Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Law Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Articles 1 - 4 of 4

Full-Text Articles in Law

Customer Sophistication And A Plaintiff's Duty Of Due Diligence: A Propsed Framework For Churning Actions In Nondiscretionary Accounts Under Sec Rule 10b-5, Michael Slonim Jan 1986

Customer Sophistication And A Plaintiff's Duty Of Due Diligence: A Propsed Framework For Churning Actions In Nondiscretionary Accounts Under Sec Rule 10b-5, Michael Slonim

Fordham Law Review

No abstract provided.


Foreign Bank Participation In The United States Capital Markets: A Legal Perspective, Roger M. Zaitzeff Jan 1986

Foreign Bank Participation In The United States Capital Markets: A Legal Perspective, Roger M. Zaitzeff

Touro Law Review

No abstract provided.


Tax Shelter As A Security: The Use Of Tax Returns In A 10b-5 Action, Risa A. Levine Jan 1986

Tax Shelter As A Security: The Use Of Tax Returns In A 10b-5 Action, Risa A. Levine

Fordham Urban Law Journal

This student note examines the consequences to investors who initially invest through tax shelters, and whose investments later fail, resulting in liability. The author questions policy for treating those investments in a similar manner to other securities fraud, by looking at the history and procedure of a 10b-5 private cause of action. Tax returns can be used to evaluate the liability and penalties for SEC actions and the ensuing private actions. The author concludes that because 10b-5 actions are judicially created, they must be carefully cabined and screened for reliable indications of harm to the investor. Tax returns should be …


Of Lollipops And Law -- A Proposal For A National Policy Concerning Tender Offer Defenses, Ted J. Fiflis Jan 1986

Of Lollipops And Law -- A Proposal For A National Policy Concerning Tender Offer Defenses, Ted J. Fiflis

Publications

Early last year, Mesa Petroleum Company made a tender offer for shares of Unocal Corporation in an effort to take over Unocal. Unocal responded by using the "lollipop" defense, which is a discriminatory issuer self-tender offer. Unocal's use of this defense resulted in huge economic losses to many of Unocal's small shareholders who were not knowledgeable about the ramifications of their participation or non-participation in the tender offer. The Delaware Supreme Court upheld Unocal's use of this defense as an appropriate exercise of business judgment. A federal district court in California refused to strike down the lollipop under federal law …