Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Disability insurance (5)
- Social security (5)
- Benefits (2)
- Chater (2)
- Cross-examination (2)
-
- Physicians (2)
- Addiction (1)
- Administrative law (1)
- Administrative procedure (1)
- Bush (1)
- Capacity (1)
- Commissioner of Social Security (1)
- Disability (1)
- Disability evaluation (1)
- Due process (1)
- Due process of law (1)
- Examiners (1)
- Flatford (1)
- Litigation (1)
- Passmore v. Astrue (1)
- Pratts (1)
- Richardson v. Perales (1)
- Shalala (1)
- Social Security (1)
- Social Security Administration (1)
- Social Security Disability System (1)
- Social security beneficiaries (1)
- Social security disability cases (1)
- Subpoena (1)
- Substance abuse (1)
Articles 1 - 7 of 7
Full-Text Articles in Disability Law
Note: Flatford V. Chater: No Absolute Due Process Right To Subpoena A Physician Providing Post-Hearing Evidence At A Social Security Disability Hearing, James L. Hoyle
Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary
No abstract provided.
Note: Bush V. Shalala And Pratts V. Chater: Social Security Disability Ping Pong And Contrasting Approaches In The Second Circuit: The Central Role Of An Active Alj, Jorge J. Vera Jr.
Note: Bush V. Shalala And Pratts V. Chater: Social Security Disability Ping Pong And Contrasting Approaches In The Second Circuit: The Central Role Of An Active Alj, Jorge J. Vera Jr.
Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary
No abstract provided.
The Right To Cross-Examine Physicians In Social Security Disability Cases, Victor G. Rosenblum
The Right To Cross-Examine Physicians In Social Security Disability Cases, Victor G. Rosenblum
Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary
This Article examines the alternative readings and rationales of Richardson v. Perales regarding the cross-examination of reporting physicians in social security disability claim hearings. First, Part II compares the Sixth and Second Circuit's interpretation of the Perales rule, which supports the SSA's regulation and interpretation, to the Fifth Circuit's interpretation, which explicitly proclaims cross-examination, once duly requested, to be an absolute right. Part III questions whether the Perales Court's declaration that the SSA is “an [impartial] adjudicator and not . . . an advocate or adversary” remains empirically valid. Part IV discusses the SSA's recent assertions of management prerogatives that …
Was The Third Circuit Off Base In Failing To Accord Chevron Deference To Social Security Administration's Interpretation Of The Statute's Definition Of Disability?, Victor G. Rosenblum
Was The Third Circuit Off Base In Failing To Accord Chevron Deference To Social Security Administration's Interpretation Of The Statute's Definition Of Disability?, Victor G. Rosenblum
Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary
No abstract provided.
Tobacco Abuse And Disability Benefits: Response To The 2003 Meisburg Analysis, Kathryn A. Kroggel
Tobacco Abuse And Disability Benefits: Response To The 2003 Meisburg Analysis, Kathryn A. Kroggel
Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary
No abstract provided.
Toward A Unified And Reciprocal Disability System, Paul Armstrong
Toward A Unified And Reciprocal Disability System, Paul Armstrong
Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary
No abstract provided.
There But For The Grace Of God Go I: The Right Of Cross-Examination In Social Security Disability Hearings , Bradley S. Dixon
There But For The Grace Of God Go I: The Right Of Cross-Examination In Social Security Disability Hearings , Bradley S. Dixon
Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary
No abstract provided.