Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Constitutional Law (133)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (33)
- Public Law and Legal Theory (27)
- Jurisprudence (22)
- Law and Society (22)
-
- Law and Politics (21)
- Criminal Law (19)
- International Law (19)
- Legal History (19)
- Criminal Procedure (17)
- Courts (14)
- Human Rights Law (14)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (12)
- Legislation (12)
- Religion Law (12)
- Judges (10)
- Law and Economics (10)
- Sexuality and the Law (10)
- Property Law and Real Estate (9)
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (9)
- Administrative Law (8)
- Indigenous, Indian, and Aboriginal Law (7)
- Education Law (6)
- Law and Psychology (6)
- Social Welfare Law (6)
- State and Local Government Law (6)
- Economics (5)
- Environmental Law (5)
- Internet Law (5)
- Institution
-
- BLR (95)
- Selected Works (35)
- Fordham Law School (15)
- SelectedWorks (15)
- William & Mary Law School (6)
-
- Chicago-Kent College of Law (5)
- University of San Diego (5)
- University of North Carolina School of Law (4)
- American University Washington College of Law (3)
- Saint Louis University School of Law (3)
- Osgoode Hall Law School of York University (2)
- University of South Carolina (2)
- Case Western Reserve University School of Law (1)
- George Washington University Law School (1)
- Georgia State University College of Law (1)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (1)
- Pace University (1)
- Schulich School of Law, Dalhousie University (1)
- The University of Akron (1)
- University of Dayton (1)
- University of Georgia School of Law (1)
- University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School (1)
- University of Washington School of Law (1)
- Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law (1)
- Widener University Delaware Law School (1)
- Publication
-
- ExpressO (81)
- Fordham Law Review (15)
- Faculty Publications (7)
- George Mason University School of Law Working Papers Series (7)
- All Faculty Scholarship (5)
-
- University of San Diego Public Law and Legal Theory Research Paper Series (5)
- Alan E Garfield (3)
- Carlo A. Pedrioli (3)
- Juan Carlos Riofrío Martínez-Villalba (3)
- Mark D. Rosen (3)
- Saint Louis University Law Journal (3)
- Shubhankar Dam (3)
- The Ohio State University Moritz College of Law Working Paper Series (3)
- Articles in Law Reviews & Other Academic Journals (2)
- Brian Slattery (2)
- David B Kopel (2)
- Guy E Carmi (2)
- Kent Greenfield (2)
- Marybeth Herald (2)
- Michael R Dimino (2)
- Public Law and Legal Theory Papers (2)
- Richard Kay (2)
- Rutgers Law School (Newark) Faculty Papers (2)
- South Carolina Law Review (2)
- William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal (2)
- Akron Law Faculty Publications (1)
- Andrew C. Spiropoulos (1)
- Anne Poulin (1)
- Articles (1)
- Articles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press (1)
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 1 - 30 of 203
Full-Text Articles in Law
Winning Wirzburger And Defeating The Blaine Amendments: Arguing Present Efficacy Instead Of Past Intent, Brendan Michael Groves
Winning Wirzburger And Defeating The Blaine Amendments: Arguing Present Efficacy Instead Of Past Intent, Brendan Michael Groves
ExpressO
The case of Wirzburger v. Galvin, currently on a writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court, may set the tone for all religious discrimination cases in the future. Massachusetts’ constitutional amendments that proscribe any citizen initiatives from either dealing with religion in general or attempting to repeal the states Blaine Amendment are at issue in the case. Petitioner’s counsel, the Becket Fund, rightly views this case as paramount in the long-march to victory over the anti-Catholic Blaine Amendments still codified in 37 state constitutions. However, they have lost almost every stage of the case.
