVID-19 (1)
- Carlos Cadena (1)
- Childcare (1)
- Children's rights (1)
- Citizen (1)
- Citizenship (1)
- Civil Rights Act of 1964 (1)
- Commonwealth v. Fisher (1)
- Constitutional rights (1)
- Criminal-civil dichotomy (1)
- Delinquency proceedings (1)
- Deportation (1)
- Development of juvenile proceedings (1)
- Documentation (1)
- Driver's license (1)
- Due Process Clause (1)
- Due process reforms for juvenile proceedings. (1)
- Duncan v. Louisiana (1)
Articles 1 - 4 of 4
Full-Text Articles in Juvenile Law
Maternity Rights: A Comparative View Of Mexico And The United States, Roberto Rosas
Maternity Rights: A Comparative View Of Mexico And The United States, Roberto Rosas
The Scholar: St. Mary's Law Review on Race and Social Justice
Women play a large role in the workplace and require additional protection during pregnancy, childbirth, and while raising children. This article compares how Mexico and the United States have approached the issue of maternity rights and benefits. First, Mexico provides eighty-four days of paid leave to mothers, while the United States provides unpaid leave for up to twelve weeks. Second, Mexico allows two thirty-minute breaks a day for breastfeeding, while the United States allows a reasonable amount of time per day to breastfeed. Third, Mexico provides childcare to most federal employees, while the United States provides daycares to a small …
Undocumented Citizens Of The United States: The Repercussions Of Denying Birth Certificates, Anna L. Lichtenberger
Undocumented Citizens Of The United States: The Repercussions Of Denying Birth Certificates, Anna L. Lichtenberger
St. Mary's Law Journal
Abstract forthcoming
Due Process And The Juvenile Offender., Carlos Cadena
Due Process And The Juvenile Offender., Carlos Cadena
St. Mary's Law Journal
For over sixty years, courts consistently found notions of due process inapplicable in juvenile proceedings. The goal of the juvenile court movement was to establish systems of education and protection of errant children, rather than deterrence and retribution. To accomplish these results, the juvenile court was shorn of all resemblance to criminal courts. Public hearings were to be avoided and the intervention of counsel was not required, since the juvenile judge represented both the child and the state. However, it became clear that children were receiving the protection of the state because they engaged in criminal conduct and with little …
To Insure Due Process And Equal Protection, Such Facts As Are Necessary To Adjudicate A Child Delinquent Must Be Proved Beyond A Reasonable Doubt Rather Than By A Preponderance Of The Evidence., G. P. Hardy Iii
St. Mary's Law Journal
Abstract Forthcoming.