Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Publication
- File Type
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Law
Patriotism For Profit And Persuasion: The Trademark, Free Speech, And Governance Problems With Protection Of Governmental Marks In The United States, Malla Pollack
Malla Pollack
“Governmental marks” are words or phrases which involve the identity of a social group that is partly defined in terms of its citizenship in a government-institution. The power to name a social group (especially one from which exit is difficult) confers enormous power over the group’s members. Legally classifying such words as trademarks commodifies them, increasing the namer’s power: both by giving the word monetary value and by providing the mark-holder with the legal right to prevent others from manipulating the word’s meaning.
Destination marketing employing governmental marks has become ubiquitous. The municipal governments of both New York City and …
The Name Game: Cybersquatting And Trademark Infringement On Social Media Websites, Tom Curtin
The Name Game: Cybersquatting And Trademark Infringement On Social Media Websites, Tom Curtin
Tom Curtin
This Note explores the potential hazards and effects of the username feature on the proprietary interests of trademark owners, and argues that social media sites need to implement code based solutions to adequately address trademark infringement on their websites. Cited in Callmann's Unfair Competition, Trademarks, & Monopolies (2011).
Calibrating Copyright Statutory Damages To Promote Speech, Alan Garfield
Calibrating Copyright Statutory Damages To Promote Speech, Alan Garfield
Alan E Garfield
Copyright and the First Amendment exist in tension. The Supreme Court acknowledges this tension but says that copyright law resolves it with two built-in free speech safeguards: (1) by protecting only the expression of ideas and not the ideas themselves (the idea/expression dichotomy); and (2) by allowing the use of expression under certain circumstances (the fair use doctrine). The problem is that these doctrines are notoriously vague, so users often cannot know ex ante whether their uses will be immune from liability. This unpredictably might be tolerable if users could be confident that, if they were subject to liability, any …