Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Criminal Law (16)
- Constitutional Law (9)
- Criminal Procedure (7)
- Courts (3)
- Judges (3)
-
- International Law (2)
- Jurisprudence (2)
- Juvenile Law (2)
- Law Enforcement and Corrections (2)
- Legal Education (2)
- Legal Profession (2)
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (2)
- Supreme Court of the United States (2)
- Child Psychology (1)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (1)
- Cognitive Neuroscience (1)
- Disability Law (1)
- Economics (1)
- Fourteenth Amendment (1)
- Health Law and Policy (1)
- Law and Politics (1)
- Law and Psychology (1)
- Law and Race (1)
- Legal Biography (1)
- Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility (1)
- Legal History (1)
- Legislation (1)
- Life Sciences (1)
- Neuroscience and Neurobiology (1)
- Institution
-
- SelectedWorks (6)
- Selected Works (4)
- Cornell University Law School (3)
- University of Arkansas at Little Rock William H. Bowen School of Law (3)
- University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law (3)
-
- Boston University School of Law (2)
- Georgetown University Law Center (2)
- University of Baltimore Law (2)
- University of Michigan Law School (2)
- Golden Gate University School of Law (1)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (1)
- Pepperdine University (1)
- St. Mary's University (1)
- The Catholic University of America, Columbus School of Law (1)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (1)
- UIdaho Law (1)
- University of Miami Law School (1)
- Widener Law (1)
- Publication
-
- Articles (3)
- Cornell Law Faculty Publications (3)
- Faculty Scholarship (3)
- All Faculty Scholarship (2)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (2)
-
- The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process (2)
- University of Maryland Law Journal of Race, Religion, Gender and Class (2)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (1)
- Faculty Articles (1)
- GGU Law Review Blog (1)
- Ira P. Robbins (1)
- John Donohue (1)
- John M Scheb II (1)
- Jonathan Z DeSantis (1)
- Jules Epstein (1)
- Lee Kovarsky (1)
- Meghan J. Ryan (1)
- Pepperdine Law Review (1)
- Richard Daniel Klein (1)
- Scholarly Articles (1)
- Steven Mulroy (1)
- Touro Law Review (1)
- University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review (1)
- University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform (1)
- William W Berry III (1)
- david niven (1)
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 1 - 30 of 36
Full-Text Articles in Law
Plea Bargaining And The Right To The Effective Assistance Of Counsel: Where The Rubber Hits The Road In Capital Cases, John H. Blume
Plea Bargaining And The Right To The Effective Assistance Of Counsel: Where The Rubber Hits The Road In Capital Cases, John H. Blume
Cornell Law Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
The Legal Significance Of The Psychological Ability To Appreciate The “Other”, Paul F. Rothstein
The Legal Significance Of The Psychological Ability To Appreciate The “Other”, Paul F. Rothstein
Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works
Recently the U.S. Supreme Court, citing neurological and psychological studies, held that because juveniles are deficient in appreciating consequences to others, they should never be given the death penalty. The author found, in his years as a legal scholar, educator, and practitioner, that “appreciating the ‘other’”--putting oneself in the position of others---is critical to law and the study of law in more than the obvious ways.
The author became aware of empirical studies and psychological experiments demonstrating that children below a certain age have trouble seeing things from another’s vantage point, and found that the facility to do so develops …
John Donohue, When Social Sciences Save Lives, John J. Donohue
John Donohue, When Social Sciences Save Lives, John J. Donohue
John Donohue
If you think academic work can’t be “emotionally draining”, meet John Donohue, the C. Wendell and Edith M. Carlsmith Professor of Law at Stanford Law School, who’s teaching law and economics at Bocconi as a short-term visiting professor. In the last six years his academic interests led him to the death rows of Connecticut prisons and his work is the main piece of evidence in a trial which will decide the fate of five inmates sentenced to death and perhaps of six more.
Rational Criminal Justice, Andy Brunner-Brown
Rational Criminal Justice, Andy Brunner-Brown
GGU Law Review Blog
No abstract provided.
