Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
- Institution
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 12 of 12
Full-Text Articles in Law
Security Council Resolutions In United States Courts, Janis P. Bianchi
Security Council Resolutions In United States Courts, Janis P. Bianchi
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Yonge V. Askew, 293 So. 2d 395 (Fla. 1st Dist. Ct. App. 1974), Florida State University Law Review
Yonge V. Askew, 293 So. 2d 395 (Fla. 1st Dist. Ct. App. 1974), Florida State University Law Review
Florida State University Law Review
Administrative Law- JUDICIAL REVIEW- REPORTS OF STATE AGENCIES CONSTITUTE COMPETENT SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCE TO SUPPORT DENIAL OF DREDGE AND FILL PERMIT APPLICATION EVEN THOUGH REPORTING AGENCY HAS NO JURISDICTION OVER PROPOSED PROJECT.
The Less Restrictive Alternative In Constitutional Adjudication: An Analysis, A Justification, And Some Criteria, Robert M. Bastress, Jr.
The Less Restrictive Alternative In Constitutional Adjudication: An Analysis, A Justification, And Some Criteria, Robert M. Bastress, Jr.
Vanderbilt Law Review
The past two decades have witnessed enormous changes in both substantive constitutional law and the courts' approach to constitutional questions. The frequent application of the doctrine of less restrictive alternatives has been a factor of increasingly significant proportions in effecting these changes. Although the doctrine has long been part of our jurisprudence,' it did not begin to have a serious impact until the Warren Court years, and, despite its widely diversified use today, the concept is almost always applied without discussion. Succinctly and broadly stated, the doctrine requires that a state not employ a specific means to accomplish an admittedly …
Some Random Thoughts On Judicial Restraint*, H. E. Widener, Jr.
Some Random Thoughts On Judicial Restraint*, H. E. Widener, Jr.
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Reconciliation Of Land Use Laws And The Right To Travel: Toward A Realistic Standard Of Judicial Review
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
State V. Douglas: Judicial "Revival" Of An Unconstitutional Statute, Mark Graham
State V. Douglas: Judicial "Revival" Of An Unconstitutional Statute, Mark Graham
Louisiana Law Review
No abstract provided.
Legal Inadequacies And Doctrinal Restraints In Controlling The Military, Edward F. Sherman
Legal Inadequacies And Doctrinal Restraints In Controlling The Military, Edward F. Sherman
Indiana Law Journal
SYMPOSIUM:
The Military After Vietnam: The Search for Legal Controls
"Time Of War" And The War Powers Resolution, Terry Moorehead Dworkin
"Time Of War" And The War Powers Resolution, Terry Moorehead Dworkin
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Election Inspectors Have Judicially Reviewable Discretionary Authority To Determine The Validity Of Proxies (Casenote), George Lee Flint Jr
Election Inspectors Have Judicially Reviewable Discretionary Authority To Determine The Validity Of Proxies (Casenote), George Lee Flint Jr
Faculty Articles
The Salgo court held that an election inspector, in a corporate proxy vote, was empowered with discretion to determine the validity of votes through a review of the transfer books. This decision marked a change from the standard course of American cases, which previously confined the inspector’s ability to a strict ministerial duty. An inspector’s discretion to review votes was limited under this interpretation. By limiting his inquiry to the transfer books, Salgo allowed the inspector to determine the validity of votes, but not who could vote.
Although the court did not apply the broader view of granting the inspector …
Judicial Review In Latin America, Keith S. Rosenn
Indian Wills: Tooahnippah V. Hickle--Administrative And Judicial Review, Randall Elliott
Indian Wills: Tooahnippah V. Hickle--Administrative And Judicial Review, Randall Elliott
American Indian Law Review
No abstract provided.
A Political And Constitutional Review Of United States V. Nixon, William W. Van Alstyne
A Political And Constitutional Review Of United States V. Nixon, William W. Van Alstyne
Faculty Scholarship
This comparison of United States v. Nixon and the Pentagon Papers case finds the greatest similarity and significance shared by the two cases was the anti-climactic nature of their conclusions. While both cases concerned constitutional questions of the highest order, centered around the scope of the executive power, both cases were drawn on such narrow grounds that there was hardly any effect on constitutional law doctrine.