Law Commons^™

Title Vi Of The 1964 Civil Rights Act And The Closing Of A Public Hospital, Mitchell A. Horwich

Duke Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Constitutional Law - Racial Discrimination - Thirteenth Amendment, Nicholas D. Krawec

Duquesne Law Review

42 U.S.C. § 1982-The United States Supreme Court has held that the official closing of a public street, resulting in a benefit for the white residents of that street and an inconvenience disparately impacting black residents of a neighboring community, is neither a badge of slavery prohibited by the thirteenth amendment nor an impairment of property interests protected by 42 U.S.C. § 1982.

City of Memphis v. Greene, 101 S. Ct. 1584 (1981).

The Supreme Court, Race, And The Class Struggle, Thomas Kleven

Hofstra Law Review

No abstract provided.

A Comment On "The Rhetoric Of Powell's Bakke", Jan Deutsch

Washington and Lee Law Review

No abstract provided.

The Rhetoric Of Powell's Bakke, Lewis H. Larue

Washington and Lee Law Review

No abstract provided.

Response To "The Rhetoric Of Powell's Bakke", James B. White

Washington and Lee Law Review

No abstract provided.

Municipal Hospital Closings Under Title Vi: A Requirement Of Reasonable Justifications, Carol A. Cimkowski

Fordham Urban Law Journal

Municipal hospital closings in recent years are a by-product of two phenomena: 1) the dramatic increase in health care costs and, 2) the fiscal crisis facing many cities. The impact of this reduction in municipal services is felt most acutely by indigent inner city residents, who, because of municipal hospitals receive a portion of their funding from the federal government, have been able to challenge the closings of acute health care facilities as a violation of Title VI of the 1964 Civil Rights Act. Whether plaintiffs can succeed in these suits depends upon the standard that federal courts will employ …