Law Commons^™

Two Valid Approaches For Determining Whether “Taxes” Get Priority In Bankruptcy Cases, Jonathan Fuller

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

In bankruptcies, tax status often effects whether claims are entitled to priority. Thus, debates about whether charges are penalties or taxes date back to the early twentieth century. In 1930, the Supreme Court established that courts are not bound to the characterization given to a charge by the municipality that created it. Rather, courts have a duty to consider the “real nature” and “effect” of the charge. Accordingly, different circuits have implemented different approaches to make these determinations.

This Article examines the ambiguity among circuits regarding charges’ “tax” status and resulting priority entitlement. Part I outlines In re Lorber …

The Intersection Of The Bankruptcy Courts And Ferc, Amanda Gazzo

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

In the past, the bankruptcy courts and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (“FERC”) have been involved in a power struggle with one another. Congress has granted bankruptcy courts exclusive authority to allow debtors to reject executory contracts in chapter 11 reorganization cases. Additionally, Congress has granted FERC authority to govern over utility entities’ filed-rates, which are sometimes contained in executory contracts. It is in this intersection, regarding executory contracts containing filed-rates, where the power struggle between the two exists.

An executory contract is a contract where both parties still have material obligations to perform under the contract. Filed-rates may …

A Hotel Does Not Meet The Definition Of "Single Asset Real Estate" And May Reorganize Under Subchapter V Of Chapter 11 Of The Bankruptcy Code, Patrick Canavan

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

Enacted via the Small Business Reorganization Act ("SBRA") in 2019, Subchapter V streamlines the reorganization process, allowing small business debtors to file bankruptcy in a timely and cost-effective manner. The goal behind the legislation is to encourage reorganizations, which will generally result in creditors receiving a higher distribution than in a liquidation and more small businesses surviving. Section 1182(1) of title 11 of the United States Code (the "Bankruptcy Code") limits those who can file a Subchapter V case to a "small business debtor" who does not own a "single asset real estate" project ("SARE"). Thus, if the debtor …

Courts Apply A Case-By-Case Analysis In Distinguishing A Meritorious Motion To Disqualify From A Delaying Litigation Tactic, Cathrena Collins

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

It is becoming increasingly rare for an attorney to remain at the same firm for an entire career. Lateral movements of lawyers coupled with large firms employing hundreds of attorneys creates ample opportunity for conflicts of interest to arise. The American Bar Association explains a conflict of interest is present when "there is a significant risk that a lawyer's ability to consider, recommend or carry out an appropriate course of action for the client will be materially limited as a result of the other lawyer's responsibilities or interest." Furthermore, Rule 1.10(b) dictates that a lawyer joining a new firm …

The Various Methods Circuit Courts Use To Define "Initial Transferee" In Fraudulent Transfers, Anthony J. Crasto

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

Transfers of a debtor's interest or obligation in property to a third party, made to prevent creditors from reaching assets in a bankruptcy case, are known as fraudulent transfers. Under current law, there are two types of fraudulent transfers: actual fraud and constructive fraud. Actual fraud requires findings of a debtor's "intent to hinder, delay, or defraud any entity to which the debtor was or became, on or after the date that such transfer was made or such obligation was incurred, indebted." Constructive fraud does not require a finding of intent and occurs when a debtor receives "less than …

Chapter 15 Recognition Is Necessary For Efficient And Consistent Cross-Border Proceedings, Sarah Franzetti

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

When Chapter 15 of title 11 of the United States Code (the "Bankruptcy Code") was adopted in 2005, it repealed the former section 304, which had often led to ad-hoc and inconsistent rulings for foreign debtors seeking assistance in U.S. bankruptcy courts. The new Chapter was passed to achieve greater efficiency on a domestic scale, as well as the "fair and efficient administration of cross-border insolvencies" by promoting greater cooperation between U.S. and foreign courts. For a foreign debtor to reap the benefits of this cooperation, a representative of the foreign bankruptcy proceeding must petition a U.S. bankruptcy court …

