Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
- File Type
Articles 1 - 8 of 8
Full-Text Articles in Law
Defenseless Self-Defense: An Essay On Goldberg And Zipursky's Civil Recourse Defended, Alan Calnan
Defenseless Self-Defense: An Essay On Goldberg And Zipursky's Civil Recourse Defended, Alan Calnan
Alan Calnan
In a recent symposium published by the Indiana Law Journal, Professors John C.P. Goldberg and Benjamin C. Zipursky offer a spirited defense of their theory of civil recourse, which sees the tort system exclusively as a means of empowering victims of wrongs. This essay assails that defense, finding it curiously defenseless in three related respects. First, civil recourse’s key tenets are particularly vulnerable to criticism because they are quietly reductive, inscrutably vague, and highly unstable. Second, even in its most coherent form, civil recourse theory literally lacks any meaningful explanation of the defensive rights at play within the tort system. …
The Distorted Reality Of Civil Recourse Theory, Alan Calnan
The Distorted Reality Of Civil Recourse Theory, Alan Calnan
Alan Calnan
In their recent article Torts as Wrongs, Professors John C.P. Goldberg and Benjamin C. Zipursky offer their most complete and accessible explanation of the civil recourse theory (CRT) of tort law. A purely descriptive account, CRT holds that tort law is exclusively a scheme of private rights for the redress of legal wrongs and is not a pragmatic mechanism for imposing strict liability or implementing public policy. The present paper challenges this view by revealing critical errors in its perspective, methodology, and analysis. It shows that Goldberg and Zipursky do not objectively observe tort law and uncritically report what they …
What's Wrong With "Torts As Wrongs" (Or Redirecting Civil Recourse Theory), Alan Calnan
What's Wrong With "Torts As Wrongs" (Or Redirecting Civil Recourse Theory), Alan Calnan
Alan Calnan
In Torts as Wrongs, Professors John C.P. Goldberg and Benjamin C. Zipursky offer their most complete and accessible explanation of the civil recourse theory of tort law. A purely descriptive account, civil recourse theory has both positive and negative components. The positive side holds that tort law is a scheme of private rights for the redress of legal wrongs, while the negative side says the law eschews strict liability and forbids instrumentalism. The present paper challenges both prongs of this theory, identifying three problems which undermine its credibility. First, Goldberg and Zipursky do not objectively observe tort law and uncritically …
The Instrumental Justice Of Private Law, Alan Calnan
The Instrumental Justice Of Private Law, Alan Calnan
Alan Calnan
Instrumentalists and deontologists have long battled for an exclusive theory of private law. The instrumentalists have argued that private law is merely a means to achieving any number of political or social ends. Deontologists, by contrast, have contended that the law seeks only the moral end of justice and cannot be used for anything else. In this article, I critique these extreme positions and offer an intermediate theory called “instrumental justice.” I show that the absolute instrumental view is elusive, illusory, and illiberal, while the absolute deontological view is incoherent, implausible, and in one critical respect, impossible. Instrumental justice avoids …
Strict Liability And The Liberal-Justice Theory Of Torts, Alan Calnan
Strict Liability And The Liberal-Justice Theory Of Torts, Alan Calnan
Alan Calnan
Abstract Tort scholars disagree about the relative priority of fault and strict liability. Economists prefer the clearer and more efficient theory of strict liability to the vaguer and more complicated concept of fault. Moralists, by contrast, prefer the deep moral or deontological idea of fault to the more sterile rule of strict liability. Ironically, both economists and moralists often base their views on liberal principles. Economists rely on the political dimension of liberalism, arguing that tort law should interfere with free market transactions only rarely, and even then, only with clear rules that minimize accident costs. Not surprisingly, moralists rely …
Reasonableness, Justice And The No-Duty-To-Rescue Rule Of Torts, Alan Calnan
Reasonableness, Justice And The No-Duty-To-Rescue Rule Of Torts, Alan Calnan
Alan Calnan
The no-duty-to-rescue rule says that people are not required to rescue others in distress. Thus, someone who fails to offer aid cannot be held civilly liable if the victim later succumbs to the danger. This liability exemption applies no matter how grave the risk facing the victim, and no matter how simple, easy and safe the rescue opportunity for the bystander. To most people, the no-duty-to-rescue rule seems clearly at odds with the concept of moral fault. Instinctively, it feels wrong to stand idly by as another human being suffers harm. This instinct could be rooted in a number of …
The Fault(S) In Negligence Law, Alan Calnan
The Fault(S) In Negligence Law, Alan Calnan
Alan Calnan
ABSTRACT According to conventional wisdom, negligence is a unique tort. It is different from strict liability because it is based on fault. Although it shares fault with intentional torts, negligence’s version of fault is different because it arises from the objective standard of reasonableness. This orthodox view has existed for nearly a century and has never been challenged. Even today, no one questions the strength of tort law’s theoretical superstructure or the truth of the assumptions upon which it is based. In fact, the American Law Institute, which currently is in the process of restating tort law’s basic principles, has …
A Consumer-Use Approach To Products Liability, Alan Calnan
A Consumer-Use Approach To Products Liability, Alan Calnan
Alan Calnan
In dicta, courts have had no trouble identifying unreasonable product uses. Indeed, over the years, they have compiled an extensive list of examples. That list includes the following pearls of wisdom. An automobile should not be used as a bulldozer. A shovel should not be used as a doorstop. A hunting and fishing knife should not be used to shave. A knife should not be used as a toothpick. An electric drill should not be used to clean teeth. A power saw should not be used to clip fingernails. A motorized hedge clipper should not be used to trim beards. …