This article argues that Wirzburger and …
Help Wanted: The Constitutional Case Against Gerrymandering To Protect Congressional Incumbents, Walter M. Frank
Help Wanted: The Constitutional Case Against Gerrymandering To Protect Congressional Incumbents, Walter M. Frank
ExpressO
This article argues that the Supreme Court has been incorrect in treating incumbent protection gerrymanders as a traditional and acceptable redistricting principle. Part I of the article sets out 3 separate lines of attack on excessive incumbent protection gerrymanders. Part II makes the case for judicial regulation of such gerrymanders and proposes a standard that would create a presumption of unconstitutionality that could be rebutted. A process oriented remedy is proposed and potential obstacles to a suit are also addressed.
Quantifying Reasonable Doubt: A Proposed Solution To An Equal Protection Problem, Harry D. Saunders
Quantifying Reasonable Doubt: A Proposed Solution To An Equal Protection Problem, Harry D. Saunders
ExpressO
In this article we present the case that the Reasonable Doubt standard is in urgent need of repair. Our research reveals that a previously-recognized phenomenon arising from vagueness of the standard is more consequential than thus far realized and creates a serious equal protection problem. We show that the only legally feasible solution to this problem is to quantify the definition of the standard. While others have examined quantified standards, we make a direct case for it and overcome previous objections to it by offering a way to make it practical and workable.
The solution we envision will require new …
A Constitutional Court In The Absence Of A Formal Constitution? On The Ramifications Of Appointing The Israeli Supreme Court As The Only Tribunal For Judicial Review, Guy E. Carmi
Guy E Carmi
This manuscript reviews an emerging debate in Israel regarding the appointment of the Supreme Court as a Constitutional Court. Specifically, it offers a critical analysis of the most recent proposed model, which is now in the initial legislative stages (The “Neeman Committee”), to appoint the Supreme Court as the sole constitutional arbiter.
First, the article offers an overview of the main processes that have occurred in the arena of Israeli constitutional law in the last decade, generally known as the “Constitutional Revolution.” Next, the article shows the nexus between this process and the revival of the constitutional court debate. Readers …
Researching Georgia Law (2006 Edition), Nancy P. Johnson, Nancy J. Adams, Elizabeth G. Adelman
Researching Georgia Law (2006 Edition), Nancy P. Johnson, Nancy J. Adams, Elizabeth G. Adelman
Georgia State University Law Review
No abstract provided.
El Interés En Las Acciones Y Recursos, Juan Carlos Riofrío Martínez-Villalba
El Interés En Las Acciones Y Recursos, Juan Carlos Riofrío Martínez-Villalba
Juan Carlos Riofrío Martínez-Villalba
No abstract provided.
Judge Judges On How They Use Their Power, Alan E. Garfield
Judge Judges On How They Use Their Power, Alan E. Garfield
Alan E Garfield
No abstract provided.
Recent Developments In The Law Of The "Taking Issue", John C. Keene
Recent Developments In The Law Of The "Taking Issue", John C. Keene
ExpressO
No abstract provided.
Restorative Justice, Slavery And The American Soul, A Policy-Oriented Approach To The Question Of Slavery Reparations By The United States, Michael F. Blevins
Restorative Justice, Slavery And The American Soul, A Policy-Oriented Approach To The Question Of Slavery Reparations By The United States, Michael F. Blevins
ExpressO
This LL.M. Intercultural Human Rights thesis (May, 2005), awarded the best student paper prize for 2005 by the Institute of Policy Sciences at Yale University (in October, 2005), after analysing past and curent issues regarding the culture wars controversy of "reparations", proposes a specific process for establishing Truth and Reconciliation regarding the legacy of slavery in the United States. The proposal recommends commissions in each Federal judicial district under the supervision of a U.S. Slavery Justice and Reconciliation Commission (USSJRC), calling for "America's 21st Century Contract with Africa and African-Americans".