Tinkering Around The Edges: The Supreme Court's Death Penalty Jurisprudence, John Bessler
Tinkering Around The Edges: The Supreme Court's Death Penalty Jurisprudence, John Bessler
All Faculty Scholarship
This Essay examines America's death penalty forty years after Furman and provides a critique of the Supreme Court's existing Eighth Amendment case law. Part I briefly summarizes how the Court, to date, has approached death sentences, while Part II highlights the incongruous manner in which the Cruel and Unusual Punishments Clause has been read. For instance, Justice Antonin Scalia-one of the Court's most vocal proponents of "originalism" conceded that corporal punishments such as handbranding and public flogging are no longer constitutionally permissible; yet, he (and the Court itself) continues to allow death sentences to be imposed. The American Bar Association …
Gazing Into The Future: The 100-Year Legacy Of Justice William J. Brennan, Stephen J. Wermiel
Gazing Into The Future: The 100-Year Legacy Of Justice William J. Brennan, Stephen J. Wermiel
The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process
No abstract provided.
The Delaware Death Penalty: An Empirical Study, Sheri Johnson, John H. Blume, Theodore Eisenberg, Valerie P. Hans, Martin T. Wells
The Delaware Death Penalty: An Empirical Study, Sheri Johnson, John H. Blume, Theodore Eisenberg, Valerie P. Hans, Martin T. Wells
Cornell Law Faculty Publications
For the last five years, we have conducted an empirical study of the “modern era” of capital punishment in Delaware. By “modern era,” we refer to the time period after the Supreme Court’s 1972 decision in Furman v.Georgia, which invalidated all then-existing state death penalty regimes. Some readers might ask, “Why Delaware?” They might observe that it is a small state and is not a significant national player in terms of death sentences imposed or death row inmates executed. While both are true, several features of Delaware’s capital punishment system intrigue us. First, Delaware has a high death sentencing rate. …
Race And The Death Penalty: An Empirical Assessment Of First Degree Murder Convictions In Tennessee After Gregg V. Georgia, John M. Scheb Ii, Hemant K. Sharma, David J. Houston, Kristin Wagers
Race And The Death Penalty: An Empirical Assessment Of First Degree Murder Convictions In Tennessee After Gregg V. Georgia, John M. Scheb Ii, Hemant K. Sharma, David J. Houston, Kristin Wagers
John M Scheb II
We analyze over 1,000 first-degree murder convictions in the state of Tennessee from 1977 through 2007 to determine if either “race-of-defendant” or “race-of-victim” effects are present when it comes to the application of capital punishment. We control for numerous factors related to the demographics of offender and victim, as well as the circumstances of the crime itself and the availability of evidence. Our primary findings note that prosecutors are more likely to seek a death sentence when a victim is white, but we also find that juries are not affected by the race of the victim. We also find no …
Jewish Identity And Judging: Seymour Simon Of Illinois, Jack M. Beermann
Jewish Identity And Judging: Seymour Simon Of Illinois, Jack M. Beermann
Faculty Scholarship
Illinois Supreme Court Justice Seymour F. Simon (1915-2006) would have filled the stereotype of the righteous man in Jewish lore. He was a man of principle, communicated those principles in an insistent tone to anyone who would listen, worked hard to further the cause of justice and earned a reputation as a committed public servant. Justice Simon served as Justice of the Illinois Supreme Court from 1980-1988 after having served on the Illinois Appellate Court from 1974-1980. Before winning election to the courts, Justice Simon was a politician, serving, inter alia, as an alderman in the City of Chicago and …
The Death Penalty In The Twenty-First Century , Stephen B. Bright, Edward Chikofsky, Laurie Ekstrand, Harriet C. Ganson, Paul D. Kamenar, Robert E. Morin, William G. Otis, Jasmin Raskin, Ira P. Robbins, Diann Rust-Tierney, Charles F. Shilling, Andrew L. Sooner, Ronald J. Rabak, David V. Drehle, James Wootton
The Death Penalty In The Twenty-First Century , Stephen B. Bright, Edward Chikofsky, Laurie Ekstrand, Harriet C. Ganson, Paul D. Kamenar, Robert E. Morin, William G. Otis, Jasmin Raskin, Ira P. Robbins, Diann Rust-Tierney, Charles F. Shilling, Andrew L. Sooner, Ronald J. Rabak, David V. Drehle, James Wootton
Ira P. Robbins
No abstract provided.
