Law Commons^™

Labor Disputes In Professional Sports: How Federal Judges Referee Antitrust Lawsuits-- False Starts And Technical Fouls, Michael Leroy

Michael H LeRoy

Using a database of 83 published court opinions from 1970-2011, I show that players have utilized conflicting federal laws to improve their labor market mobility. They formed unions under the National Labor Relations Act, and bargained collectively with leagues. Often, however, they lacked bargaining power to modify the draft or reserve clause, which bound them to a team. Players sued, therefore, under the Sherman Act to challenge these practices as restraints of trade. Thus, players have used a dual engagement strategy of bargaining with leagues under the NLRA while holding identical negotiations under the threat of Sherman Act treble damages. …

Pignus In Causa Iudicati Captum And Execution Of Judgment According To Post-Classical Roman Law, Alexey Rudakov

Alexey Rudakov

No abstract provided.

Immigrant Laws, Obstacle Preemption And The Lost Legacy Of Mcculloch, Lauren Gilbert

Lauren Gilbert

Using Congress’ perceived failure to enforce the immigration laws as a backdrop, this paper will explore how the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Chamber of Commerce v.Whiting upholding the Legal Arizona Workers Act exposes some of the tensions and contradictions in modern preemption doctrine. Examining the relationship among express, field, impossibility and obstacle preemption, I explore three emerging trends, all evident in Chamber of Commerce v. Whiting. The first is an increasing reluctance of the Court to find implied obstacle preemption. The second related trend is an inclination to expand the scope of impossibility preemption beyond the physical impossibility cases. …

The Development Of Charity: Anti-Poverty Measures Of Ancient Jewish Law & Jurisprudence, William H. Byrnes Iv

William H Byrnes IV

This article describes the ancient Jewish practices, codified in Biblical law and later legal commentary, to protect the needy. The Jews’ anti-poverty measures - including regulation of agriculture, loans, working conditions, and customs for sharing at feasts - were a significant development in the jurisprudence of charity. The first half begins with a brief history of ancient Jewish civilization, providing context for the development of charity by exploring the living conditions of the poor. The second half concludes with a description of the Jewish laws, Mishnah and Talmudic commentary, as well as the practice and codification of Rabbinical teaching that …

Private Rights Or Public Wrongs? The Crime Victims Rights Act Of 2004 In Historical Context, Christopher J. Truxler

Christopher J. Truxler

Historically, crime victims served as policemen, investigators, and private prosecutors, and were regarded as law enforcement’s most dependable catalyst. The Crime Victim’s Rights Act of 2004 grants crime victims eight substantive and procedural rights and breathes new life into the common law idea that crime is both a public wrong and a private injury. The Act has, however, elicited ardent criticism. Opponents contend that the Act is both bad policy and, most likely, unconstitutional. Without commenting on the Act’s policy or constitutionality, this article places the Crime Victims’ Rights Act within a broader historical context where victims’ needs can be …

The Fetish For Authentic Race In American Law, Christopher A. Bracey

Christopher A Bracey

This article offers an interdisciplinary and transhistorical account of race authentication as it has evolved over the past two centuries within American law and culture. As 21st century Americans, we find ourselves in the midst of an authenticity revival – a reaction to the increasingly vapid and digitized world in which we live. We generally crave authentic items and experiences, and this impulse has gained increased traction in the racial context. Most commentators agree that American society has become increasingly multiracial, and that race now takes on diminished significance as a determining factor of one’s life chances. Yet there are …

The Distorted Reality Of Civil Recourse Theory, Alan Calnan

Alan Calnan

In their recent article Torts as Wrongs, Professors John C.P. Goldberg and Benjamin C. Zipursky offer their most complete and accessible explanation of the civil recourse theory (CRT) of tort law. A purely descriptive account, CRT holds that tort law is exclusively a scheme of private rights for the redress of legal wrongs and is not a pragmatic mechanism for imposing strict liability or implementing public policy. The present paper challenges this view by revealing critical errors in its perspective, methodology, and analysis. It shows that Goldberg and Zipursky do not objectively observe tort law and uncritically report what they …

Copyrighting Shakespeare: Jacob Tonson, Eighteenth Century English Copyright And The Birth Of Shakespeare Scholarship, Jeffrey M. Gaba

Jeffrey M. Gaba

In 1709, Jacob Tonson, the most significant publisher of his age, purchased the “copyright” to Shakespeare. Tonson and his family over the next fifty years went on to publish some of the most significant editions of the collected works of Shakespeare, edited by the likes of Nicholas Rowe, Alexander Pope and Samuel Johnson. In many ways, the Tonsons were responsible for the growth of Shakespeare’s popularity and the critical study of his work. This article discusses the significance of copyright to the Tonsons’ publication decisions. It suggests that the Tonson copyright did not significantly “encourage” their contributions to Shakespeare scholarship. …

