Law Commons^™

The Evolution Of The National Court Of Appeals Controversy: An Emerging Negative Consensus?, James A. Gazell

Northern Illinois University Law Review

An examination of the debate concerning the creation of a National Court of Appeals. A consensus has emerged which rejects the proposal as premature and unnecessary. Thus, the Supreme Court may have to look to other means in order to ease the burden of its caseload.

The Decency Of Capital Punishment For Minors: Contemporary Standards And The Dignity Of Juveniles, Lawrence A. Vanore

Indiana Law Journal

No abstract provided.

A Moment Of Silence: A Permissible Accommodation Protecting The Capacity To Form Religious Belief, Andrew Woodbridge Hall

Indiana Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Patient Coercion By Hospitals: A Comparison Of Antitrust Standards In Hyde And Rumple, Cindy L. Porter

Indiana Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Letter From Peter J. Wallison To President Reagan Regarding Questions To Ask Rehnquist And Scalia [1986], Peter J. Wallison

Historical and Topical Legal Documents

No abstract provided.

Memo From Peter J. Wallison To President Reagan Regarding Rehnquist And Scalia [1986], Peter J. Wallison

Historical and Topical Legal Documents

No abstract provided.

Raul Memorandum Regarding Antonin Scalia, Alan Charles Raul

Historical and Topical Legal Documents

No abstract provided.

The Arizona Solution To Allocation And Use Of Groundwater, Betsy Rieke

Western Water: Expanding Uses/Finite Supplies (Summer Conference, June 2-4)

48 pages.

Augmenting Municipal Water Supplies Through Agricultural Water Conservation, David Engels

Western Water: Expanding Uses/Finite Supplies (Summer Conference, June 2-4)

38 pages (includes maps).

Harper & Row, Publishers V. Nation Enterprises - Rewriting The Fair Use Criteria?, Douglas B. Teaney

Northern Illinois University Law Review

An examination of the Supreme Court's first detailed discussion of the doctrine offair use in copyright law as embodied in the Copyright Revision Act of 1976. Particular attention is given to the Court's innovative analysis of fair use factors.

Compensating Manufacturers Submitting Health And Safety Data To Support Product Registrations After Ruckelshaus V. Monsanto, Eric E. Boyd

Indiana Law Journal

No abstract provided.

State Campaign Finance Schemes And Equal Protection, John M. Hamilton

Indiana Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Recent Developments: United States, Petitioner V. American Bar Endowment Et Al.: Supreme Court Finds Charitable Organization's Insurance Program Taxable, Barbara E. Wixon

University of Baltimore Law Forum

No abstract provided.

Filling In The Gap Left By Congress: What Is The Statute Of Limitations For Private Rico Claims?, Barbara Black

Faculty Articles and Other Publications

In increasing number, victims of business fraud are bringing lawsuits under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO). Since the statute does not set out a time limit for bringing suit, the courts must determine the appropriate statute of limitations. Malley-Duff & Associates, Inc. v. Crown Life Insurance Co. illustrates the difficulties Congress creates for the courts when it fails to provide a limitations period. RICO makes it illegal to engage in a "pattern of racketeering activity" for certain illegal purposes. A "pattern of racketeering activity" consists of at least two acts of "racketeering activity" within a ten-year period. …

The Supreme Court, The Mentally Disabled Criminal Defendant, And Symbolic Values: Random Decisions, Hidden Rationales, Or Doctrinal Abyss, Michael L. Perlin

Articles & Chapters

No abstract provided.

Book Review: The Constitution In The Supreme Court: The First Hundred Years, 1789-1888., David S. Bogen

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

The Secular Meaning Behind The Lemon Test: Lynch V. Donnelly

Touro Law Review

No abstract provided.

Can Mental Health Professionals Predict Judicial Decisionmaking? Constitutional And Tort Liability Aspects Of The Right Of The Institutionalized Mentally Disabled To Refuse Treatment: On The Cutting Edge, Michael L. Perlin

Touro Law Review

No abstract provided.

Recent Developments: Macdonald V. Yolo County: The Supreme Court Reexamines The Concept Of Inverse Condemnation In Determining Whether An Unconstitutional Taking Without Compensation Has Occurred, Michael D. Mallinoff

University of Baltimore Law Forum

No abstract provided.

Recent Developments: Posadas De Puerto Rico Associates V. Tourism Co. Of Puerto Rico: Supreme Court Upholds Constitutionality Of Regulations Restricting Advertising Aimed At Puerto Rico Residents, Eric P. Macdonell

University of Baltimore Law Forum

No abstract provided.

Interstate Commerce Commission V. American Trucking Associations, Inc.

Touro Law Review

No abstract provided.

Government Nonacquiescence Case In Point: Social Security Litigation

Touro Law Review

No abstract provided.

The Arbitrability Of Domestic Antitrust Claims: An Evaluation Of The American Safety Doctrine, Edward G. Heilig

Touro Law Review

No abstract provided.

The Supreme Court And Freedom Of Expression From 1791 To 1917, Michael T. Gibson

Fordham Law Review

No abstract provided.

Biographical Information Regarding Anthony Kennedy From White House Supreme Court Nominee Binder, Anonymous

Historical and Topical Legal Documents

No abstract provided.

Memorandum Regarding Robert Bork As A Possible Supreme Court Nominee [1986], Anonymous

Historical and Topical Legal Documents

No abstract provided.

Separation Of Political Powers: Boundaries Or Balance, Alan L. Feld

Faculty Scholarship

One of the most significant structural elements of the United States Constitution divides the political power of the government between two discrete political institutions, the Congress and the President, in order to prevent concentration of the full power of the national government in one place. This governmental structure has posed a continuing dilemma of how to allow for the shared decisionmaking necessary to effective government while maintaining the independence of each political branch. As the United States Congress reaches its two hundredth anniversary, questions concerning the relationship between Congress and the President, for a substantial time thought by legal scholars …

Comment On Professor Van Alstyne's Paper, Henry P. Monaghan

Faculty Scholarship

My major difficulty with Professor Van Alstyne's paper is its incomplete character. In the end, he makes only two points: first, judges are authorized to apply "this Constitution," not to do justice; and second, judges should not lie about what they are doing. The danger is that after a while the first point sounds somewhat empty, while the actual content of the second point seems entirely parasitic on the first.

Criminal Evidence And The Ear Of The Law, Daniel H. Derby

Scholarly Works

No abstract provided.

The Improper Use Of Presumptions In Recent Criminal Law Adjudication, Charles W. Collier

UF Law Faculty Publications

This note argues that, in developing the contemporary mandatory-permissive standard, the Supreme Court has misunderstood the effects of presumptions on juries. Presumptions that are ‘permissive’ in theory may nevertheless be ‘mandatory’ in fact, thereby leading some juries to convict regardless of their beliefs and inclinations. Thus, these legal presumptions may undermine the moral sense and political function of the jury.

Part I of this note shows, through doctrinal analysis, that the mandatory-permissive distinction is an anomaly in the Court's jurisprudence. Part II shows that this distinction is at variance with a substantial body of empirical social science research. This part …