Death Ineligibility And Habeas Corpus, Lee B. Kovarsky
Death Ineligibility And Habeas Corpus, Lee B. Kovarsky
Lee Kovarsky
I examine the interaction between what I call 'death ineligibility' challenges and the habeas writ. A death ineligibility claim alleges that a criminally-confined capital prisoner belongs to a category of offenders for which the Eighth Amendment forbids execution. By contrast, a 'crime innocence' claim alleges that, colloquially speaking, a capital prisoner 'wasn’t there, and didn’t do it.' In the last eight years, the Supreme Court has identified several new ineligibility categories, including mentally retarded offenders. Configured primarily to address crime innocence and procedural challenges, however, modern habeas law is poorly equipped to accommodate ineligibility claims. Death Ineligibility traces the genesis …
The Mandatory Meaning Of Miller, William W. Berry Iii
The Mandatory Meaning Of Miller, William W. Berry Iii
William W Berry III
In June 2012, the United States Supreme Court held in Miller v. Alabama that the imposition of mandatory life-without-parole sentences on juveniles violated the Eighth Amendment’s ban on “cruel and unusual” punishment. This case continued the Supreme Court’s slow but steady expansion of the scope of the Eighth Amendment over the past decade. In light of the Court’s decision in Miller to preclude mandatory sentences of life without parole for juveniles, this article explores the possibility of further expansion of the Eighth Amendment to proscribe other kinds of mandatory sentences. Applying the approach of the Court in Miller to other …
Execution By Accident: Evidentiary And Constitutional Problems With The "Childhood Onset" Requirement In Atkins Claims, Steven Mulroy
Execution By Accident: Evidentiary And Constitutional Problems With The "Childhood Onset" Requirement In Atkins Claims, Steven Mulroy
Steven Mulroy
The article discusses claims by capital defendants asserting that they are mentally retarded (MR) and thus cannot be executed under the 2002 Supreme Court holding in Atkins v. Virginia. Courts hearing such claims require proof that any intellectual deficits first occurred during childhood. This “childhood onset” prong is problematic for practical and theoretical reasons. As a practical matter, courts often improperly: (a) expect (rarely available) IQ test results dating from childhood; (b) dismiss MR proof if the defendant has minimal day-to-day competence, despite the medical consensus that MR persons can drive, cook, etc.; and (c) reject Atkins claims because the …
Death And Rehabilitation, Meghan J. Ryan
Death And Rehabilitation, Meghan J. Ryan
Meghan J. Ryan
While rehabilitation is reemerging as an important penological goal, the Supreme Court is eroding the long-revered divide between capital and non-capital sentences. This raises the question of whether and how rehabilitation applies in the capital context. Courts and scholars have long concluded that it does not—that death is completely irrelevant to rehabilitation. Yet, historically, the death penalty in this country has been imposed in large part to induce the rehabilitation of offenders’ characters. Additionally, there are tales of the worst offenders transforming their characters when they are facing death, and several legal doctrines are based on the idea that death …
Constitutional Concerns About Capital Punishment: The Death Penalty Statute In New York State, Richard Klein
Constitutional Concerns About Capital Punishment: The Death Penalty Statute In New York State, Richard Klein
Richard Daniel Klein
No abstract provided.
Should Delaware Execute Its Death Row 'Volunteers'?, Jules Epstein
Should Delaware Execute Its Death Row 'Volunteers'?, Jules Epstein
Jules Epstein
No abstract provided.
