Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Law Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

International law

1980

Northwestern Journal of International Law & Business

Articles 1 - 7 of 7

Full-Text Articles in Law

Mannington Mills, Inc. V. Congoleum Corp.: A Further Step Toward A Complete Subject Matter Jurisdiction Test, Walter S. Weinberg Jan 1980

Mannington Mills, Inc. V. Congoleum Corp.: A Further Step Toward A Complete Subject Matter Jurisdiction Test, Walter S. Weinberg

Northwestern Journal of International Law & Business

Jurisdiction of the American courts under the Sherman Act' has been extended to certain activities which take place outside of the United States. Such an extension is required by the inclusion of a for- eign commerce provision in the antitrust laws that states that restraints of trade or attempts to monopolize "among the several states, or with foreign nations" are violations of U.S. law. The exact reach of the Sherman Act to activities that take place within foreign nations or that involve foreign law is not clear. United States courts, however, generally have taken jurisdiction over foreign activities only when …


The Need For A Thoughtful Assessment Of The Application Of U.S. Antitrust Law To International Transactions, Mark R. Joelson Jan 1980

The Need For A Thoughtful Assessment Of The Application Of U.S. Antitrust Law To International Transactions, Mark R. Joelson

Northwestern Journal of International Law & Business

It is commonly said that the United States antitrust laws are a cor- nerstone of our free enterprise system and our economic philosophy. It is another truism--one of more recent origin-that the most significant markets and arenas of competition today are the international ones. The daily business news bears out this conclusion. Yet one must also conclude that the relationship between these two indispensable features of our economic life-antitrust laws and international trade-is a troubled one which provides ample material for confusion, dispute and law review comment. Moreover, the debate over the application of United States antitrust law to international …


Continental Grain (Australia) Pty. Ltd. V.Pacific Oilseeds, Inc.: An Unjustifiable Expansion Of Subject Matter Jurisdiction In A Transnational Securities Fraud Case, Joseph A. Marovitch Jan 1980

Continental Grain (Australia) Pty. Ltd. V.Pacific Oilseeds, Inc.: An Unjustifiable Expansion Of Subject Matter Jurisdiction In A Transnational Securities Fraud Case, Joseph A. Marovitch

Northwestern Journal of International Law & Business

This note will suggest that the holding in Continental Grain repre- sents an unjustifiably expansive application of the conduct test. Recog- nizing the Second Circuit's expertise in the securities law area, this note will critically examine the case of that circuit, concluding that the Sec- ond Circuit would not have found jurisdiction under the conduct test on the facts of Continental Grain.' Next, SEC v. Kasser,8 a Third Cir- cuit case relied upon by the court in Continental Grain, will be criticized as an unwarranted expansion of the conduct test. Unwarranted or not, Kasser also could have been distinguished on …


Gatt Dispute Settlements: A New Beginning In International And U.S. Trade Law, Donald E. Dekieffer Jan 1980

Gatt Dispute Settlements: A New Beginning In International And U.S. Trade Law, Donald E. Dekieffer

Northwestern Journal of International Law & Business

Although the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT)' has been in existence for over two decades, a workable system has only recently developed for resolving disputes between contracting parties. Since its inception, the GATT has been designed to promote the grad- ual dissolution of trade barriers between the major mercantile countries of the world.2 In its early years, the GATT approached this ambitious goal solely through irregular negotiating "rounds" at which the Con- tracting Parties (the nations signatory to the GATT) mutually agreed to reduce their tariff barriers. There was little attempt to develop an effec- tive enforcement mechanism …


Symposium: Transnational Issues In American Antitrust Law Jan 1980

Symposium: Transnational Issues In American Antitrust Law

Northwestern Journal of International Law & Business

On September 30, 1980, the United States Senate passed a bill that would establish a commission to study the international application of American antitrust laws.' The creation of this commission was prompted in part by the popular belief that the current application of U.S. antitrust laws impedes vigorous American export activity to the detriment of our competitive standing in world markets.2 On the other hand, several foreign nations, angered by extraterritorial application of U.S. laws, have recently enacted statutes that inhibit the ability of anti- trust plaintiffs in the United States to obtain discovery and to collect judgments. In this …


International Application Of American Antitrust Laws: Issues And Proposals, James A. Rahl Jan 1980

International Application Of American Antitrust Laws: Issues And Proposals, James A. Rahl

Northwestern Journal of International Law & Business

American antitrust policy in foreign commerce is once again under the pressure of complaints from at home and abroad.' It may seem anomalous that laws intended to protect competition are charged with impairing American "competitiveness," but that is the contention heard in Congress and in business quarters.2 Meanwhile, some foreign nations, including a few who have recently enacted new antitrust laws of their own, complain that our antitrust laws are too aggressive.3 Given the large amount of current discussion and the number of different proposals in Congress, careful study of the issues and of possi- ble solutions is certainly indicated.


What Should Be The Agenda Of A Presidential Commission To Study The International Application Of U.S. Antitrust Law, Douglas E. Rosenthal Jan 1980

What Should Be The Agenda Of A Presidential Commission To Study The International Application Of U.S. Antitrust Law, Douglas E. Rosenthal

Northwestern Journal of International Law & Business

If the proposed Presidential Commission to study the Interna- tional Application of the U.S. Antitrust Law (Commission)' is to com- plete its work within the one year period contemplated and is to achieve more than a superficial gloss of a large and complex area, I believe it will be necessary for the Commission to concentrate its atten- tion on the conflicts between the four important goals of foreign eco- nomic policy.