Mr. Justice Horace Gray: Judicial Philosophy And Supreme Court Jurisprudence, Nick John Peter Meros

Nick John Peter Meros

The vast majority of contemporary biographic paradigms of Supreme Court Justice Horace Gray classify him as a ``nationalist,'' or ardent supporter of the federal government's interest and sovereignty over state and local governments. Legal historians and scholars cite decisions and opinions in which he promoted ``substantial and effective national government power'' over interstate commerce and upheld state government’s police powers as evidence for his ``nationalism.''

My research, however, reveals that Justice Gray repeatedly ruled against the federal government and for state and local interests. Moreover, Gray's opinions in favor of the federal government highlighted not its superiority over state and …

Puritanism, Godliness, And Political Development In Boston & The General Court (1630-1640), Peter Mazzacano

Peter Mazzacano

The goal of this article is to examine the degree to which Puritanism influenced early American political culture. That is, how did Puritan values and practices facilitate the development of an exceptional political culture during the formative years of Massachusetts Bay? Utilizing a case-study method of analysis, this article examines the political developments in the General Court and the town of Boston during the decade 1630 to 1640. The research methods used are primarily the writings of leading Puritans, and concomitant town, church, and colonial records. The main finding is that the Puritans paid little heed to notions of democracy, …

., V V

Vinicius Pintas Marinho

.

From The Thief In The Night To The Guest Who Stayed Too Long: The Evolution Of Burglary In The Shadow Of The Common Law, Helen A. Anderson

Helen A. Anderson

Burglary has been evolving from the common law crime almost as soon as Lord Coke defined it in 1641 as breaking and entering a dwelling of another in the night with the intent to commit a crime therein. But sometime between the Model Penal Code in 1962 and today burglary lost its core actus reus, “entry.” In the majority of jurisdictions, burglary can now be accomplished by simply remaining in a building or vehicle with the intent to commit a crime. Not only does such an offense cover a wide range of situations, but it allows burglary to be attached …

From The Thief In The Night To The Guest Who Stayed Too Long: The Evolution Of Burglary In The Shadow Of The Common Law, Helen A. Anderson

Helen A. Anderson

Burglary has been evolving from the common law crime almost as soon as Lord Coke defined it in 1641 as breaking and entering a dwelling of another in the night with the intent to commit a crime therein. It expanded early on to include breaking and entering buildings, not just dwellings, and the breaking requirement became little more than symbolic in many jurisdictions. But sometime between the Model Penal Code in 1962 and today burglary lost its core actus reus, “entry.” In the majority of jurisdictions, burglary can now be accomplished by simply remaining in a building or vehicle with …

Dicta On Adrenalin(E): Myriad Problems With Learned Hand's Product-Of-Nature Pronouncements In Parke-Davis V. Mulford, Jon M. Harkness

Jon M. Harkness

Gene patents of the type at issue in the Myriad case that is likely headed to the U.S. Supreme Court in the near future are based on an exception to the general principle that patents should not be allowed on products of nature. This exception holds that isolated or purified products of nature can be patented if they have commercial utility. It is widely recognized that this exception can be traced to language from an opinion issued by Judge Learned Hand in a 1911 case, Parke-Davis v. Mulford, which involved a patent dispute over a therapeutically useful version of the …

Formalism, Facts And The Brandeis Brief: The Making Of A Myth, Noga Morag-Levine

Noga Morag-Levine

The Brandeis Brief has long been central to historical accounts of the struggle and ultimate triumph of progressive jurisprudence over legal formalism. Yet this familiar storyline is difficult to reconcile with the historical record on two counts. The first is its incompatibility with the presence of extra-legal evidence in cases and briefs well predating that of Brandeis. The second is the fact that, contrary to the prevailing account, conservatives were not the vanguard of opposition to such extra-legal evidence. In practice, it was progressive defenders of social legislation who long sought to exclude proof regarding the alleged health and other …

The Myth Of Church-State Separation, David E. Steinberg

David E. Steinberg

The Myth Of Church-State Separation

by David E. Steinberg

Abstract

This article asserts that the church-state separation interpretation of Establishment Clause history is simply wrong. When they enacted the First Amendment, the framers were focused on the first five words of the amendment, which read: “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof . . . .” The Establishment Clause guaranteed that the federal government would not interfere in state regulation of religion – whatever form that state regulation took. Rather than enacting the Establishment Clause to mandate a separation of church …

“You’Re Creating New Categories:” Anglo-American Radical Feminism’S Constitutionalism In The Streets, Yxta M. Murray

