Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Affirmative action (1)
- Anti-discrimination (1)
- Burden of Proof (1)
- Charter of Fundamental Rights (1)
- Civil Rights Act (1)
-
- Civil rights (1)
- Council of Europe (1)
- ECHR (1)
- ECJ (1)
- EDF (1)
- EU (1)
- Employment Directive (1)
- Equal Treatment Directive (1)
- European Court of Human Rights (1)
- European Court of Justice (1)
- European Disability Forum (1)
- European Union (1)
- Execution of the Mentally Retarded (1)
- Georgia Law (1)
- Human rights (1)
- Positive action (1)
- Race Directive (1)
- Treaty of Amsterdam (1)
- Treaty of Rome (1)
Articles 1 - 2 of 2
Full-Text Articles in Disability Law
Equality And The European Union, Elizabeth F. Defeis
Equality And The European Union, Elizabeth F. Defeis
Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law
No abstract provided.
Beyond A Reasonable Doubt: The Constitutionality Of Georgia's Burden Of Proof In Executing The Mentally Retarded, Veronica M. O'Grady
Beyond A Reasonable Doubt: The Constitutionality Of Georgia's Burden Of Proof In Executing The Mentally Retarded, Veronica M. O'Grady
Georgia Law Review
In 2002, the Supreme Court in Atkins v. Virginia announced that executing mentally retarded defendants violates the Constitution. Georgia's standard for determining whether a criminal defendant is mentally retarded-and therefore ineligible for the death penalty- is the highest in the nation, requiring defendants to prove mental retardation to a jury, during the guilt and innocence phase, beyond a reasonable doubt. As in the case of Warren Lee Hill, Jr., this high burden necessarily results in Georgia executing defendants who are almost certainly mentally retarded,arguably violating the Atkins directive. Though once the first state to create a ban on executing the …