Unlocking The Eighth Amendment’S Power To Make Innocence A Constitutional Claim, David Niven
Unlocking The Eighth Amendment’S Power To Make Innocence A Constitutional Claim, David Niven
david niven
The U.S. Supreme Court has articulated no definitive constitutional bar to executing the innocent. While the text of the Constitution may not directly speak to the question, the court has elsewhere held, repeatedly and unanimously, that the operative meaning of the Eighth Amendment is shaped by decisions of state legislators. That is, if state legislators deem something cruel and unusual (executing minors, for example) it has therefore been rejected by society and is constitutionally barred. If legislators deem a particular practice acceptable, it is acceptable to society and thus permitted by the Constitution. Despite their significance in death penalty jurisprudence …
The American Historical Review (April 2012) (Reviewing David Garland, Peculiar Institution: America’S Death Penalty In An Age Of Abolition, John Bessler
All Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
The Folly - And Faith - Of Furman, John H. Blume, Sheri Lynn Johnson
The Folly - And Faith - Of Furman, John H. Blume, Sheri Lynn Johnson
The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process
No abstract provided.
Casting A Wider Net: Another Decade Of Legislative Expansion Of The Death Penalty In The United States, Jeffrey L. Kirchmeier
Casting A Wider Net: Another Decade Of Legislative Expansion Of The Death Penalty In The United States, Jeffrey L. Kirchmeier
Pepperdine Law Review
During the last decade, judges, politicians, scholars, and the general public have become troubled about problems with the death penalty in the United States. Also during this time, major studies of the death penalty have recommended a reduction in the number of statutory factors that make one eligible for the death penalty. Despite these concerns, legislatures continue to expand their capital punishment statutes to make more defendants eligible for the death penalty. This Article examines how, during a time of growing concern about innocence and arbitrariness in the death penalty system, a number of legislatures have continued to expand their …
Remedying Wrongful Execution, Meghan J. Ryan
Remedying Wrongful Execution, Meghan J. Ryan
University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform
The first legal determination of wrongful execution in the United States may very well be in the making in Texas. One of the state's district courts is in the midst of investigating whether Cameron Todd Willingham, who was executed in 2004, was actually innocent. The court's investigation has been interrupted by objections from Texas prosecutors, but if the court proceeds, this may very well become a bona fide case of wrongful execution. Texas, just like other jurisdictions, is ill equipped to provide any relief for such an egregious wrong, however. This Article identifies the difficulties that the heirs, families, and …
A Judicial David Versus Goliath: Prohibiting Capital Defendants From Proceeding Pro Se, Jonathan Z. Desantis
A Judicial David Versus Goliath: Prohibiting Capital Defendants From Proceeding Pro Se, Jonathan Z. Desantis
Jonathan Z DeSantis
This Article contends that capital defendants should be prohibited from proceeding pro se. The Article addresses the innate difficulties a self-represented capital defendant will experience while preparing for his or her trial, particularly if he or she is incarcerated. The paper then explores the troubling relationship between self-representation and capital punishment and opines that a capital trial with a pro se defendant cannot satisfy the "heightened reliability" the United States Supreme Court demands for capital proceedings. The Article states that existing case law allows a per se limitation of the constitutional right to self-representation barring capital defendants from proceeding pro …
A Judicial Retrospective: Significant Decisions By The Arkansas Supreme Court From 1991 Through 2011, Robert L. Brown
A Judicial Retrospective: Significant Decisions By The Arkansas Supreme Court From 1991 Through 2011, Robert L. Brown
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
In 2008, a study issued by the University of Chicago ranked the Arkansas Supreme Court as the second best state supreme court in the nation, based on the justices' productivity in issuing opinions, quality of opinions, and independence from partisan pressures. The last two decades have seen the Arkansas Supreme Court issue a multitude of opinions considering separation of powers, public education, prior restraint of the press, expanded rights under the Arkansas Constitution, class actions and tort reform.
