Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- Law and Technology (2)
- Legal Writing (General) (2)
- Administrative (1)
- Administrative Law (1)
- CBM (1)
-
- Constitutional Law (1)
- Covered Business Method Review (1)
- Education Law (1)
- Electronic speech (1)
- Empirical (1)
- First Amendment (1)
- IPR (1)
- Intellectual Property Law (1)
- Inter Partes Review (1)
- Juveniles (1)
- Legal Analysis and Writing (1)
- Legal Profession (1)
- Legal Research and Bibliography (1)
- Material and substantial disruption (1)
- Off-campus (1)
- PGR (1)
- Patentability (1)
- Patents (1)
- Practice and Procedure (1)
- School discipline (1)
- Science and Technology (1)
- Tinker v. Des Moines (1)
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 7 of 7
Full-Text Articles in Internet Law
One Hundred Nos: An Empirical Analysis Of The First 100 Denials Of Institution For Inter Partes And Covered Business Method Patent Reviews, Jonathan R. K. Stroud, Jarrad Wood
One Hundred Nos: An Empirical Analysis Of The First 100 Denials Of Institution For Inter Partes And Covered Business Method Patent Reviews, Jonathan R. K. Stroud, Jarrad Wood
Jonathan R. K. Stroud
Tasked in 2011 with creating three powerful new patent review trial regimes, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office—through the efforts of their freshly empowered quasi-judicial body, the Patent Trial and Appeals Board—set to creating a fast-paced trial with minimal discovery and maximum efficiency. In the first two years of existence, the proceedings have proved potent, holding unpatentable many of the claims that reach decisions on the merits. Yet a small subsection of petitions never make it past the starting gate, resulting in wasted time and effort on the parts of petitioners—and likely sighs of relief from the rights-holders. Parties on …
Omnipresent Student Speech And The Schoolhouse Gate: Interpreting Tinker In The Digital Age, Watt L. Black Jr.
Omnipresent Student Speech And The Schoolhouse Gate: Interpreting Tinker In The Digital Age, Watt L. Black Jr.
Watt Lesley Black Jr.
This paper focuses primarily on federal circuit level decisions regarding public school district's ability to discipline students who engage in electronic speech while off-campus and not involved in school activities. Particular attention is paid to the question of whether and how appeals courts have been willing to apply the "material and substantial disruption" standard from the Supreme Court's 1969 Tinker v. Des Moines decision to speech occurring off-campus. The paper, which is targeted toward both legal scholars and school administrators, draws together the common threads from the various circuits and weaves them into a set of guidelines for school administrators …
The Thirty-Third Annual John Marshall Law School International Moot Court Competition In Information Technology And Privacy Law: Bench Memorandum, 31 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 237 (2014), Adam Florek, Anisha Mehta, Danielle Young, Michael Greene
The Thirty-Third Annual John Marshall Law School International Moot Court Competition In Information Technology And Privacy Law: Bench Memorandum, 31 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 237 (2014), Adam Florek, Anisha Mehta, Danielle Young, Michael Greene
UIC John Marshall Journal of Information Technology & Privacy Law
No abstract provided.
The Thirty-Third Annual John Marshall Law School International Moot Court Competition In Information Technology And Privacy Law: Brief For The Petitioner, 31 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 251 (2014), Amany Awad, Kelly O'Neill, Arlo Walsman
The Thirty-Third Annual John Marshall Law School International Moot Court Competition In Information Technology And Privacy Law: Brief For The Petitioner, 31 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 251 (2014), Amany Awad, Kelly O'Neill, Arlo Walsman
UIC John Marshall Journal of Information Technology & Privacy Law
No abstract provided.
The Thirty-Third Annual John Marshall Law School International Moot Court Competition In Information Technology And Privacy Law: Brief For The Respondent, 31 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 285 (2014), Sara Schroeder, Austin Hoffman, Becky Fey
The Thirty-Third Annual John Marshall Law School International Moot Court Competition In Information Technology And Privacy Law: Brief For The Respondent, 31 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 285 (2014), Sara Schroeder, Austin Hoffman, Becky Fey
UIC John Marshall Journal of Information Technology & Privacy Law
No abstract provided.
E-Mail Netiquette For Lawyers, Gerald Lebovits
E-Mail Netiquette For Lawyers, Gerald Lebovits
Hon. Gerald Lebovits
No abstract provided.
E-Mail Netiquette For Lawyers, Gerald Lebovits
E-Mail Netiquette For Lawyers, Gerald Lebovits
Hon. Gerald Lebovits
No abstract provided.