Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Dispute Resolution and Arbitration Commons™
Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Antitrust and Trade Regulation (1)
- Banking and Finance Law (1)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (1)
- Conflict of Laws (1)
- Contracts (1)
-
- Economics (1)
- Government Contracts (1)
- Health Law and Policy (1)
- Human Rights Law (1)
- International Trade Law (1)
- Judges (1)
- Jurisprudence (1)
- Labor and Employment Law (1)
- Law and Society (1)
- Legislation (1)
- Litigation (1)
- Public Law and Legal Theory (1)
- Social Welfare Law (1)
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (1)
- Workers' Compensation Law (1)
Articles 1 - 2 of 2
Full-Text Articles in Dispute Resolution and Arbitration
Good Faith In The Cisg: Interpretation Problems In Article 7, Benedict C. Sheehy
Good Faith In The Cisg: Interpretation Problems In Article 7, Benedict C. Sheehy
ExpressO
ABSTRACT: This article examines the dispute concerning the meaning of Good Faith in the CISG. Although there are good reasons for arguing a more limited interpretation or more limited application of Good Faith, there are also good reasons for a broader approach. Regardless of the correct interpretation, however, practitioners and academics need to have a sense of where the actual jurisprudence is going. This article reviews every published case on Article 7 since its inception and concludes that while there is little to suggest a strong pattern is developing, a guided pattern while incorrect doctrinally is preferable to the current …
Evaluating Work: Enforcing Occupational Safety And Health Standards In The United States, Canada And Sweden, Daniel B. Klaff
Evaluating Work: Enforcing Occupational Safety And Health Standards In The United States, Canada And Sweden, Daniel B. Klaff
ExpressO
The United States’ occupational safety and health enforcement system is breaking down. Klaff argues that much of this breakdown has to do with a fundamental lack of worker participation in the United States’ safety and health system. Klaff makes his case by comparing and contrasting the history and enforcement schemes of the United States, Canada, and Sweden. After arguing for economic rights as human rights, Klaff concludes by offering a set of recommendations for the United States’ occupational safety and health system based upon his value-centered analysis.