Yxta M. Murray

In "You’re Creating New Categories:" Anglo-American Radical Feminism’s Constitutionalism in the Streets, I examine the constitutional meaning of two political protests: The 1968 Miss America protest by New York Radical Women and the 1970 British radical feminist protest of the Miss World competition in London. Using the work of Reva Siegel, Jack Balkin, and Lynda G. Dodd as a foundation for my inquiry into how these social movement protests influenced constitutional culture concerning women's rights, I first engage in historical and social analyses of the protests themselves. In particular, I study the different approaches the U.S. and British feminists had …

Getting Away With Murder (Most Of The Time): A Sesquicentennial Analysis Of Civil War Era Homicide Cases In Boone County, Missouri, Frank O. Bowman Iii

Frank O. Bowman III

In the quarter century centered on the Civil War, 1850-1875, fifty-three homicide cases came before the courts of Boone County, Missouri, of which Columbia, home of the University of Missouri, is the county seat. To remarkable degree, the story of these killings, told in this article, is a chronicle of the place and period.

The article’s method might be described as “murder as social history.” Its narrative thread is an effort to explain the remarkable fact that only twelve of the fifty-three defendants charged with murder were ever convicted of any form of criminal homicide. The explanation requires an introduction …

Missouri's Ring Tone: Jury Sentencing Rights In Death Penalty Cases, Jacqueline M. Whipple

Jacqueline M. Whipple

This Law Summary concerns recent developments in criminal law and the death penalty. It includes the national and state-specific legal background behind criminal defendants' rights regarding jury sentencing, and the latest interpretation and application of the U.S. Supreme Court's holding in Ring v. Arizona by the Missouri Supreme Court.

Justice Holmes At The Intersection Of Philosophical And Legal Pragmatism, Seth C. Vannatta

Seth C Vannatta

Because of the prolific scholarship on legal theory by Judge Richard Posner, especially since his turn away from law and economics toward “pragmatism,” legal scholars began reading “legal pragmatism” as references to Posner’s thought alone. My present task is part of a larger process of rethinking Posner’s version of legal pragmatism. Posner’s inspiration for his turn toward pragmatism can be attributed, in large measure, to Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr. Posner buys into three central insights of legal pragmatism, whose origins lie in the work of Holmes, anti-formalism, the prediction theory of the law, and a modicum of indeterminacy in judicial …

Saturday Night With Elliot Richardson And Robert Bork: A Case Study In Exemplary Executive Branch Lawyering, Jason S. Harrow

Jason S Harrow

In the wake of both the “torture memos” written by the Bush Administration’s Office of Legal Counsel and the U.S. Attorney scandal that led to the resignation of Attorney General Alberto Gonzalez, a large literature appeared criticizing the performance of high-ranking Bush-era executive branch lawyers. But there is very literature highlighting incidents of good executive branch lawyering — especially under trying circumstances.

In this article, I try to buck this trend by examining the events surrounding the so-called “Saturday Night Massacre”: the extraordinary evening in October of 1973 when President Nixon ordered Attorney General Elliot Richardson to fire Watergate Special …

“Health Laws Of Every Description”: John Marshall’S Ruling On A Federal Health Care Law, David B. Kopel, Robert G. Natelson

David B Kopel

If John Marshall, the greatest of Chief Justices, were to hear a challenge to the constitutionality of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010, how would he rule? Would the nationalist justice who, according to the New Deal Supreme Court, “described the Federal commerce power with a breadth never yet exceeded,” agree that federal control of health care was within that power?

In the fictional opinion below, Marshall rules on the constitutionality of a bill similar to the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.

We constructed this opinion chiefly from direct quotation and paraphrases of Marshall’s own words, …

Psychopathy As Sword Or Shield? A Legislative Proposal For The Greater Good, Vanessa Catherine Whirl

Vanessa Catherine Whirl

While mental health law has developed over the recent years as the fields of psychology and law combine their research, a gap is still left for one of the world’s most threatening mental health patients, psychopaths. Current legal definitions of “mental illness” exclude this diagnosis from legislation aimed at special attention and treatment of mental health patients. This issue is addressed in this article by legislative history, discussion of needed for changes in the laws regarding psychopathy, and analysis of the Hare Psychopathy Checklist. Finally, a proposal for legislation is made altering the prongs of current civil commitment statutes in …

Legal Ethics And Federal Taxes, 1945-1965: Patriotism, Duties, And Advice, Michael Hatfield