This article highlights many of the most significant opinions from the last two decades and comments on their impact in Arkansas and …
Pain As Fact And Heuristic: How Pain Neuroimaging Illuminates Moral Dimensions Of Law, Amanda C. Pustilnik
Pain As Fact And Heuristic: How Pain Neuroimaging Illuminates Moral Dimensions Of Law, Amanda C. Pustilnik
Faculty Scholarship
Legal statuses, prohibitions, and protections often turn on the presence and degree of physical pain. In legal domains ranging from tort to torture, pain and its degree do important definitional work by delimiting boundaries of lawfulness and of entitlements. The omnipresence of pain in law suggests that the law embodies an intuition about the ontological primacy of pain. Yet, for all the work done by pain as a term in legal texts and practice, it has had a confounding lack of external verifiability. As with other subjective states, we have been able to impute pain’s presence but have not been …
The Limits Of International Law: Efforts To Enforce Rulings Of The International Court Of Justice In U.S. Death Penalty Cases, Sandra L. Babcock
The Limits Of International Law: Efforts To Enforce Rulings Of The International Court Of Justice In U.S. Death Penalty Cases, Sandra L. Babcock
Cornell Law Faculty Publications
Since the Supreme Court reinstated the death penalty in 1976, the United States has executed twenty-eight foreign nationals from fifteen different countries. Most of those foreign nationals were never informed of their rights to consular notification and access under Article 36 of the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations, a treaty the United States ratified in 1969. Violations of Article 36 in capital cases have caused consternation in foreign capitals and endless litigation in domestic courts and international tribunals. Mexico, which has the largest number of foreign nationals on death row, established the Mexican Capital Legal Assistance Program in 2000 to …
The Loss Of Constitutional Faith: Mccleskey V. Kemp And The Dark Side Of Procedure, Scott E. Sundby
The Loss Of Constitutional Faith: Mccleskey V. Kemp And The Dark Side Of Procedure, Scott E. Sundby
Articles
No abstract provided.
The Death Penalty And The Mentally Ill: A Selected And Annotated Bibliography, Jean Mattimoe
The Death Penalty And The Mentally Ill: A Selected And Annotated Bibliography, Jean Mattimoe
Articles
The United States Supreme Court over the last decade has selectively whittled away at the scope and availability of the death penalty by exempting certain groups from execution under the Eighth Amendment. In 2002 the court ruled that executing mentally retarded criminals violates the Constitution's ban on cruel and unusual punishment. In 2005 the court ruled that the Constitution forbids the execution of individuals who were under the age of 18 when they committed their crimes. Currently there is an active debate on whether to extend the categorical exemptions created by the Court to the mentally ill. At the forefront …
Innocence And Federal Habeas After Aedpa: Time For The Supreme Court To Act, Joseph L. Hoffmann
Innocence And Federal Habeas After Aedpa: Time For The Supreme Court To Act, Joseph L. Hoffmann
Articles by Maurer Faculty
No abstract provided.
Aedpa Mea Culpa, Larry Yackle
Aedpa Mea Culpa, Larry Yackle
Faculty Scholarship
In this essay, the author contends that the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 [AEDPA] has frustrated both the enforcement of federal rights and legitimate state interests. He lays most of the blame on the Supreme Court's methodology for construing AEDPA's provisions. The Court insists that poorly conceived and drafted provisions must be taken literally, whatever the consequences, and that every provision must be read to change habeas corpus law in some way. This approach has produced unfair, wasteful, and even bizarre results that might have been avoided if the Court had assessed AEDPA more realistically.
An Eighth Amendment Analysis Of Juvenile Life Without Parole: Extending Graham To All Juvenile Offenders, Robert Johnson, Chris Miller
An Eighth Amendment Analysis Of Juvenile Life Without Parole: Extending Graham To All Juvenile Offenders, Robert Johnson, Chris Miller
University of Maryland Law Journal of Race, Religion, Gender and Class
No abstract provided.