Erisa Withdrawal Liability Claims Unlikely To Receive Administrative Expense Priority Status In A Chapter 11 Reorganization, Bridget Golden

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

An employer who withdraws their participation in a multi-employer defined benefits plan is statutorily required to pay the plan a withdrawal liability. Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 ("ERISA"), as amended by the Multiemployer Pension Plan Amendments Act of 1980 ("MPPAA"), provides a number of formulas to assist a multi-employer defined benefits plan's actuary with calculating the withdrawal liability amount. Congress imposed withdrawal liability on withdrawing employers "(1) to protect the interests of participants and beneficiaries in financially distressed multiemployer plans, and (2) ... to ensure benefit security to plan participants." An employer's ability-and willingness-to pay withdrawal liability …

Enforceability Of Third-Party Releases In Foreign Proceedings Under Chapter 15, Anastasia Greer

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

In our increasingly globalized world, cross-border insolvency proceedings brought under chapter 15 (herein "Chapter 15") of title 11 of the United States Code (the "Bankruptcy Code") are on the rise - with over 100 additional filings in 2020 alone. Third-party releases are provisions in bankruptcy plans intended to release non-debtors (including shareholders, directors, officers, and affiliates) from claims creditors hold against other members of their class. A third­ party release can "act as a complete release, waiver, and discharge of that party ... arising out of or in connection with the debtor and its plan of reorganization." While the …

The Approval Of Retirement Contributions In Chapter 13 Payment Plans, Jennifer Hepner

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

In the United States, employees often contribute a portion of their annual income to their 401(k) retirement plans. These contributions may fluctuate based on age, income, or additional contributions by employers. At the same time, chapter 13 debtors are often required to pay at least a portion of what is owed to creditors as part of their court-approved payment plans. A court will only approve a debtor's chapter 13 payment plan if a debtor contributes all of his "projected disposable income" to pay creditors over the "applicable commitment period." While disposable income is defined as the "current monthly income …

Analysis Of Courts' Discretion To Enforce Arbitration Of Core Claims, Sarah L. Hautzinger

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

In general, a bankruptcy court has original and exclusive jurisdiction of chapter 11 bankruptcy cases. However, problems arise when a prepetition contract contains an arbitration clause, and a court must decide if it has discretion to enforce arbitration of a core claim. The statutes that play essential (but competing) roles in a court's analysis are the Federal Arbitration Act ("FAA") and the United States Bankruptcy Code (the "Bankruptcy Code"). In sum, "bankruptcy policy exerts an inexorable pull towards centralization while arbitration policy advocates a decentralized approach toward dispute resolution."

In these cases, a bankruptcy court must determine if there …

Assessing The Two Tests Courts Use To Determine Dischargeability Of Student Loan Debt, Sean B. King

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

The purpose of bankruptcy is to give honest debtors a “fresh start.” For debtors with student loans this purpose is not automatic, rather, the viability of the student loan programs takes precedence. For student loans, the default rule is they are not dischargeable in bankruptcy. Title 11 of the United States Code (the “Bankruptcy Code”) spells this out. Under section 523(a)(8) of the Bankruptcy Code, student loans must create an “undue hardship” to be discharged.

The issue is how courts determine undue hardship under section 523(a)(8). The term “undue hardship” is not defined in the Bankruptcy Code, rather, it …

Ownership Status Of Inherited Retirement Accounts In Bankruptcy, Aron Kaplan

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

Immediately upon filing a petition for relief under title 11 of the United States Code (the “Bankruptcy Code”), a bankruptcy estate is created by operation of law that consists of the debtor’s assets from which the creditors will be repaid. The Bankruptcy Code states that the estate includes “all legal or equitable interests of the debtor in property as of the commencement of the case.” This broad language reflects Congress’s intent that there be sufficient assets in the estate to protect the interests of creditors.