Resurrection From Babel: The Cultural, Political, And Legal Status Of Christian Communities In Lebanon And Syria And Their Prospects For The Future, Alexandra R. Harrington
Resurrection From Babel: The Cultural, Political, And Legal Status Of Christian Communities In Lebanon And Syria And Their Prospects For The Future, Alexandra R. Harrington
ExpressO
In the well-known Biblical story, the faithful, attempting to create a place of unity for themselves, set about building the Tower of Babel, only to see the Tower implode due to linguistic differences and power assertions. Thousands of years later, the world is still plagued by sectarian strife and warfare. Indeed, the situation has only become more involved since Babel, as there are now inter-communal and intra-communal conflicts for supremacy and superiority – a notable difference in these conflicts is that the ultimate tool of getting to Heaven is no longer a tower, it is now a state. Within the …
Taking Your Case To The Court Of Public Opinion – Strategic, Legal And Ethical Implications Conference, Geoffrey C. Hazard Jr., C. Ronald Ellington, Lonnie T. Brown, David L. Balser, Sally Yates, Peter Canfield, Bruce Harvey, Paul Butler, Joseph Gladden, Larry D. Thompson, Robert Rothman, Linda Disantis, Kenneth Canfield, Adam Liptak
Taking Your Case To The Court Of Public Opinion – Strategic, Legal And Ethical Implications Conference, Geoffrey C. Hazard Jr., C. Ronald Ellington, Lonnie T. Brown, David L. Balser, Sally Yates, Peter Canfield, Bruce Harvey, Paul Butler, Joseph Gladden, Larry D. Thompson, Robert Rothman, Linda Disantis, Kenneth Canfield, Adam Liptak
Conferences and Symposia to 2010
During the daylong conference, judges, lawyers and members of the news media debated the professional and moral consequences of discussing legal cases with the media.
The Corporate "Person": A New Analytical Approach To A Flawed Method Of Constitutional Interpretation, Jess M. Krannich
The Corporate "Person": A New Analytical Approach To A Flawed Method Of Constitutional Interpretation, Jess M. Krannich
Jess M. Krannich
No abstract provided.
Transgender Theory: Reprogramming Our Automated Settings, Marybeth Herald
Transgender Theory: Reprogramming Our Automated Settings, Marybeth Herald
Marybeth Herald
Over the course of the last few decades, both law and society have struggled to deprogram unhelpful and downright destructive gender stereotypes that are ubiquitous in our everyday existence. It has not been an easy task, nor entirely successful on either the legal or cultural front. Laws that prohibit gender discrimination, such as Title VII, have helped end overt discrimination. The next phase involves the challenging problem of unconscious bias, which often effectively keeps us treading the same mental paths while bypassing any roads not traveled.
It is not surprising then that when the validity of even the basic categories …
A Philosophical Investigation Into Methods Of Constitutional Interpretation In The United States And The United Kingdom, Louis E. Wolcher
A Philosophical Investigation Into Methods Of Constitutional Interpretation In The United States And The United Kingdom, Louis E. Wolcher
ExpressO
Most constitutional theorists in America and Britain are primarily interested in the contents of their respective constitutions. They pay less attention (and in Britain far less attention) to the methods that judges employ to derive those contents, and almost no attention to the philosophical aspects of judges’ interpretive methods. This article attempts to redress this imbalance by giving a distinctly philosophical description of the principal methods of constitutional interpretation that judges are inclined to follow in these two countries, and by developing the important distinction between the interpretation and the reception of a constitutional text. The act of interpretation is …
Seeing Government Purpose Through The Objective Observer's Eyes: The Evolution-Intelligent Design Debates, Kristi L. Bowman
Seeing Government Purpose Through The Objective Observer's Eyes: The Evolution-Intelligent Design Debates, Kristi L. Bowman
ExpressO
In October, 2004, the Dover, Pennsylvania School District became the first in the nation to adopt a policy requiring students studying evolution to be told about the concept of intelligent design. Soon thereafter, parents filed a lawsuit challenging the policy as violating the Establishment Clause. But, Establishment Clause doctrine is one of the most splintered, incoherent areas of the Court’s jurisprudence—and even more so after the Court’s June 2005 McCreary County v. Kentucky decision. Read strictly, McCreary County imports the effects-endorsement “objective observer” into the government purpose inquiry. This subtle shift has significant ramifications: McCreary County changes the nature of …
Making Free Speech Affordable: A Discussion Of Legislation To Provide Public Funding To Candidates For The U.S. Congress, Jared S. Cram
Making Free Speech Affordable: A Discussion Of Legislation To Provide Public Funding To Candidates For The U.S. Congress, Jared S. Cram
ExpressO
This article discusses a recent attempt by the U.S. Congress to provide for public financing of campaigns for the House of Representatives. Although a good start, this legislation would not go far enough to ensure that every voice has an opportunity to be heard in federal elections. My article discusses the strengths and weaknesses of this legislation and also provides suggested amendments to make this bill more effective should it become law.
