Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- File Type
Articles 1 - 9 of 9
Full-Text Articles in Law
It's About Time: The Long Overdue Demise Of Statutes Of Repose In Latent Toxic Tort Litigation, Jean M. Eggen
It's About Time: The Long Overdue Demise Of Statutes Of Repose In Latent Toxic Tort Litigation, Jean M. Eggen
Jean M. Eggen
Toxic Torts In A Nutshell, Jean Eggen
Mental Disabilities And Duty In Negligence Law: Will Neuroscience Reform Tort Doctrine?, Jean Eggen
Mental Disabilities And Duty In Negligence Law: Will Neuroscience Reform Tort Doctrine?, Jean Eggen
Jean M. Eggen
Recent developments in neuroscience may contribute to some long-needed changes in negligence law. One negligence rule in need of reform is the duty rule allowing physical disabilities to be considered in determining whether a party acted negligently, but disallowing mental disabilities for adult tortfeasors. Further, this bifurcated rule applies imposes an objective standard only on adults alleged to have acted negligently. A subjective standard applies to all parties in intentional torts and to children in negligence actions. Courts justify the bifurcated rule for adults on policy grounds, but these policy underpinnings are no longer valid in contemporary society. More accurate …
Toward A Neuroscience Model Of Tort Law: How Functional Neuroimaging Will Transform Tort Doctrine, Jean Eggen, Eric Laury
Toward A Neuroscience Model Of Tort Law: How Functional Neuroimaging Will Transform Tort Doctrine, Jean Eggen, Eric Laury
Jean M. Eggen
The “neuroscience revolution” has now gained the attention of legal thinkers and is poised to be the catalyst for significant changes in the law. Over the past several decades, research in functional neuroimaging has sought to explain a vast array of human thought processes and behaviors, and the law has taken notice. Although functional neuroimaging is not yet close to being a staple in the courtroom, the information acquired from these studies has been featured in a handful of cases, including a few before the United States Supreme Court. Our assertion involves the incorporation of functional neuroscience evidence in tort …
Federal Preemption Of Claims Based On Cell Phone Hazards: Farina V. Nokia And The Road To The U.S. Supreme Court, Jean Eggen
Jean M. Eggen
No abstract provided.
Punitive Damages And The Public Health Agenda, Jean Eggen
Punitive Damages And The Public Health Agenda, Jean Eggen
Jean M. Eggen
No abstract provided.
The Mature Product Preemption Doctrine: The Unitary Standard And The Paradox Of Consumer Protection, Jean M. Eggen
The Mature Product Preemption Doctrine: The Unitary Standard And The Paradox Of Consumer Protection, Jean M. Eggen
Jean M. Eggen
The history of the U.S. Supreme Court's product preemption doctrine has been characterized by inconsistency and confusion. Product regulation and common-law product liability actions are primarily concerned with assuring the health and safety of the consuming public, and it is not surprising that the Court's product preemption decisions have focused substantially on medical devices and drugs. Recent government studies have shown, however, that the FDA is hampered in reaching its safety goals by insufficient resources and increasing demands. This article reassesses the Court's product preemption doctrine in the light of a triad of new decisions issued in 2008 and 2009. …
Punitive Damages And The Tobacco Industry: New Guidelines From The U. S. Supreme Court, Jean M. Eggen
Punitive Damages And The Tobacco Industry: New Guidelines From The U. S. Supreme Court, Jean M. Eggen
Jean M. Eggen
No abstract provided.
Foreword, Jean M. Eggen