Despite this broad legislative language, there are certain categories of property that the debtor …

Private Student Loans May Be Dischargeable In Bankruptcy Without Meeting The Undue Hardship Requirement And If Not, There Are Two Ways To Prove Undue Hardship, Kimberly Lee

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

Section 523 of title 11 of the United States Code (the “Bankruptcy Code”) prevents former students from discharging certain educational debts in bankruptcy, unless the failure to discharge “would impose an undue hardship on the debtor and the debtor’s dependents.” Typically, it is a debtor’s burden to show that their loans may be discharged on the grounds of “undue hardship.” However, Congress has not defined “undue hardship” leaving jurisdictions divided regarding the appropriate test. Most courts have followed the Brunner three-prong test, while only the First and Eighth Circuits use the totality of the circumstances test.

Additionally, section 523(a)(8) …

A Foreign Debtor Who Lacks Permanent Residence In The U.S. May Qualify For Florida’S Homestead Exemption, Jenna Kirkland

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

The home has special significance under Florida law, as public policy favors property ownership, citizen independence, and preserving a home where a family can be sheltered and “live beyond the reach of economic misfortune.” Generally, once an individual files for bankruptcy, all property of the debtor becomes property of the estate. However, Section 522 of title 11 of the United States Code (“Bankruptcy Code”) allows a debtor to exempt certain property from the estate. The Bankruptcy Code permits states to opt out of the federal exemption scheme provided. Florida is one of the states that has opted out, therefore …

Age As A Factor In Determining Discharge Of A Debtor’S Student Loan Debt, Julia Merani

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

Title 11 of the United States Code (the “Bankruptcy Code”) provides for debtors a “fresh start” by allowing the discharge of most debt. To obtain a discharge of student loan debt, a debtor must demonstrate “undue hardship.” If the debt is not discharged, it must still be paid. The phrase “undue hardship” is not defined in the “Bankruptcy Code and congressional record provides little guidance as to what constitutes undue hardship . . . .” Even though Congress created a single standard for discharging student loan debt; the circuit courts have adopted different tests to determine if the undue …

The Split In The Application Of Section 109(A) Requirements To Chapter 15 Cases, Kate Long

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

Chapter 15 of title 11 of the United States Code (the “Bankruptcy Code”) governs recognition of foreign bankruptcy, insolvency, and debt-restructuring proceedings. Section 1517 of the Bankruptcy Code generally sets forth the requirements for recognition. In addition to those requirements, some courts have held that a foreign debtor must satisfy traditional debtor eligibility requirements for a debtor’s foreign proceeding to be recognized under Chapter 15. Other courts disagree and hold that a foreign debtor does not need to meet the traditional requirements for its foreign proceeding to be recognized under Chapter 15.

This memorandum explores the applicability of the …

Granting Derivative Standing To A Creditors’ Committee, Jordan Milite

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

A party has “standing” (the right to challenge the conduct of another in court) when that person or entity has suffered an “injury in fact.” “Derivative standing” is when a person or entity other than the harmed party steps in to assert the claim in place of the harmed party. In a case under Chapter 11 of Title 11 of the United States Code (the “Bankruptcy Code”), a bankruptcy court may grant derivative standing to a creditors’ committee or similar body, rather than the bankruptcy estate itself, to bring a claim on behalf of a debtor’s estate. This often …

True Sales Or Secured Transactions? The Contract Is Not Dispositive, Daniel Mosayov

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

Receivables are debts owed to a company for goods or services. A company seeking liquidity may sell the future interest in receivables generated through operations or use the future interest in receivables as collateral to secure a loan. The parties’ rights will vary depending on whether the receivables are sold or used as collateral. If sold, the buyer holds absolute ownership of the acquired receivables protected from other interests. If the transaction is a loan, the lender holds a security interest in the receivables, which may be junior to other interests.