Making Free Speech Affordable provides an in-depth comparison of this proposed legislation with current law at the state level providing for public financing of campaigns. This discussion includes …
Does The Icj's Decision In Avena Really Mean Anything To Mexicans On Death Row?, Kenneth Williams
Does The Icj's Decision In Avena Really Mean Anything To Mexicans On Death Row?, Kenneth Williams
ExpressO
This article assesses the legality of President Bush's order to state courts that they review the convictions and sentences of certain Mexican nationals on death row in response to the ICJ's decision that the rights of these inmates had been violated. The article also discusses the review process and makes a proposal to ensure that the ICJ's mandate is carried out. Finally, there is a discussion as to the importance of these cases to both the U.S. and Mexico.
Law And Economic Analysis On The Relationship Of Transparency And Voluntary Redistribution Of Wealth: Pursuing Both Efficiency And Equity At Once, Woo-Jong Jon
ExpressO
Charitable works can be analyzed as public goods or externalities. Eradication of extreme poverty and hunger, basic science research, and support for art and religion are public goods. These have non-excludability and non-rivalry, which are the defining characteristics of public goods, making philanthropist’s honor spread over more beneficiaries. And to achieve universal primary education is an externality because educations for the unlearned peolpe benefits both themselves and society at large. And in this knowledge and information era education is more and more important, thus society has to support the students who desire to escape from poverty helping them to receive …
Prosecuting Counterfeit License Plates: A Law Clerk's Constitutional Argument, Miguel R. Acosta
Prosecuting Counterfeit License Plates: A Law Clerk's Constitutional Argument, Miguel R. Acosta
ExpressO
The article discusses the status and probable future of the counterfeit license plate statute in Florida, Florida Statute Section 320.26(1)(a). It prohibits the possession of counterfeit license plates. However, it contains no explicit mens rea requirement. As a result, this law has been challenged repeatedly of late because it is punishable up to five years in prison and because it could potentially be used to punish innocent conduct.
The Transnational Judicial Discourse And Felon Disenfranchisement: Re-Examining The Textual Premise Of Richardson V. Ramirez, Jason G. Morgan-Foster
The Transnational Judicial Discourse And Felon Disenfranchisement: Re-Examining The Textual Premise Of Richardson V. Ramirez, Jason G. Morgan-Foster
ExpressO
This article is simultaneously an international comparative law piece about prisoner disenfranchisement in various countries, a transnational work of legal theory providing a framework for the use of foreign law in domestic constitutional courts, and a domestic analysis of the constitutional underpinnings of felon disenfranchisement.
The article begins with a comprehensive comparative analysis of the recent prisoner disenfranchisement decisions in Canada, South Africa, and Europe. It notes that the over-arching theme of these decisions is to view the acceptability of prisoner disenfranchisement along a continuum, where it becomes more acceptable the more serious the offense committed.
The article then examines …
Historicizing Judicial Scrutiny, G. Edward White
Historicizing Judicial Scrutiny, G. Edward White
South Carolina Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Original Meaning Of The Establishment Clause, Robert G. Natelson
The Original Meaning Of The Establishment Clause, Robert G. Natelson
William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal
No abstract provided.