Michael Hatfield

Legal Ethics and Federal Taxes, 1945-1965: Patriotism, Duties, and Advice

ABSTRACT

At a time in which tax reform, tax shelters, and tax protestors are headline news, and the tax bar is debating the appropriate ethical standards for tax advice, Legal Ethics and Federal Taxes, 1945-1965: Patriotism, Duties, and Advice provides a timely historical review of legal ethics and federal taxes. Focusing on the first two decades of the modern income tax (1945-1965), the Article reviews the ethics literature of the tax bar, which was mostly written by very prominent tax lawyers (a founder of Paul, Weiss; partners at Sullivan & …

Legal Ethics And Federal Taxes, 1945-1965: Patriotism, Duties, And Advice, Michael Hatfield

Michael Hatfield

Legal Ethics and Federal Taxes, 1945-1965: Patriotism, Duties, and Advice

ABSTRACT

At a time in which tax reform, tax shelters, and tax protestors are headline news, and the tax bar is debating the appropriate ethical standards for tax advice, Legal Ethics and Federal Taxes, 1945-1965: Patriotism, Duties, and Advice provides a timely historical review of legal ethics and federal taxes. Focusing on the first two decades of the modern income tax (1945-1965), the Article reviews the ethics literature of the tax bar, which was mostly written by very prominent tax lawyers (a founder of Paul, Weiss; partners at Sullivan & …

The Kennedy-Hoffa Showdown: Why Congressional Investigations Need Greater Powers And Procedural Leeway Than Prosecutions, Nicholas C. Stewart

Nicholas C Stewart

ABSTRACT:

This 9,400-word article uses the feud between Robert Kennedy and Jimmy Hoffa as a case study to examine how and why congressional investigations differ from criminal prosecutions. It begins with a discussion of the 1950s congressional investigation into labor racketeering. Armed with this illustrative example, the article explores the relationship among (1) the purposes of congressional investigations (namely lawmaking), (2) the powers enjoyed by committees to achieve these purposes, and (3) the protections afforded committee witnesses. Highlighting the dangers inherent in congressional investigations, this article concludes that the ultimate goal of passing or amending laws presents unique challenges that …

A Brief History Of Fruit And Vegetable Juice Regulation In The United States, Ryan A. Ward

Ryan A Ward

This Paper chronicles the interesting history behind fruit and vegetable juice regulation in the United States. Part I discusses the use of tariffs and standards of identity to regulate juice from the early 1900s until the 1970s. Part II traces the history of labeling regulations for both 100 percent juices and diluted juice beverages — focusing on the 1974 diluted-juice proposal that was stalled for nearly fifteen years. Part III briefly describes the current label-focused approach adopted by the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act. Part IV concludes.

Dr. King’S Speech: Surveying The Landscape Of Law And Justice In The Speeches, Sermons, And Writings Of Dr. Martin Luther King Junior, Carlton Waterhouse

Carlton Waterhouse

ABSTRACT The belief that an essential relationship exists between law and justice has been recognized since the time of the ancient Greeks. In fact, the concept extends well beyond Western philosophy and jurisprudence. Distinct from other aspects of justice, the relationship between law and justice considers the nature of law and its dictates as well as the responsibility of citizens to obey it. Although Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. lacked the developed legal analysis of jurisprudence scholars, he made a meaningful contribution to the intellectual discourse of his time by forcing the discussion on the broader society and centering it …

Property, Liberty, And The Rights Of The Community: Lessons From Munn V.Illinois, Paul Kens Dr.

Paul Kens Dr.

Property, Liberty, and the Rights of the Community:

Lessons from Munn v. Illinois

By Paul Kens

Abstract

When considering the extent to which the United States Constitution places a limit on government regulation of business, today’s historians and constitutional theorists treat the question as a matter of balancing economic liberty or property rights against government power. Moreover, modern scholars commonly maintain that this balancing formula represents the predominant tradition in constitutional history. Tracing it back to the tenants of Jacksonian democracy that emphasized distrust of government, they imply that constitutional history has developed as a straight line: always with an …

Extracting Lessons From Illinois’ 2010 Special Election Fiasco: A Closer Look At The Seventh Circuit’S Decision In Judge V. Quinn And The Special Election Requirement Of The Seventeenth Amendment, Furqan Mohammed

Furqan Mohammed

This Note discusses the recent Seventh Circuit decision in Judge v. Quinn, in which the Seventh Circuit unanimously set aside Illinois’ Election Code under the Seventeenth Amendment because of the manner in which they filled vacant seats for U.S. Senator. This issue arose when then-Senator Barack Obama resigned from the Senate in November, 2008, to become President. When he resigned, Roland Burris was appointed to fill the seat. Illinois was not planning to hold a special election to fill Obama's seat because under Illinois Election Code, a special election to fill a vacant senate seat could only occur with the …