A bankruptcy court can recharacterize a transaction as …

Are Nonconsensual Third-Party Releases Acceptable In United States Courts, Megan O’Connor

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

Under Title 11 of the United States Code (the “Bankruptcy Code”), a debtor will generally be released or discharged from certain liabilities. In addition, a plan confirmed under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code may provide for a “third-party release,” pursuant to which a non-debtor, like a senior officer or shareholder, may be released from certain liabilities by creditors. There is currently a split between United States Courts of Appeals regarding the scope of who can be bound by a release by creditors: some courts permit such a release in the plan where each creditor has affirmatively consented to …

The Ability To Set And Enforce Bar Dates And Determine Untimely Administrative Expense Claims In A Chapter 11 Case, Kayla Nieves

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

Title 11 of the United States Code (the “Bankruptcy Code”) does not expressly provide that bankruptcy courts may set and enforce deadlines, i.e., “bar dates,” for administrative expense claims. The Bankruptcy Code also does not expressly define “timely” or “tardy” administrative expense claims. Courts, however, have interpreted sections 105 and 503 of the Bankruptcy Code as sufficiently broad to provide bankruptcy courts with discretion to establish bar dates and allow untimely filed administrative expense claims “for cause.”

This memorandum explores the decisions that have addressed a bankruptcy court’s ability to set and enforce bar dates and to determine what …

Availability Of Setoff To Foreign Debtors And Representatives In U.S. Courts, Joseph Muschitiello

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

Setoff is the principle of allowing a party to reduce the debt it owes to an entity by applying a credit for any claim it has against the same entity. The purpose of setoff rights is rooted in “avoiding the absurdity of making A pay B when B owes A.” It is meant to be used by debtors as affirmative defenses or counterclaims. Section 553 of title 11 of the United States Code (the “Bankruptcy Code”) generally preserves the right of setoff in bankruptcy cases.

This memorandum explores how and when foreign debtors and representatives may exercise setoff rights …

Quitclaim Deeds, Divorce Decrees: Homestead Exemptions For Transferred Marital Property Across “Tenancy By The Entirety” And “Community Property” Jurisdictions, Elijah Newcomb

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

The quit claim deed is an instrument that transfers a property interest from a grantor to a grantee, without making any other representations. Quit claim deeds are common among spouses and divorcing couples as concerns regarding title defects are mitigated. These transfers have resulted in bankruptcy cases where a recipient-spouse receives a property interest encumbered by a lien, and tries to evade liability. A debtor can attempt to avoid a lien through an exemption. Exemptions are statutory provisions which can protect qualified property in a bankruptcy action. Section 522 of Title 11 of the United States Code (the “Bankruptcy …

The Prospect Of A Debtor’S Future Employment Is A Factor Courts Consider When Discharging Student Loan Debt, Joe Pizzingrillo

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

Under title 11 of the United States Code (the “Bankruptcy Code”), a debtor’s student loan debt is not dischargeable unless “excepting such debt from discharge . . . would impose an undue hardship on the debtor.” A majority of courts apply a three-prong test, known as the Brunner test, to determine if student loan debt may be discharged. Under this analysis, courts will generally consider a debtor’s prospects for future employment in deciding whether a student loan debt should be discharged. In connection therewith, courts will often take into account a debtor’s educational background and possession of a professional …

The Features And Limitations Of Asbestos Settlement Trusts: A Primer, Michael Quintman

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

Section 524 of title 11 of the United States Code (“Bankruptcy Code”) prevents creditors from recovering pre-bankruptcy debts after plan approval if their recovery was not already provided for in the approved bankruptcy plan. Subsection (g) of section 524 provides a special procedure for debtors previously engaged in the sale or production of asbestos-containing products to restructure while ensuring those injured through exposure to those products are compensated. In particular, section 524(g) provides for the formation of a trust that can settle asbestos related tort claims after the plan has been confirmed by a bankruptcy court. These trusts are …

