Law Commons^™

New Jersey V. T.L.O.: The Supreme Court's Lesson On School Searches Symposium On Education Law., Gerald S. Reamey

St. Mary's Law Journal

Considerable disagreement persists as to the fourth amendment rights of students within schools. Particularly, this disagreement regards the extent to which fourth amendment rights possessed by students may frustrate reasonable attempts by educators to maintain the order necessary to preserve an educational environment. In New Jersey v. T.L.O., the Supreme Court considered an argument advanced by the State of New Jersey that the “pervasive supervision” of school children diminishes the legitimate expectation of privacy a child may have in property “unnecessarily” brought to school. The Court concluded that the necessity of maintaining security and order in the educational environment was …

Beyond Conventional Education: A Definition Of Education Under The Education For All Handicapped Children Act Of 1975, Lauren A. Larson

Law and Contemporary Problems

No abstract provided.

Age Appropriateness As A Factor In Educational Placement Decisions, Evelyn M. Pursley

Law and Contemporary Problems

No abstract provided.

The Role Of Cost In Educational Decisionmaking For The Handicapped Child, Katharine T. Bartlett

Law and Contemporary Problems

No abstract provided.

State Response To The Education For All Handicapped Children Act Of 1975

Law and Contemporary Problems

No abstract provided.

Secular Contribution Of Religion To The Political Process: The First Amendment And School Aid, The , Louis J. Sirico Jr.

Missouri Law Review

In this Article, I first develop the thesis and evaluate objections to it. I also relate it to the thinking of the Constitution's Framers. Modern Supreme Court cases on church and state then are reviewed in search of acknowledgement of the positive dimensions of church-state relations. I conclude by applying the thesis to cases dealing with government aid to church-related schools and their students.

How And Why The Law Has Failed: An Historical Analysis Of Services For The Retarded In North Carolina And A Prescription For Change, Karen Sindelar

Law and Contemporary Problems

No abstract provided.

Is Justice Served By Due Process?: Affecting The Outcome Of Special Education Hearings In Pennsylvania, Peter J. Kuriloff

Law and Contemporary Problems

No abstract provided.

Variations On A Theme—The Concept Of Equal Educational Opportunity And Programming Decisions Under The Education For All Handicapped Children Act Of 1975, Judith Welch Wegner

Law and Contemporary Problems

No abstract provided.

Special Education In England And Wales, William G. Buss

Law and Contemporary Problems

No abstract provided.

A Political Method Of Evaluating The Education For All Handicapped Children Act Of 1975 And The Several Gaps Of Gap Analysis, William H. Clune, Mark H. Van Pelt

Law and Contemporary Problems

No abstract provided.

An Analysis Of Parental Rights In The Education Of Their Children, Marylou Brain Mundy

All Master's Theses

This study presents an analysis of the parental rights involved in the selection and direction of the education of their children.

Six kinds of source materials are examined in the study: (1) legal citations, annotations, and digests; (2) constitutions, laws, codes, statutes, rules, regulations, policies, and proceedings; (3) law reports, reviews and analyses; (4) general reading lists, books and periodicals; and (5) related graduate degree dissertations.

There were two major reasons for analysis of parents' rights in the affairs of learning and education of their children. They include (1) that many of the controversies involving parental rights have their roots …

The Allure Of Legalization Reconsidered: The Case Of Special Education, David Neal, David L. Kirp

Law and Contemporary Problems

No abstract provided.

In Re Parochiaid: Church-State Wall Of Separation Scrutinized-Again, Neal Devins

Faculty Publications

No abstract provided.

Book Review, Elaine W. Shoben

Scholarly Works

The Burden of Brown by Raymond Wolters is a long book with a very short message: integration is bad, but desegregation is not. The distinction between the two is crucial to Wolters's analysis. Desegregation is the prohibition of officially sanctioned separation of the races. Integration, on the other hand, is the compelled mixing of the races for the sake of mixing. The "burden" of Brown v. Board of Education, according to Wolters, is that the Supreme Court has blurred this distinction and erroneously requires integration instead of merely prohibiting segregation. Wolters's thesis is that Brown had two prongs: one …

Stough V. Crenshaw Country Board Of Education: Parental Rights And Segregation Academies, Stuart Melnick

Fordham Urban Law Journal

The author of this student note explores a recent 11th Circuit decision in Strough v. Crenshaw Country Board of Education, which held that the state's proffered interests were not compelling, and therefore failed to override a fundamental right. In the case, a county school board forbid its employees from sending their children to private school, and the regulation was contested by two tenured teachers who sought to enroll their children in a private, racially segregated school. The court eventually found that a parent's right to educate their child was a fundamental right, and the policy reasons advanced by the school …

Allocating Fixed Costs Of Dual-Use Facilities By Exempt Organizations: Actual Use Or Availability For Use?

Washington and Lee Law Review

No abstract provided.