Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Contracts
Ucc Section 9-301 (1) And Accounts, Contract Rights, And Chattel Paper: The Non-Existent Priorities, Anon
Ucc Section 9-301 (1) And Accounts, Contract Rights, And Chattel Paper: The Non-Existent Priorities, Anon
Washington Law Review
It has been said that "fortunately ... experience indicates that the practical importance of . . . [Uniform Commercial Code priority] problems is probably less than their intellectual challenge."' This may be fair warning to eager students, lawyers, and legal scholars. Such warnings, however, are seldom heeded, and pursuits of intellectual challenge are often productive. Constructive analysis of section 9-301(1) (c) and (1) (d) of the Uniform Commercial Code, insofar as they relate to "chattel paper," "accounts," and "contract rights," may prove to be most beneficial.
Sufficiency Of Proof To Establish Implied Contract, Anon
Sufficiency Of Proof To Establish Implied Contract, Anon
Washington Law Review
Plaintiffs, husband and wife, brought suit against decedent's estate for specific performance of an oral contract to convey or devise real property in return for personal services. An alternative claim asked for the reasonable value of services rendered and expenses paid by plaintiffs in decedent's behalf, and at his request, during the three years preceding his death. Plaintiff wife served as decedent's nurse, housekeeper and occasional provider during this period. Plaintiff husband performed various odd jobs at decedent's request. Throughout this period, plaintiffs received no compensation beyond infrequent use of decedent's lake cabin. Two witnesses testified that decedent told them …
Unconscionability In Consumer Sales Contracts—A Defense To Actions At Law, And Under The Ucc, Anon
Unconscionability In Consumer Sales Contracts—A Defense To Actions At Law, And Under The Ucc, Anon
Washington Law Review
Plaintiff, operator of a retail furniture store, sold a five hundred dollar stereo set on installment contract to defendant Williams, knowing that defendant supported herself and seven children on a two hundred eighteen dollar monthly welfare payment. At the time defendant bought the set, she owed plaintiff one hundred sixty four dollars on thirteen prior purchases. The form contract provided that plaintiff would retain title to all items purchased until the purchaser had paid all amounts due in full, and that the debt on each item was secured by the right to repossess all items purchased. When defendant defaulted shortly …