Subsequent Transferee’S Good Faith For Value Defense: The Second And Ninth Circuit’S Perspective, Alexa Schimp

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

Under section 548(a)(1) of title 11 of the United States Code (the “Bankruptcy Code”), a trustee may “avoid any transfer . . . incurred by the debtor, that was made or incurred on or within 2 years before the date of the filing of the petition” if there is either an “actual intent” fraudulent transfer or a “constructive” fraudulent transfer. The trustee, however, may not recover if a subsequent transferee can satisfy the good faith for value defense and demonstrate that it “t[ook] for value . . . in good faith, and without knowledge of the voidability of the …

Equitable Subordination Of A Claim Depends On Insider Status, Conduct Of The Claimant, And If There Was Harm, Nicholas Smargiassi

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

Equitable subordination is a remedial doctrine pursuant to which a creditor’s claim may be subordinated to other claims. The doctrine is designed to “undo or to offset any inequality in the claim position of a creditor that will produce injustice or unfairness to other creditors in terms of the bankruptcy results.” Equitable subordination is codified in section 510(c) of Title 11 of the United States Code (the “Bankruptcy Code”). Section 510(c) of the Bankruptcy Code “authorizes a bankruptcy court to ‘subordinate for purposes of distribution all or part of an allowed claim to all or part of another allowed …

A Non-Party’S Ability To Assert A Cure Claim Under 365(B)(1)(A) In New York, Brendan Shaw

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

Under section 365 of title 11 of the United States Code (the “Bankruptcy Code”), “[a] trustee [or debtor], subject to the court's approval, may assume or reject any executory contract or unexpired lease of the debtor.” Before assumption, a debtor must promptly cure or provide adequate assurance that it will promptly cure any defaults that existed at the time of assumption. Under New York law, an intended third-party beneficiary of a contract can enforce the terms of that contract.

This Article discusses how the Southern District of New York dealt with the issue of whether an intended third-party beneficiary …

The Role A Debtor’S Age Plays When Determining Whether To Discharge Student Loan Debt, Joseph Wales

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

Title 11 of the United States Code (the “Bankruptcy Code”) generally provides for a broad discharge of pre-petition debts, resulting in a “fresh start” for debtors post-bankruptcy. However, section 523 of the Bankruptcy Code provides that a debtor may not be discharged from student loans unless there is a showing of “undue hardship.”

“Undue hardship” is a term of art largely dependent on the circumstances of the debtor. One common circumstance is the age of the debtor. The effect of a debtor’s age on their ability to pay can vary, so the role age plays in undue hardship analyses …

When A Critical Vendor May Be Insulated From Preference Liability, Michael A. Solimani

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

Under Title 11 of the United States Code (the “Bankruptcy Code”) a trustee or debtor in possession (“DIP”) may avoid certain payments made by the debtor to a creditor within ninety days prior to filing for bankruptcy, or one year if the creditor is an insider. The Bankruptcy Code contains certain defenses to preference claims. A court may also release a creditor from such claims. Such a release may be found in orders approving payment of pre-petition claims to a “critical vendor.” Absent such an express release, it is unclear whether a trustee or DIP is precluded from pursuing …

Circumstances Under Which A Court Will Dismiss A Chapter 11 Filing Made In Bad Faith, Nicholas Wogan

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

Under section 1112(b) of title 11 of the United States Code (the “Bankruptcy Code”), a bankruptcy court may dismiss a Chapter 11 filing “for cause.” It is a generally accepted principle that “for cause” dismissal includes dismissal of filings made in bad faith, and this concept originates in a need for bankruptcy courts to uphold the jurisdictional integrity of the Chapter 11 process from those who would seek to abuse it. Courts deciding whether dismissal for bad faith is warranted typically employ a two-step analysis: first to determine whether a bad faith filing is “cause” for dismissal under section …