Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
- Keyword
-
- Veterans benefits (2)
- Amberman v. Shinseki (1)
- Criminal law (1)
- Cushman v. Shinseki (1)
- Defense (1)
-
- Diminished responsibility (1)
- Disability benefits (1)
- Disability law (1)
- Duty to assist (1)
- Fifth amendment due process (1)
- Henderson v. Shinseki (1)
- Holton v. Shinseki (1)
- Insanity (1)
- Mental disability (1)
- Military Order of the Purple Heart of the USA v. Secretary of Veterans Affairs (1)
- Military benefits (1)
- Moore v. Shinseki (1)
- Reizenstein v. Shinseki (1)
- Shinseki v. Sanders (1)
- Vazquez-Flores v. Shinseki (1)
- Veterans Affairs (1)
- Veterans claims (1)
- Veterans claims process (1)
- Walch v. Shinseki (1)
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Disability Law
Imperfect Insanity And Diminished Responsibility, Lea Johnston
Imperfect Insanity And Diminished Responsibility, Lea Johnston
UF Law Faculty Publications
Insanity’s status as an all-or-nothing excuse results in the disproportionate punishment of individuals whose mental disorders significantly impaired, but did not obliterate, their capacities for criminal responsibility. Prohibiting the trier of fact from considering impairment that does not meet the narrow definition of insanity contradicts commonly held intuitions about mental abnormality and gradations of responsibility. It results in systemic over-punishment, juror frustration, and, at times, arbitrary verdicts as triers of fact attempt to better apportion liability to blameworthiness.
This Article proposes a generic partial excuse of Diminished Responsibility from Mental Disability, to be asserted as an affirmative defense at the …
Veterans Benefits In 2010: A New Dialogue Between The Supreme Court And The Federal Circuit, Paul R. Gugliuzza
Veterans Benefits In 2010: A New Dialogue Between The Supreme Court And The Federal Circuit, Paul R. Gugliuzza
UF Law Faculty Publications
The Supreme Court of the United States rarely grants certiorari in a veterans benefits case. Congress gave the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit exclusive jurisdiction over veterans appeals in 1988 but, until 2009, the Supreme Court had reviewed only two Federal Circuit veterans decisions. In the 2010 Term, however, the Court decided its second veterans case in less than two years. Although patent lawyers are familiar with a trend of increasing Supreme Court interest in the Federal Circuit’s work, little attention has been paid to the similar, albeit incipient, trend that may be emerging in the …
Ten Federal Circuit Cases From 2009 That Veterans Benefits Attorneys Should Know, Paul R. Gugliuzza, Miguel F. Eaton, Sumon Dantiki
Ten Federal Circuit Cases From 2009 That Veterans Benefits Attorneys Should Know, Paul R. Gugliuzza, Miguel F. Eaton, Sumon Dantiki
UF Law Faculty Publications
The Federal Circuit is the highest court to which veterans can appeal by right for benefits. In 2009, the Federal Circuit decided eighty-seven veterans cases (twelve percent of its overall docket). Twenty-six of those decisions were precedential opinions. There are approximately 23.4 million veterans in the United States, more than three million of whom receive disability compensation. And with two ongoing wars, plans to increase the size of the Army and Marine Corps, and recent legislation impacting the veterans claims process, the Federal Circuit will likely see an increase in veterans cases in the coming years.
Part I of this …