Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Law
Re Cupe And Canadian Staff Union (Reynolds), Innis Christie
Re Cupe And Canadian Staff Union (Reynolds), Innis Christie
Innis Christie Collection
The Employer posted a position located in Halifax. The Grievor was denied the position because he was not prepared to relocate to Halifax due to family responsibilities. The Union grievance alleged that the Employer breached the Collective Agreement which prohibits discrimination based on marital status and place of residence, and that the Grievor's request to commute should have been accommodated. The Employer believed the position needed to be located in Halifax and that commuting from Newfoundland would not be effective.
Re Canada Post Corp And Cupw, Innis Christie
Re Canada Post Corp And Cupw, Innis Christie
Innis Christie Collection
The main issue before me here is whether the new dress code implemented by the Employer April 5, 1992, for uniformed employees, was within the power of the Employer in so far as it provides: The wearing of tags, buttons, stickers and other insignia is not permitted unless prior approval of the Corporation is obtained.
United Rubber, Cork, Linoleum & Plastic Workers Of America V Michelin Tires (Canada) Limited, Innis Christie
United Rubber, Cork, Linoleum & Plastic Workers Of America V Michelin Tires (Canada) Limited, Innis Christie
Innis Christie Collection
A COMPLAINT of Unfair Labour Practice having been made to the Labour Relations Board (Nova Scotia) on February 29, 1978, alleging that Michelin Tires (Canada) Limited violated Section 51 (1) (a) and 5 (3) (a) of the Trade Union Act;