The Supreme Court And The Federalist Papers: Is There Less Here Than Meets The Eye?, Melvyn R. Durchslag
The Supreme Court And The Federalist Papers: Is There Less Here Than Meets The Eye?, Melvyn R. Durchslag
William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal
No abstract provided.
Single Subject Rules And Public Choice Theory, Michael Gilbert
Single Subject Rules And Public Choice Theory, Michael Gilbert
ExpressO
Despite generating thousands of cases on important public issues, the single subject rule remains a source of confusion and inconsistency. The root of the problem lies in the inability to define the term “subject” using legal doctrine. This paper reexamines the single subject rule through the lens of public choice theory and finds that its purposes are wrongheaded. Logrolling is not necessarily harmful, and improving political transparency requires legislative compromises to be packaged together rather than spread across multiple acts. Riding is not a form of logrolling but an analytically distinct and more threatening practice. This analysis yields a precise, …
Through The Looking Glass: Judicial Deference To Academic Decision Makers, The Conflict In Higher Education Between Fundamental Program Requirements And Reasonable Accommodations Under Section 504 Of The Rehabilitation Act And The Americans With Disabilities Act., Douglas Rush
ExpressO
No abstract provided.
Towards A Basal Tenth Amendment: A Riposte To National Bank Preemption Of State Consumer Protection Laws, Keith R. Fisher
Towards A Basal Tenth Amendment: A Riposte To National Bank Preemption Of State Consumer Protection Laws, Keith R. Fisher
ExpressO
Recent regulations promulgated by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency assert a sweeping authority to preempt a broad array of state laws, including consumer protection laws, applicable not only to national banks but to their state-chartered operating subsidiaries. These regulations threaten to disrupt state efforts to combat predatory lending and other abusive practices and to interfere with a state’s sovereign authority over corporations chartered under its laws. Yet federal courts faced with challenges to these initiatives have failed to devote any substantial analysis to claims based on the Tenth Amendment. The problem with such claims is the absence …
The Constitutional Rhetoric Of White Innocence, Cecil J. Hunt
The Constitutional Rhetoric Of White Innocence, Cecil J. Hunt
ExpressO
This article discusses the Supreme Court’s use of the rhetoric of white innocence in deciding racially inflected claims of constitutional shelter. It argues that the Court’s use of this rhetoric reveals that it has adopted a distinctly white-centered-perspective which reveals only a one-sided view of racial reality and thus distorts its ability to accurately appreciate the true nature of racial reality in contemporary America. This article examines the Court’s habit of consistently choosing a white-centered-perspective in constitutional race cases by looking at the Court’s use of the rhetoric of white innocence first in the context of the Court’s concern with …
How It Works: Sobriety Sentencing, The Constitution And Alcoholics Anonymous. A Perspective From Aa's Founding Community, Max E. Dehn
ExpressO
This paper analyzes the public health as well as constitutional issues that arise when persons are required by courts to participate in 12-step recovery programs.
Broken Borders: Decanas V. Bica, And The Standards That Govern The Validity Of State Measures Designed To Deter Undocumented Immigration, Joshua J. Herndon
Broken Borders: Decanas V. Bica, And The Standards That Govern The Validity Of State Measures Designed To Deter Undocumented Immigration, Joshua J. Herndon
ExpressO
No abstract provided.
The Rules Of The Game: "Play In The Joints" Between The Religion Clauses, Sharon Keller
The Rules Of The Game: "Play In The Joints" Between The Religion Clauses, Sharon Keller
ExpressO
This article uses the case of Locke v. Davey as an exemplar of the new Establishment clause jurisprudence which has opened the door for greater governmental support of sectarian schools and enterprises. What I believe has not been truly appreciated is that the rhetorical approach that fostered the change, if followed consistently, should increase the government’s burden in justifying pressures or sacrifices of personal rights such as Joshua Davey faced in the exemplar case.